Skip to main content

IGST relief likely for foreign banks MNCs

IGST relief likely for foreign banks  MNCs 
The government may be looking to give some respite to foreign banks and multinationals which are saddled with the additional cost of paying 18% integrated goods and services tax (IGST) on the services provided to their international offices, said two people close to the development. 
An advisory to this effect may be issued by the tax department in the coming weeks, one of the persons cited earlier said, requesting not to be named. 
“The tax officials realise that this (tax on multinationals) is an unintended consequence, and this could get resolved in the coming weeks,” the other person said.
Under the GST framework, a multinational — especially a foreign bank or infrastructure company — that has a branch or operation in India, has to pay IGST. Many foreign banks have already started paying 18% IGST to avoid any litigation. This tax liability has emerged under the GST framework as it considers services provided by one branch to another as interstate supply. 
Tax experts point out that while the current law mainly impacts foreign banks and multinationals which have liaison offices in India, many Indian banks would also be impacted. 
“Impact of this provision is very wide and extends to liaison offices or any other branch which renders services to its parent outside India. Also, any head office which renders services from India to its branch located in any other country will be impacted,” said Abhishek A Rastogi, partner, Khaitan & Co. 
According to people in the know, some top public-sector banks are consulting their lawyers in this regard. “The concern is that they would also be required to pay the IGST in cases where services are provided to foreign branches,” said a person close to a PSU bank. 
“This particular issue also affects project and liaison offices of many other multinational companies, including those in the infrastructure sector. The issue has already been flagged off to the government and one would hope for a quick resolution, else it would lead to a long-drawn litigation,” said Pratik Jain, national leader, indirect tax, PwC India. 
ET had reported on September 29 that DBS Bank has filed a writ petition in the Delhi High Court challenging the IGST levy. 
Tax experts point out that it may prove to be a tiring exercise for Indian tax authorities if they demand tax on such transactions. “The question is why the recipient head office or branches that are located outside India should bear such a cost when they do not fall under Indian tax authority’s jurisdiction,” said Sachin Menon, head, indirect tax, KPMG India. “ 
“If this clause continues, India will lose business.” 
A senior tax official had earlier told ET that the government is “mindful of some situations where the GST has had an adverse impact”. In the last one week, a group of senior tax officials has met some tax experts to know industry- specific pain points in GST. 
The focus was on all the issues that were raised by companies, banks and associations by filing writ petitions in courts. According to tax experts, the absence of an advance ruling authority is leading to many companies and associations dragging the GST Council and the government to court. 
According to experts, in some cases, like in the case of IGST on supply of services to head offices outside India, there could be issues around constitutional validity. “The place of provision of these services is outside of India and, hence, it appears that unintended ambiguity has crept in, unlike in the earlier tax regime. The IGST provisions don't have the power to levy tax on such transactions and constitutional validity has to be tested in the courts,” said Rastogi. 
The Economic Times, New Delhi, 26th October 2017

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

New money laundering norms stump jewellery sector

New money laundering norms stump jewellery sector Dealers with turnover of Rs 2 crore and above covered; industry says threshold too low The central government has notified the money laundering rules for the gems and jewellery sector with immediate effect. Now, any entity deals in precious metals, precious stones, or other high-value goods and has a turnover of Rs 2 crore or more in a financial year will be covered under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA, 2002). The limit of Rs 2 crore would be calculated on the basis of the previous year’s turnover, said the notification. The directorate general of goods and service tax intelligence has been appointed under the Act. Sources said the government’s move to apply the PMLA to the jewellery sector was a fallout of income-tax raids on jewellers soon after demonetisation last November, when it was found that they sold gold and jewellery at a huge premium and accepted old currency notes as payment. The notification, issued on Augus…

Confusion over branded food GST

Confusion over branded food GST The GST Council's statement over the weekend on applying tax on branded food items has left most of the trade confused.

Even though the Council has not changed the rates on food -0 per cent on unbranded stuff and 5 per cent on brands -many small traders who didn't levy GST earlier said they could come under the 5 per cent slab after the clarification.

While they predicted some increase in consumer prices, large players said they can absorb GST in many ways and keep prices steady.

"Trade is confused and hence on behalf of our chamber, we have asked our members to go ahead and charge 5 per cent GST," said Sushil Sureka, general secretary of the Ahilya Chamber of Commerce and Industry in Indore.

The statement clarifying the application of GST came after some businesses were found deregistering their brands and selling under corporate brand name without paying tax, after the Council exempted unbranded food from the new all-encompassing indirec…