Skip to main content

HC Notice to Govt over Disqualification of Shell Cos' Directors

HC Notice to Govt over Disqualification of Shell Cos' Directors
The Delhi High Court has issued notice to the Ministry of Corporate Affairs and Registrar of Companies (RoC) on a petition challenging the disqualification of more than one lakh directors of shell companies.The Ministry of Corporate Affairs, last month, identified 1,06,578 directors of shell companies for disqualification.While issuing notices to the ministry, the HC also stayed the disqualification of three such directors.

Advocate Manish Jain, counsel for the petitioners, challenged the vires, Latin for powers, of Section 164 (2) of Companies Act, 2013 which was notified in the year 2014.Jain said that the section was wholly ambiguous, as it is unclear as to whether it is applicable only to existing directors or extends to all those who no longer are directors of the disputed shell companies.

“The vires of the section in question has been challenged,“ Jain told ET. He argued that the ministry had violated the principles of natural justice in disqualifying the directors. For, he contended, the directors were not even issued show-cause notices before disqualifying them.The petitioners have also contended that there was no provision under Section 164 (2) of Companies Act, 2013 for “immediate disqualification“ of a director.

Jain said the section is “unconstitutional“, as it is apparently applicable even to those directors who were not the directors of defaulting companies at the time of default and have vacated or quit the officer prior to the default.The government recently de-recognised 2.10 lakh companies that were dormant and utilised for dubious transactions. After de-recognition, the finance ministry directed banks to restrict operations of bank accounts of such companies by their directors or authorised representatives.

The ministry is further analysing the data of these companies from the Registrar of Companies, to identify the directors and the significant beneficial interest behind these companies.Under Section 164 (2) of the Companies Act, 2013, a director in a company that has not filed financial statements or annual returns for three years in a row will not be eligible for re-appointment as a director in that or any other company for five years.

The Economics, New Delhi, 13th October 2017

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

At 18%, GST Rate to be Less Taxing for Most Goods

About 70% of all goods and some consumer durables likely to cost less

A number of goods such as cosmetics, shaving creams, shampoo, toothpaste, soap, plastics, paints and some consumer durables could become cheaper under the proposed goods and services tax (GST) regime as most items are likely to be subject to the rate of 18% rather than the higher one of 28%.

India is likely to rely on the effective tax rate currently applicable on a commodity to get a fix on the GST slab, said a government official, allowing most goods to make it to the lower bracket.

For instance, if an item comes within the 12% excise slab but the effective tax is 8% due to abatement, then the latter will be considered for GST fitment.

Going by this formulation, about 70% of all goods could fall in the 18% bracket.

The GST Council has finalised a four-tier tax structure of 5%, 12%, 18% and 28% but has left room for the highest slab to be pegged at 40%. A committee of officials will work out the fitment and the council…

Coffee-Toffee, the GST Debate Continues

Hundreds of crores of rupees in the form of taxes ride on the exact categorisation of products Is Parachute hair oil or edible oil? Is KitKat a chocolate or a biscuit? Is a Vicks tablet medicament or confectionery? For the taxpayer and the tax collector, this is much more than an exercise in semantics -hundreds of crores of rupees ride on the exact categorisation.
As the government moves closer to rolling out the goods and services tax (GST) on July 1, many such distinctions are being debated so that no ambiguity remains. Not just that, the government is revisiting old tax cases that were lost over product categorisation, according to people with knowledge of the matter, presumably with a view to making sure that revenue collections can be maximised. “In the past, several tax officers had challenged some of the product categorisations, including those in the retail segment, but lost out in court or at appellate level,“ said one of the persons. “Now we have a chance to go ahead with speci…

Deposit gush:-CA Institute Bats for Special Audit