Skip to main content

Sebi panel for more curbs on royalty, info sharing

Sebi panel for more curbs on royalty, info sharing
The corporate governance panel of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has recommended more checks and balances on royalty and brand payments, related party transactions and sharing of information between the management and entities not part of the board.Among the key recommendations by the committee is one on the aspect of exchange of price sensitive information between companies and a  promoter no longer a part of the board or management
The committee said a company could exchange unpublished price sensitive information (UPSI) with its promoters or persons only after the entity enters in an agreement of information sharing with the designated person.These agreements would last at least one year and the company would reserve the right to terminate them.
According to current norms, such information can be shared only between the board members.The information can be shared with any other person only ona “need to know” basis.But, several promoters are often not a part of the company´s boards but their opinion could be valuable for the company.
The move comes after the corporate battle between Ratan Tata and Cyrus Mistry, where the latter had alleged the boards of Tata companies were sharing UPSI with Ratan Tata, who was no longer a part of the board of these companies.
“While it is recognised that the status of a promoter is a kin to a perpetual insider requiring access to information on a  regular basis and the role of the nominee director is to protect the interests of the nominating shareholder (subject to the former´s fiduciary duty), the information flow to such promoters and significant shareholders occurs in the ´shadows´ in the absence ofagreen channel legitimising such information flow,” the panel said.
“The committee members proposed that the regulatory framework should be amended to provide an enabling transparent framework regulating the information rights of certain promoters and significant shareholders to reduce subjectivity and provide clarity for ease of business,” the 25 member panel, headed by Kotak Mahindra Bank ViceChairman and Managing Director Uday Kotak, said in its report.
The panel also recommended that if a company wants to pay any promoter director a remuneration of more than Rs 5 crore, or more than 2.5 per cent of the net profit, the move will need approval from shareholders throug ha special resolution.Although there is a ceiling on the remuneration payable to directors under the Companies Act, there are no provisions for executive promoter directors.
Among other prominent changes suggested by the committee are relaxed norms for promoter reclassification.Although Sebi brought in a framework for reclassification of promoters a few years ago, there are hardly any takers, given the stringent rules.Until now,a promoter who is not involved in the day today activities of the company, could reclassify himself as shareholder if he doesn´t own more than one percent stake in the company.
The committee has recommended increasing the threshold to 10 per cent.Such a move will now require a nod from the company´s board as well as shareholders.The committee also recommended that payments made by listed entities with respect to brand usage/royalty amounting to more than five percent of the consolidated turnover of the listed entity may require prior approval from public shareholders.
The Business Standard, New Delhi, 06th October 20


Popular posts from this blog

At 18%, GST Rate to be Less Taxing for Most Goods

About 70% of all goods and some consumer durables likely to cost less

A number of goods such as cosmetics, shaving creams, shampoo, toothpaste, soap, plastics, paints and some consumer durables could become cheaper under the proposed goods and services tax (GST) regime as most items are likely to be subject to the rate of 18% rather than the higher one of 28%.

India is likely to rely on the effective tax rate currently applicable on a commodity to get a fix on the GST slab, said a government official, allowing most goods to make it to the lower bracket.

For instance, if an item comes within the 12% excise slab but the effective tax is 8% due to abatement, then the latter will be considered for GST fitment.

Going by this formulation, about 70% of all goods could fall in the 18% bracket.

The GST Council has finalised a four-tier tax structure of 5%, 12%, 18% and 28% but has left room for the highest slab to be pegged at 40%. A committee of officials will work out the fitment and the council…

Coffee-Toffee, the GST Debate Continues

Hundreds of crores of rupees in the form of taxes ride on the exact categorisation of products Is Parachute hair oil or edible oil? Is KitKat a chocolate or a biscuit? Is a Vicks tablet medicament or confectionery? For the taxpayer and the tax collector, this is much more than an exercise in semantics -hundreds of crores of rupees ride on the exact categorisation.
As the government moves closer to rolling out the goods and services tax (GST) on July 1, many such distinctions are being debated so that no ambiguity remains. Not just that, the government is revisiting old tax cases that were lost over product categorisation, according to people with knowledge of the matter, presumably with a view to making sure that revenue collections can be maximised. “In the past, several tax officers had challenged some of the product categorisations, including those in the retail segment, but lost out in court or at appellate level,“ said one of the persons. “Now we have a chance to go ahead with speci…

Deposit gush:-CA Institute Bats for Special Audit