Skip to main content

Sebi panel for more curbs on royalty, info sharing

Sebi panel for more curbs on royalty, info sharing
The corporate governance panel of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has recommended more checks and balances on royalty and brand payments, related party transactions and sharing of information between the management and entities not part of the board.Among the key recommendations by the committee is one on the aspect of exchange of price sensitive information between companies and a  promoter no longer a part of the board or management
The committee said a company could exchange unpublished price sensitive information (UPSI) with its promoters or persons only after the entity enters in an agreement of information sharing with the designated person.These agreements would last at least one year and the company would reserve the right to terminate them.
According to current norms, such information can be shared only between the board members.The information can be shared with any other person only ona “need to know” basis.But, several promoters are often not a part of the company´s boards but their opinion could be valuable for the company.
The move comes after the corporate battle between Ratan Tata and Cyrus Mistry, where the latter had alleged the boards of Tata companies were sharing UPSI with Ratan Tata, who was no longer a part of the board of these companies.
“While it is recognised that the status of a promoter is a kin to a perpetual insider requiring access to information on a  regular basis and the role of the nominee director is to protect the interests of the nominating shareholder (subject to the former´s fiduciary duty), the information flow to such promoters and significant shareholders occurs in the ´shadows´ in the absence ofagreen channel legitimising such information flow,” the panel said.
“The committee members proposed that the regulatory framework should be amended to provide an enabling transparent framework regulating the information rights of certain promoters and significant shareholders to reduce subjectivity and provide clarity for ease of business,” the 25 member panel, headed by Kotak Mahindra Bank ViceChairman and Managing Director Uday Kotak, said in its report.
The panel also recommended that if a company wants to pay any promoter director a remuneration of more than Rs 5 crore, or more than 2.5 per cent of the net profit, the move will need approval from shareholders throug ha special resolution.Although there is a ceiling on the remuneration payable to directors under the Companies Act, there are no provisions for executive promoter directors.
Among other prominent changes suggested by the committee are relaxed norms for promoter reclassification.Although Sebi brought in a framework for reclassification of promoters a few years ago, there are hardly any takers, given the stringent rules.Until now,a promoter who is not involved in the day today activities of the company, could reclassify himself as shareholder if he doesn´t own more than one percent stake in the company.
The committee has recommended increasing the threshold to 10 per cent.Such a move will now require a nod from the company´s board as well as shareholders.The committee also recommended that payments made by listed entities with respect to brand usage/royalty amounting to more than five percent of the consolidated turnover of the listed entity may require prior approval from public shareholders.
The Business Standard, New Delhi, 06th October 20

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

New money laundering norms stump jewellery sector

New money laundering norms stump jewellery sector Dealers with turnover of Rs 2 crore and above covered; industry says threshold too low The central government has notified the money laundering rules for the gems and jewellery sector with immediate effect. Now, any entity deals in precious metals, precious stones, or other high-value goods and has a turnover of Rs 2 crore or more in a financial year will be covered under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA, 2002). The limit of Rs 2 crore would be calculated on the basis of the previous year’s turnover, said the notification. The directorate general of goods and service tax intelligence has been appointed under the Act. Sources said the government’s move to apply the PMLA to the jewellery sector was a fallout of income-tax raids on jewellers soon after demonetisation last November, when it was found that they sold gold and jewellery at a huge premium and accepted old currency notes as payment. The notification, issued on Augus…

Confusion over branded food GST

Confusion over branded food GST The GST Council's statement over the weekend on applying tax on branded food items has left most of the trade confused.

Even though the Council has not changed the rates on food -0 per cent on unbranded stuff and 5 per cent on brands -many small traders who didn't levy GST earlier said they could come under the 5 per cent slab after the clarification.

While they predicted some increase in consumer prices, large players said they can absorb GST in many ways and keep prices steady.

"Trade is confused and hence on behalf of our chamber, we have asked our members to go ahead and charge 5 per cent GST," said Sushil Sureka, general secretary of the Ahilya Chamber of Commerce and Industry in Indore.

The statement clarifying the application of GST came after some businesses were found deregistering their brands and selling under corporate brand name without paying tax, after the Council exempted unbranded food from the new all-encompassing indirec…