Skip to main content

GST Hits Excise-free Zones; Pharma, FMCG Cos Worried

GST Hits Excise-free Zones; Pharma, FMCG Cos Worried
Firms petition govt after a new DIPP scheme offers them only 58% CGST reimbursement

A new GST reimbursement scheme has left Dabur, Godrej and many other FMCG and pharmaceutical companies worried about their manufacturing operations in Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand and some northeastern states where they used to enjoy excise duty exemptions.Apprehension has set in after the department of industrial policy and promotion (DIPP) last week unveiled guidelines of a scheme that replaces the erstwhile excise-free zones, offering 58% central GST reimbursement.

Companies that outsource manufacturing to job workers in these states have petitioned the government saying the new restrictions may render their businesses unviable. They are also exploring legal options.Many pharma companies including Cipla, Dr Reddy's, Johnson & Johnson and Wockhardt have plants in excise duty-free zones in Himachal Pradesh.TVS Motor, Lloyd Electric, TAFE and some other automobile component makers too have units in the hill state.
The new scheme, coupled with the fact that typically, the CGST rate is less than excise duty rate, means the absolute quantum of benefit gets reduced for the companies, say industry experts.Industry fears that the new guidelines would only cover the manufacturing cost of a product at the job work level. In the previous tax regime, companies used to get excise benefits on the maximum retail price of the products. “The new DIPP scheme does not highlight GST budgetary support to third-party units located in the listed states.
Basis our current understanding, GST budgetary support will be calculated on the value addition or the profits earned by third party processors. This will be much lower than the excise benefits enjoyed in the pre-GST regime,“ said Sameer Shah, headfinance (India & SAARC) and investor relations at Godrej Consumer Products.“It seems that if goods are ma nufactured by a third party, either under the job work or contract manufacturing model, the refund would be a function of the amount paid to such third parties, which means that the benefit might get significantly diluted,“ said Pratik Jain, leader-indirect taxes at PwC.

Industry has, as such, sought clarity from government on the new scheme.“We are in discussions with the authorities on this along with issues on timing, quantum of the state's share of GST budgetary support for owned units and also extending GST budgetary support to units that have made substantial investments in the listed states but have not commenced commercial production on the GST cutover date,“ Shah said.

Chief executive of a large foods and personal care company also said that they have sought clarification from the government on the scheme.Companies may have to relook at their businesses and also rework the pricing mechanism.“We are evaluating options and will take appropriate steps,“ said Lalit Malik, CFO, Dabur India.
The Economic Times, New Delhi,18th October 2017

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

New money laundering norms stump jewellery sector

New money laundering norms stump jewellery sector Dealers with turnover of Rs 2 crore and above covered; industry says threshold too low The central government has notified the money laundering rules for the gems and jewellery sector with immediate effect. Now, any entity deals in precious metals, precious stones, or other high-value goods and has a turnover of Rs 2 crore or more in a financial year will be covered under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA, 2002). The limit of Rs 2 crore would be calculated on the basis of the previous year’s turnover, said the notification. The directorate general of goods and service tax intelligence has been appointed under the Act. Sources said the government’s move to apply the PMLA to the jewellery sector was a fallout of income-tax raids on jewellers soon after demonetisation last November, when it was found that they sold gold and jewellery at a huge premium and accepted old currency notes as payment. The notification, issued on Augus…

Confusion over branded food GST

Confusion over branded food GST The GST Council's statement over the weekend on applying tax on branded food items has left most of the trade confused.

Even though the Council has not changed the rates on food -0 per cent on unbranded stuff and 5 per cent on brands -many small traders who didn't levy GST earlier said they could come under the 5 per cent slab after the clarification.

While they predicted some increase in consumer prices, large players said they can absorb GST in many ways and keep prices steady.

"Trade is confused and hence on behalf of our chamber, we have asked our members to go ahead and charge 5 per cent GST," said Sushil Sureka, general secretary of the Ahilya Chamber of Commerce and Industry in Indore.

The statement clarifying the application of GST came after some businesses were found deregistering their brands and selling under corporate brand name without paying tax, after the Council exempted unbranded food from the new all-encompassing indirec…