Skip to main content

DISQUALIFICATION OF OVER 300000 DIRECTORS MCA Calls Meet to Examine Grey Areas in Cos Act

DISQUALIFICATION OF OVER 300000 DIRECTORS  MCA Calls Meet to Examine Grey Areas in Cos Act
Ministry officials to also frame govt response as several debarred directors have moved court After several directors went to courts against their debarment by the government, the ministry of corporate affairs has called an urgent meeting to discuss if there are “grey areas“ in the Companies Act that need to be addressed.
A meeting of senior officials has been called on Monday to not just frame government response to these litigations but also to address any such grey area.The ministry in September cancelled registration of over 200,000 defaulting companies and, by extension, it had also debarred over 300,000 directors of companies.The amended Companies Act that came into effect in 2014 has provision for deregistering companies that fail to file returns.
Moreover, Section 164 of the Act provides that any person who is or has been a director in a company which has not filed financial statements or annual returns for any continuous period of three financial years shall not be eligible for reappointment as a director in that company or appointed in other company for a period of five years from the date on which the said company fails to do so.
With many such directors approaching courts, the government will review the provisions.“There are grey areas we have to get a clarity on,“ a senior official said. If the government finds merit in the arguments against the clarity in law, it can bring in a clarification in the form of a circular. “We do not want to unnecessarily burden the judicial system with endless litigations if some of the matter can be sorted out by issuing a clarification.But we still have to discuss this,“ the official added.
The high courts of Delhi and Madras have given notices to the corporate affairs ministry and the registrar of companies (RoC) on petitions challenging the disqualification of more than 300,000 directors.
Various corporate bigwigs including Pawan Goenka, managing director of Mahindra & Ma hindra Ltd, have managed to get an interim relief from court following their disqualification.Section 274 of the Companies Act of 1956 was limited to dealing with disqualification of directors of public limited companies. However, the Act was amended bringing in its purview private entities as well in 2014 through the Companies Act of 2013.
Another senior government official clarified that since a director gets disqualified “under the operation of law“, no notices were required to be sent to them but only to the non-compliant companies.Following the disqualification by corporate affairs ministry, directors have been barred from using their digital signature to sign any document.
The National Stock Exchange, taking note of the development, has also asked about 200 listed companies to consider whether directors who have been disqualified by the ministry should continue on their boards.Any person disqualified under Section 164(2) of the Companies Act, 2013 is advised not to act as director during the period of the disqualification and not to file any document or application with MCA as the same shall be summarily rejected, the corporate affairs ministry had said in a notice.
The Economic Times, New Delhi, 30th October 2017


Popular posts from this blog

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation Concerns about economic growth and easing inflation prompted five of the six monetary policy committee (MPC) members to call for a cut in the repo rate, but most warned that prices could start accelerating, show the minutes of the panel’s last meeting, released on Wednesday. The comments reflected a tone of caution and flagged upside risks to inflation from farm loan waivers, rise in food prices, especially vegetables, price revisions withheld ahead of the goods and services tax, implementation of house rent allowance under the 7th pay commission and fading of favourable base effect, among others. On 2 August, the panel chose to cut the repurchase rate—the rate at which the central bank infuses liquidity in the banking system—by 25 basis points to 6%. One basis point is one-hundredth of a percentage point. Pami Dua, professor at the Delhi School of Economics, wrote that her analysis showed “a fading economic growth outlook, as …

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

Differential Tax Levy under GST: Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks

Differential Tax Levy under GST:Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks The government’s decision to charge an enhanced tax rate on trademark food brands is leading several rice, wheat and cereal manufacturers to consider de-registering their product trademarks. Irked by the June 28 central government notification fixing a 5 per cent goods and services tax (GST) rate on food items packaged in unit containers and bearing registered brand names, the industry has made several representations to the government to reconsider the differential tax levy, which these players say is creating an unlevel playing field within these highly-competitive and low-margin industries. Sources say that the move has affected the packaged rice industry the hardest and allowed the un-registered market leaders, India Gate and Daawat, to gain advantage as compared to other registered brands such as Kohinoor and Lal Qilla. Smaller players are even more worried with this enhanced rate of tax (against the otherwise …