Skip to main content

Sebi panel for more curbs on royalty, info sharing

Sebi panel for more curbs on royalty, info sharing
The corporate governance panel of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has recommended more checks and balances on royalty and brand payments, related party transactions and sharing of information between the management and entities not part of the board.Among the key recommendations by the committee is one on the aspect of exchange of price sensitive information between companies and a  promoter no longer a part of the board or management
The committee said a company could exchange unpublished price sensitive information (UPSI) with its promoters or persons only after the entity enters in an agreement of information sharing with the designated person.These agreements would last at least one year and the company would reserve the right to terminate them.
According to current norms, such information can be shared only between the board members.The information can be shared with any other person only ona “need to know” basis.But, several promoters are often not a part of the company´s boards but their opinion could be valuable for the company.
The move comes after the corporate battle between Ratan Tata and Cyrus Mistry, where the latter had alleged the boards of Tata companies were sharing UPSI with Ratan Tata, who was no longer a part of the board of these companies.
“While it is recognised that the status of a promoter is a kin to a perpetual insider requiring access to information on a  regular basis and the role of the nominee director is to protect the interests of the nominating shareholder (subject to the former´s fiduciary duty), the information flow to such promoters and significant shareholders occurs in the ´shadows´ in the absence ofagreen channel legitimising such information flow,” the panel said.
“The committee members proposed that the regulatory framework should be amended to provide an enabling transparent framework regulating the information rights of certain promoters and significant shareholders to reduce subjectivity and provide clarity for ease of business,” the 25 member panel, headed by Kotak Mahindra Bank ViceChairman and Managing Director Uday Kotak, said in its report.
The panel also recommended that if a company wants to pay any promoter director a remuneration of more than Rs 5 crore, or more than 2.5 per cent of the net profit, the move will need approval from shareholders throug ha special resolution.Although there is a ceiling on the remuneration payable to directors under the Companies Act, there are no provisions for executive promoter directors.
Among other prominent changes suggested by the committee are relaxed norms for promoter reclassification.Although Sebi brought in a framework for reclassification of promoters a few years ago, there are hardly any takers, given the stringent rules.Until now,a promoter who is not involved in the day today activities of the company, could reclassify himself as shareholder if he doesn´t own more than one percent stake in the company.
The committee has recommended increasing the threshold to 10 per cent.Such a move will now require a nod from the company´s board as well as shareholders.The committee also recommended that payments made by listed entities with respect to brand usage/royalty amounting to more than five percent of the consolidated turnover of the listed entity may require prior approval from public shareholders.
The Business Standard, New Delhi, 06th October 20

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation Concerns about economic growth and easing inflation prompted five of the six monetary policy committee (MPC) members to call for a cut in the repo rate, but most warned that prices could start accelerating, show the minutes of the panel’s last meeting, released on Wednesday. The comments reflected a tone of caution and flagged upside risks to inflation from farm loan waivers, rise in food prices, especially vegetables, price revisions withheld ahead of the goods and services tax, implementation of house rent allowance under the 7th pay commission and fading of favourable base effect, among others. On 2 August, the panel chose to cut the repurchase rate—the rate at which the central bank infuses liquidity in the banking system—by 25 basis points to 6%. One basis point is one-hundredth of a percentage point. Pami Dua, professor at the Delhi School of Economics, wrote that her analysis showed “a fading economic growth outlook, as …

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

Differential Tax Levy under GST: Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks

Differential Tax Levy under GST:Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks The government’s decision to charge an enhanced tax rate on trademark food brands is leading several rice, wheat and cereal manufacturers to consider de-registering their product trademarks. Irked by the June 28 central government notification fixing a 5 per cent goods and services tax (GST) rate on food items packaged in unit containers and bearing registered brand names, the industry has made several representations to the government to reconsider the differential tax levy, which these players say is creating an unlevel playing field within these highly-competitive and low-margin industries. Sources say that the move has affected the packaged rice industry the hardest and allowed the un-registered market leaders, India Gate and Daawat, to gain advantage as compared to other registered brands such as Kohinoor and Lal Qilla. Smaller players are even more worried with this enhanced rate of tax (against the otherwise …