Skip to main content

The Aadhaar confusion Voluntary yet mandatory

The Aadhaar confusion Voluntary yet mandatory
With the Supreme Court’s next hearing expected in November, one can wait for some more time before linking it to bank accounts and mobile numbers, say expertsIf you download the Aadhaar enrolment form from the Unique Identification Authority of India’s (UIDAI’s) website (https://goo.gl/zYVW76), at the top it states that “Aadhaar Enrolment is free and voluntary”.
But, the government is going all out to ensure this 12-digit unique identity number becomes a necessity. Everyone, including banks, mobile operators, and even jewellers, want it. In the latter case, the government was quick to step in and clarify that there was no need to provide the Aadhaar or PAN card for transactions above Rs 50,000. Finance Minister Arun Jaitley recently hinted that Aadhaar might be needed for travelling abroad and buying a car as well.
Meanwhile, banks and mobile operators are sending messages, which ‘request’ that you link it immediately, in rather intimidating language. Going by the government’s diktat, an individual cannot operate his mobile phone or do banking transactions from 2018, if he does not have Aadhaar.In June, the Supreme Court had said those who have Aadhaar need to furnish it for filing income-tax returns. It also said if one didn’t have an Aadhaar card, their PAN would not be cancelled for failure to comply.
It’s not that Aadhaar hasn’t done any good. Nandan Nilekani, former UIDAI chief and current non-executive chairman of technology major Infosys, recently said the Centre had managed to save Rs 9 billion (over Rs 58,000 crore) by eliminating fake and duplicate beneficiaries of government schemes through the Aadhaar programme. Legal question: On August 24, the Supreme Court had ruled the right to privacy was a fundamental one protected under Article 21 of the Constitution, which upholds the right to life. However, fundamental rights guaranteed by the Indian Constitution are subject to reasonable restrictions. And, the imposition of Aadhaar still needs to pass the right to privacy test.
However, many believe the government making Aadhaar mandatory doesn’t have legal backing. “According to the Supreme Court’s order, Aadhaar cannot be made mandatory for anything. Every agency making it compulsory is violating the apex court’s order, as well as the Aadhaar Act, 2016. The SC had in fact asked the Centre to advertise across print, radio and electronic media that Aadhaar is voluntary,” says Gopal Krishna, convener of Citizens Forum for Civil Liberties, which campaigns against surveillance technologies.

If you don’t have an Aadhaar number or are uncomfortable linking all accounts to one identity, it’s best to FINANCIAL SECTOR HIGH VALUE PURCHASE IDENTITY wait for some time. The Supreme Court is hearing a slew of petitions challenging the legal validity of Aadhaar, which are clubbed into one. The next date for the hearing of the case is in the first week of November. So far, Aadhaar is voluntary: “The only reason the government is going against the Act and SC is to boost the numbers of enrolments.
When the case comes for the next hearing, the government can show that a high percentage Leakages, a worry: In August, the Bengaluru police caught a 31-yearold software developer who allegedly hacked and illegally accessed the UIDAI server and is suspected to have stolen data. If scammers get hold of such data, they can devise tricks to access your bank and other accounts.
There are already cases where criminals changed the mobile number linked to an Aadhaar and stole money from the linked bank accounts. It is done by tricking the person into revealing the one-time password he receives on mobile to change the mobile number linked to Aadhaar. Recently, a Right to Information (RTI) application filed by Bengaluru-based Matthew Thomas revealed that contracts signed with foreign firms by the UIDAI give foreign firms ‘full access’ to classified data, including fingerprints, iris scan info, and personal information like date of birth, address, and mobile number of applicants. They were also allowed to store the data for seven years.
In such circumstances, a person has limited options. “Ask the institution to show you the notification or communication that states Aadhaar is mandatory,” says Wilfred D’Costa, Convenor at Indian Social Action Forum. New customers need to cite the SC’s orders in the letter. They also need to tell the organisations that their request is in violation of the court’s order and therefore not legal. They cannot mandate Aadhaar until the SC passes the final order. Also point out that according to the Aadhaar Act, it’s voluntary to enrol for it.
The Business Standard, New Delhi, 16th October 2017

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

At 18%, GST Rate to be Less Taxing for Most Goods

About 70% of all goods and some consumer durables likely to cost less

A number of goods such as cosmetics, shaving creams, shampoo, toothpaste, soap, plastics, paints and some consumer durables could become cheaper under the proposed goods and services tax (GST) regime as most items are likely to be subject to the rate of 18% rather than the higher one of 28%.

India is likely to rely on the effective tax rate currently applicable on a commodity to get a fix on the GST slab, said a government official, allowing most goods to make it to the lower bracket.

For instance, if an item comes within the 12% excise slab but the effective tax is 8% due to abatement, then the latter will be considered for GST fitment.

Going by this formulation, about 70% of all goods could fall in the 18% bracket.

The GST Council has finalised a four-tier tax structure of 5%, 12%, 18% and 28% but has left room for the highest slab to be pegged at 40%. A committee of officials will work out the fitment and the council…

Coffee-Toffee, the GST Debate Continues

Hundreds of crores of rupees in the form of taxes ride on the exact categorisation of products Is Parachute hair oil or edible oil? Is KitKat a chocolate or a biscuit? Is a Vicks tablet medicament or confectionery? For the taxpayer and the tax collector, this is much more than an exercise in semantics -hundreds of crores of rupees ride on the exact categorisation.
As the government moves closer to rolling out the goods and services tax (GST) on July 1, many such distinctions are being debated so that no ambiguity remains. Not just that, the government is revisiting old tax cases that were lost over product categorisation, according to people with knowledge of the matter, presumably with a view to making sure that revenue collections can be maximised. “In the past, several tax officers had challenged some of the product categorisations, including those in the retail segment, but lost out in court or at appellate level,“ said one of the persons. “Now we have a chance to go ahead with speci…

Deposit gush:-CA Institute Bats for Special Audit