Skip to main content

Director disqualification hits 500 listed companies

Image
By
Director disqualification hits 500 listed companies
Exchanges send notices asking firms why their directors were disqualified by MCA
Stock exchanges have sent notices to listed companies that share directors who have been disqualified for associating with other firms which haven’t filed their financial statements or annual returns for three years.The notices ask such firms to explain why their directors have been disqualified and when the companies plan to replace them, said two people with direct knowledge of the matter. At least 500 publicly traded firms shared directors with suspected shell companies.
“The National Stock Exchange of India or NSE has so far sent out 307 notices to listed companies in two tranches seeking explanations on their disqualified directors. The first set of 210 notices were sent in last week of September and 97 notices were sent on Friday,” one of the two people cited above said on condition of anonymity.BSE Ltd has also identified 500 companies so far and is sending out notices to these firms. Mint could not ascertain the number of notices sent out by the BSE so far.
“The number could be larger as this is a preliminary assessment and more notices could be sent,” said the second of the two people cited earlier, also on condition of anonymity.A BSE spokesperson declined to comment.“NSE has sent out the letters to concerned companies and has sought clarification on the subject matter,” an NSE spokesperson said in an emailed response to queries from Mint.
On 12 September, the ministry of corporate affairs (MCA) issued a statement saying that it had identified 106,000 directors of companies that did not file their financial statements or annual returns for three straight years, violating provisions of the Companies Act, 2013. The names of the directors were subsequently made public.
As per the MCA directive, these directors cannot serve on the board of any company for the next five years. Some of the directors were disqualified retrospectively from November 2015.Any digital signatures by these directors on annual reports, financial results and other company documents will not be accepted by Registrar of Companies (RoC).
“While most of (the) firms are small with suspended share trading, about 50 companies impacted are larger companies and are in BSE top 500,” said the second person cited earlier.The names include some that are similar to those of prominent politicians and businessmen, including non-resident Indians. Mint couldn’t ascertain whether these directors were indeed public figures.
Even the exchanges are facing this difficulty “as in some cases there are only names and not the director identification number or DIN for clear identification”, said the second person cited earlier.“In some cases the names look familiar but DIN is not readily available for clear identification. In some cases the concerned director had stepped down from the company about seven years back so he/she cannot be associated with company,” added this person.Such directors are being encouraged to approach the MCA for a clarification, he added.
“Any action on directors of unlisted companies could have a spillover impact on the listed company space if they share common directors. While the Companies Act is seemingly ambiguous on whether these disqualified directors can continue to hold other functioning directorships, if and when these directors are asked to vacate their offices, it will step up demand for qualified directors from here on,” said Nikhil Bedi, leader (forensic practice), Deloitte India
The Mint, New Delhi, 10th october 2017

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

By
Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…
Post a Comment
Read more

New money laundering norms stump jewellery sector

By
New money laundering norms stump jewellery sector Dealers with turnover of Rs 2 crore and above covered; industry says threshold too low The central government has notified the money laundering rules for the gems and jewellery sector with immediate effect. Now, any entity deals in precious metals, precious stones, or other high-value goods and has a turnover of Rs 2 crore or more in a financial year will be covered under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA, 2002). The limit of Rs 2 crore would be calculated on the basis of the previous year’s turnover, said the notification. The directorate general of goods and service tax intelligence has been appointed under the Act. Sources said the government’s move to apply the PMLA to the jewellery sector was a fallout of income-tax raids on jewellers soon after demonetisation last November, when it was found that they sold gold and jewellery at a huge premium and accepted old currency notes as payment. The notification, issued on Augus…
Post a Comment
Read more

Confusion over branded food GST

By
Confusion over branded food GST The GST Council's statement over the weekend on applying tax on branded food items has left most of the trade confused.

Even though the Council has not changed the rates on food -0 per cent on unbranded stuff and 5 per cent on brands -many small traders who didn't levy GST earlier said they could come under the 5 per cent slab after the clarification.

While they predicted some increase in consumer prices, large players said they can absorb GST in many ways and keep prices steady.

"Trade is confused and hence on behalf of our chamber, we have asked our members to go ahead and charge 5 per cent GST," said Sushil Sureka, general secretary of the Ahilya Chamber of Commerce and Industry in Indore.

The statement clarifying the application of GST came after some businesses were found deregistering their brands and selling under corporate brand name without paying tax, after the Council exempted unbranded food from the new all-encompassing indirec…
Post a Comment
Read more