Skip to main content

Sebi breather on loan default disclosure

Sebi breather on loan default disclosure
Regulator is considering increasing the timeline for disclosing defaults to 30 days
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) is looking to issue a more relaxed loan default disclosure framework.

According to sources, the market regulator now plans to give up to a month’s time to companies for disclosing loan defaults and also make provision to explain the nature of the default. Under the previous proposal (according to a circular dated August 4) — the implementation of which has been deferred — Sebi had mandated companies to make public any loan default within 24 hours of missing the repayment obligation.

Sources said Sebi is re-looking at some of the contentious issues in the proposed circular, which have been brought to its notice by market players, including industry bodies, banks and rating agencies.

Under the revised directives, Sebi may increase the “delta D” or date of default to 30 days and may give some additional time to companies to make disclosures. Besides, it could also make some provisions to state if the default was technical in nature and provide some exemptions on that part.

Sebi and the finance ministry are said to have received a slew of representations in the past one month which say Sebi’s directives were not practical in nature and need detailed analysis.

“There are two major issues with Sebi’s earlier circular. One, it was not practically possible for companies to make disclosure of default in one working day. Second, there was no consideration on the nature of loan default,” said a person with knowledge of the development. “Threshold cannot be absolute and has to be relative to the total liability of the company. Besides there should be proper demarcation on the nature of default,” said a senior official of an industry body.

Also, the circular was issued without floating a discussion paper inviting public feedback. Typically, Sebi issues a discussion paper before announcing any such policy changes. Banks, too, have expressed concerns over the impact of the circular on their core capital in case rating agencies decide to downgrade corporates making default disclosures.

“Disclosure of default on loans within 24 hours could put banks in a Catch 22 situation. Once a company makes such disclosure, credit rating agencies would have to step in and downgrade the company’s rating to default. Once credit rating agencies attribute the default rating, the risk attached to the loan goes up and it impacts the capital adequacy ratio of the bank. In other words, banks will be forced to arrange more capital for day-to-day business,” said a bank expert on the condition of anonymity.

Ashvin Parekh, managing partner, Ashvin Parekh Advisory Services, said the purpose of the circular was to benefit banks, but it could have ended up increasing their burden as they would have been required to make provisions in case of downgrades by rating agencies.

According to the Reserve Bank of India norms, even though non-payment on the due date is deemed a default, banks classify the loan as a non-performing asset only after 90 days.

The default disclosure norm was hailed by many as a game- changing move that would have helped banks, which are saddled with bad loans of more than Rs 10 lakh crore.

S Raman, former Sebi whole-time member, in an interview to Business Standard last month before retiring from his post, had said the rule would “infuse discipline” and if introduced earlier would have helped prevent bad loans piling up.

“It is a game changer and the most effective measure taken by the regulator ever. So far it was 90 days and within the timeline. During this period, investors did not know what was happening in the company,” he had said.

“This could impact investment decisions. We have also provided several exemptions to banks while acquiring stressed assets, including exemption from takeover rules... the accumulation of NPAs is due to asymmetry in information. The investor should have real-time information,” he had said.

The purpose of the circularwas to benefit banks, but it could have ended up increasing their burden as they would have been required to make provisions in case of downgrades by rating agencies, experts say
The Business Standard, New Delhi, 04th October 2017


Popular posts from this blog

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation Concerns about economic growth and easing inflation prompted five of the six monetary policy committee (MPC) members to call for a cut in the repo rate, but most warned that prices could start accelerating, show the minutes of the panel’s last meeting, released on Wednesday. The comments reflected a tone of caution and flagged upside risks to inflation from farm loan waivers, rise in food prices, especially vegetables, price revisions withheld ahead of the goods and services tax, implementation of house rent allowance under the 7th pay commission and fading of favourable base effect, among others. On 2 August, the panel chose to cut the repurchase rate—the rate at which the central bank infuses liquidity in the banking system—by 25 basis points to 6%. One basis point is one-hundredth of a percentage point. Pami Dua, professor at the Delhi School of Economics, wrote that her analysis showed “a fading economic growth outlook, as …

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

Differential Tax Levy under GST: Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks

Differential Tax Levy under GST:Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks The government’s decision to charge an enhanced tax rate on trademark food brands is leading several rice, wheat and cereal manufacturers to consider de-registering their product trademarks. Irked by the June 28 central government notification fixing a 5 per cent goods and services tax (GST) rate on food items packaged in unit containers and bearing registered brand names, the industry has made several representations to the government to reconsider the differential tax levy, which these players say is creating an unlevel playing field within these highly-competitive and low-margin industries. Sources say that the move has affected the packaged rice industry the hardest and allowed the un-registered market leaders, India Gate and Daawat, to gain advantage as compared to other registered brands such as Kohinoor and Lal Qilla. Smaller players are even more worried with this enhanced rate of tax (against the otherwise …