Skip to main content

Only 70% file detailed return under GST in July

Only 70% file detailed return under GST in July
Deadline ends,after two exdtenions; govt assess reasons for low rate of compliance
About 70 per cent of the assessees under the goods and services tax (GST) had filed detailed sales returns for July as on Tuesday, the official deadline.Low compliance, said officials.No further extension was given; the deadline had been extended twice earlier.About 4.59 million entities of the eligible 6.5 mn filed the GSTR1 return, for the first month of GST. “We will assess why many people have not filed. We have already sent reminders to those who filed GSTR3B, the summarised return form, but not GSTR1,” saidaGST Network GSTN) official.
The deadline to file GSTR1 was extended by a month from September 10 at the GST Council meeting last month in Hyderabad.Earlier, the deadline was extended from September 5 on account of technical issues with GSTN.If a taxpayer fails to file GSTR1 by the deadline, the buyer of his products would face difficulty in availing of input tax credit.
Which is why, noted Pratik Jain, partner at consultancy PwC, the number of GSTR1 returns are much lower than what one would have expected.It is possible many dealers with GST registration have nil turnover and, hence, did not file the return.“The government will have to investigate the reasons and take corrective steps,” he added.Three million returns had been filed as of September 10, the day after announcement of the extension.
About 1.5 mn more returns were filed after that.GSTR1 has 13 sections containing details of sales transactions of a registered dealer for a month.Alittle more than 330 mn invoices were filed and processed by the GST system along with the GSTR1 of July. Of this, 73 per cent were uploaded using the Offline Tool developed by GSTN; 16 per cent of the invoices came through GST Suvidha Providers.
The inward supplies return or GSTR2 for July has to be filed by October 31. And, GSTR3 for the month by November 10. Once a taxpayer files GSTR1, the government utilises the information to verify GSTR3 for the dealer and GSTR2A for dealers to whom supplies have been made.For the transition period, the government has allowed assessees to file self summary returns for input-output, called GSTR3B.
The lower than expected GSTR3B returns filed in the first two months of GST implementation had prompted revenue secretary Hasmukh Adhia to ask central and state commissioners to urgently conduct a survey to know why. Only about 64 per cent of those eligible filed GSTR3B, for August; 84.2 per cent did so for July. Of the 7.3 mn eligible ones, 4.7 mn filed the summarised return for August.The questions suggested in the survey on why GSTR3B was not filed are: The site was not functioning, filing process was too complicated, system didn´t allow me to file nil return and ´could not´ preview return details before filing returns.
In addition, tax officers will take suggestions for improving the returns filing process.Last week the gst council,chaired by union finance minister arun jaitley,eased compliance rules for small and medium enterprises.Those with annual turnover up to Rs 1.5 crore will from october onward ned to quarterly,not monthly.it is also raised the eligibility limit  in terms of annual turnover to Rs 75 lakh for the composition scheme,which allows a flat rate and easy compliance. The window will be open till March 31 next year.Assessees are requirwed to file and pay taxes only quarterly under the composition scheme. A trader pays at 1 percent,a manufacturer at 2 percent and a restaurant owner at 5 percent but they are not allowed input tax credit.About 90 percent of tax payers under GST have annual turnover up to  Rs 1.5 crore.
The Business Standard, New Delhi, 12th October 2017

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Govt’s gamble on GST cuts: What do the bond and currency markets signal?

  It’s not just humans who suffer from cognitive biases; markets do too. Interestingly, different financial markets exhibit distinct biases, each interpreting events through its own prism of prejudice. Take the recent announcements on GST reforms: equity markets have chosen to view them through the lens of growth, while bond and currency markets are focusing on potential macroeconomic risks—fiscal pressures and current account challenges. So, which lens captures the true pulse?Equity markets may be right in expecting GST reforms to revive consumption, which has remained lacklustre for a while. But the key question remains—will this revival come at the cost of broader macro stability?It is well known that consumption stocks have rallied since the GST rationalisation announcement. But what about bond markets? What signals are they sending since this rejig was announced from the ramparts of the Red Fort?The signs aren't encouraging. Bond prices have slumped and yields have surged sinc...

Luxury carmakers urge clarity on GST rates to boost festive season sales

  A clear picture regarding new GST rates at the earliest will help the overall auto industry, including the luxury car segment, to regain momentum in the ongoing quarter, which generally sees enhanced sales on account of the festive season.The high-powered GST Council, chaired by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, will meet on September 3-4 to discuss moving to a two-slab taxation.In an interaction with PTI, BMW Group India President and CEO Hardeep Singh Brar said the recent speculation about the change in GST rates has caused uncertainty in the minds of consumers.Consumer interest and demand is strong, but they (prospective buyers) have adopted a wait-and-watch approach, and this delayed decision-making is impacting new vehicle sales at a certain level, he noted."Expediting clarity on GST rates is essential to get back to speed and ensure the auto sector's contribution to economic growth during this quarter is robust," Brar stated.He also hoped that the sustainable p...

Sebi proposes tighter norms for green bond third-party reviewers

  Sebi on Friday said it has proposed to tighten the norms to appoint independent third-party reviewers or certifiers for green debt securities to align them with requirements for other ESG-linked bonds.In a draft circular, Sebi said that the current norms for green bonds, introduced in February 2023, lack detailed requirements around reviewer independence, conflict of interest mitigation, and disclosure standards that are now in place for other ESG-linked securities under a June 2025 circular.The regulator's latest proposal seeks public comments on a revised framework that would bring parity by incorporating comprehensive criteria for third-party certifiers of green bonds on non-convertible securities.Under the proposed norms, issuers of green debt securities will need to appoint reviewers who are independent of their management, directors, and key managerial personnel. These reviewers will be remunerated in a way that prevents any conflicts of interest and possess relevant expert...