Skip to main content

The Aadhaar confusion Voluntary yet mandatory

The Aadhaar confusion Voluntary yet mandatory
With the Supreme Court’s next hearing expected in November, one can wait for some more time before linking it to bank accounts and mobile numbers, say expertsIf you download the Aadhaar enrolment form from the Unique Identification Authority of India’s (UIDAI’s) website (https://goo.gl/zYVW76), at the top it states that “Aadhaar Enrolment is free and voluntary”.
But, the government is going all out to ensure this 12-digit unique identity number becomes a necessity. Everyone, including banks, mobile operators, and even jewellers, want it. In the latter case, the government was quick to step in and clarify that there was no need to provide the Aadhaar or PAN card for transactions above Rs 50,000. Finance Minister Arun Jaitley recently hinted that Aadhaar might be needed for travelling abroad and buying a car as well.
Meanwhile, banks and mobile operators are sending messages, which ‘request’ that you link it immediately, in rather intimidating language. Going by the government’s diktat, an individual cannot operate his mobile phone or do banking transactions from 2018, if he does not have Aadhaar.In June, the Supreme Court had said those who have Aadhaar need to furnish it for filing income-tax returns. It also said if one didn’t have an Aadhaar card, their PAN would not be cancelled for failure to comply.
It’s not that Aadhaar hasn’t done any good. Nandan Nilekani, former UIDAI chief and current non-executive chairman of technology major Infosys, recently said the Centre had managed to save Rs 9 billion (over Rs 58,000 crore) by eliminating fake and duplicate beneficiaries of government schemes through the Aadhaar programme. Legal question: On August 24, the Supreme Court had ruled the right to privacy was a fundamental one protected under Article 21 of the Constitution, which upholds the right to life. However, fundamental rights guaranteed by the Indian Constitution are subject to reasonable restrictions. And, the imposition of Aadhaar still needs to pass the right to privacy test.
However, many believe the government making Aadhaar mandatory doesn’t have legal backing. “According to the Supreme Court’s order, Aadhaar cannot be made mandatory for anything. Every agency making it compulsory is violating the apex court’s order, as well as the Aadhaar Act, 2016. The SC had in fact asked the Centre to advertise across print, radio and electronic media that Aadhaar is voluntary,” says Gopal Krishna, convener of Citizens Forum for Civil Liberties, which campaigns against surveillance technologies.

If you don’t have an Aadhaar number or are uncomfortable linking all accounts to one identity, it’s best to FINANCIAL SECTOR HIGH VALUE PURCHASE IDENTITY wait for some time. The Supreme Court is hearing a slew of petitions challenging the legal validity of Aadhaar, which are clubbed into one. The next date for the hearing of the case is in the first week of November. So far, Aadhaar is voluntary: “The only reason the government is going against the Act and SC is to boost the numbers of enrolments.
When the case comes for the next hearing, the government can show that a high percentage Leakages, a worry: In August, the Bengaluru police caught a 31-yearold software developer who allegedly hacked and illegally accessed the UIDAI server and is suspected to have stolen data. If scammers get hold of such data, they can devise tricks to access your bank and other accounts.
There are already cases where criminals changed the mobile number linked to an Aadhaar and stole money from the linked bank accounts. It is done by tricking the person into revealing the one-time password he receives on mobile to change the mobile number linked to Aadhaar. Recently, a Right to Information (RTI) application filed by Bengaluru-based Matthew Thomas revealed that contracts signed with foreign firms by the UIDAI give foreign firms ‘full access’ to classified data, including fingerprints, iris scan info, and personal information like date of birth, address, and mobile number of applicants. They were also allowed to store the data for seven years.
In such circumstances, a person has limited options. “Ask the institution to show you the notification or communication that states Aadhaar is mandatory,” says Wilfred D’Costa, Convenor at Indian Social Action Forum. New customers need to cite the SC’s orders in the letter. They also need to tell the organisations that their request is in violation of the court’s order and therefore not legal. They cannot mandate Aadhaar until the SC passes the final order. Also point out that according to the Aadhaar Act, it’s voluntary to enrol for it.
The Business Standard, New Delhi, 16th October 2017

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

New money laundering norms stump jewellery sector

New money laundering norms stump jewellery sector Dealers with turnover of Rs 2 crore and above covered; industry says threshold too low The central government has notified the money laundering rules for the gems and jewellery sector with immediate effect. Now, any entity deals in precious metals, precious stones, or other high-value goods and has a turnover of Rs 2 crore or more in a financial year will be covered under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA, 2002). The limit of Rs 2 crore would be calculated on the basis of the previous year’s turnover, said the notification. The directorate general of goods and service tax intelligence has been appointed under the Act. Sources said the government’s move to apply the PMLA to the jewellery sector was a fallout of income-tax raids on jewellers soon after demonetisation last November, when it was found that they sold gold and jewellery at a huge premium and accepted old currency notes as payment. The notification, issued on Augus…

Confusion over branded food GST

Confusion over branded food GST The GST Council's statement over the weekend on applying tax on branded food items has left most of the trade confused.

Even though the Council has not changed the rates on food -0 per cent on unbranded stuff and 5 per cent on brands -many small traders who didn't levy GST earlier said they could come under the 5 per cent slab after the clarification.

While they predicted some increase in consumer prices, large players said they can absorb GST in many ways and keep prices steady.

"Trade is confused and hence on behalf of our chamber, we have asked our members to go ahead and charge 5 per cent GST," said Sushil Sureka, general secretary of the Ahilya Chamber of Commerce and Industry in Indore.

The statement clarifying the application of GST came after some businesses were found deregistering their brands and selling under corporate brand name without paying tax, after the Council exempted unbranded food from the new all-encompassing indirec…