Skip to main content

GST Valuation rules under GST could lead to transfer pricing disputes

GST Valuation rules under GST could lead to transfer pricing disputes
As companies focus on the country’s biggest indirect tax reform — Goods and Services Tax (GST) — an old ghost of transfer pricing (TP) may come to haunt them in the coming years, warn tax experts.Transfer price is basically a price charged by a subsidiary or a division of a company to another. The rules suggest that there has to be an ‘arm’s length’ while fixing this price so that it’s not too low or too high than the existing open market prices. Tax officers can question and demand tax in case they suspect that companies are escaping taxes.
Unlike the earlier tax regime, GST has something called an open market pricing for related party transactions. Many tax experts feel that currently, the valuation rules under GST and those for calculating transfer pricing are not harmonised, and this could lead to future tax demands.Due to open market pricing for the related party transactions, goods and services, whether cross border or domestic, would now be subject to specific valuation rules.
There is still some confusion around whether the determination of open market pricing will be done based on the existing TP mechanism or whether different valuation rules would be framed, say tax experts. “Open market value may be required to be determined, although the current GST rules provide that where recipient unit is eligible for full credit, the value declared in the invoice shall be deemed to be open market value. The question is how to accommodate the timebased sensitivities of the  transaction specific indirect taxes with the annualised pricing determinations of the income tax,” said Rakesh Nangia, managing partner of Nangia and Co.
Transfer pricing disputes are mainly related to the calculation of profit made by MNCs and how they have been shifted to their parent companies. Many firms have gone to court, challenging the government’s transfer pricing calculations.Experts point out that indirect taxes are more time-specific — like time of supply is crucial –– and figures in valuation as well. Direct taxes work on the principle of aggregation — mainly based on the due date of annual tax return. Tax expert point out that it is possible that the same result can be reached under both tax systems with different approaches. “But harmony is not assured,” said a tax expert. While broader principles of valuations under GST have been announced, the precise rules are yet to be decided.
In the past three years, the tax department has gone out of its way to resolve transfer pricing issues. The tax department has been signing Advance Pricing.Agreements (APA) with multinationals to avoid future transfer pricing disputes.An APA is mainly an agreement between a tax payer - mostly multinationals — and the tax authority — CBDT in India’s case — where the transfer pricing methodology is determined. The methodology to calculate taxes could then be used for an agreed period of time on the tax payer’s future international transactions.
While transfer pricing until now was only limited to multinationals, recent changes in the tax laws would mean domestic  transactions would also come under its purview.With GST framework too dishing out valuation regulations for domestic transactions between related parties, tax experts fear that transfer pricing may find its way into several domestic situations.
The Economic Times, New Delhi  ,23th October 2017

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

At 18%, GST Rate to be Less Taxing for Most Goods

About 70% of all goods and some consumer durables likely to cost less

A number of goods such as cosmetics, shaving creams, shampoo, toothpaste, soap, plastics, paints and some consumer durables could become cheaper under the proposed goods and services tax (GST) regime as most items are likely to be subject to the rate of 18% rather than the higher one of 28%.

India is likely to rely on the effective tax rate currently applicable on a commodity to get a fix on the GST slab, said a government official, allowing most goods to make it to the lower bracket.

For instance, if an item comes within the 12% excise slab but the effective tax is 8% due to abatement, then the latter will be considered for GST fitment.

Going by this formulation, about 70% of all goods could fall in the 18% bracket.

The GST Council has finalised a four-tier tax structure of 5%, 12%, 18% and 28% but has left room for the highest slab to be pegged at 40%. A committee of officials will work out the fitment and the council…

Firms with sales below Rs.50 crore out of ambit

The tax department has reiterated that the PoEM rules, which require foreign firms to pay taxes in India if the effective control is here, will not apply to companies withaturnover of Rs.50 crore or less inafinancial year. Last month, the tax department had come out with the longawaited Place of Effective Management (PoEM) rules, which require foreign companies in India and Indian firms with overseas subsidiaries to pay local taxes if their businesses are effectively controlled by Indians. Then the rules did not setathreshold above which they were to apply. However, the accompanying press release states that the rules will not apply to companies withaturnover of up to Rs.50 crore inayear. That created confusion whether the threshold will be adhered to. Inacircular to clarify things, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) said the provision "shall not apply toacompany havingaturnover or gross receipts of ~50 crore or less inafinancial year".

PoEM rules essentially target shell …