Skip to main content

Crucial year ahead for regulator

Crucial year ahead for regulator
It has been a hectic first year for the insolvency regulator, which hit the ground running.A year ago, when MS Sahoo went to work inasmall room in the building of the Institute of Cost Accountants of India, there were not many to assist him. The board itself comprised only nominee members.The first whole time member would join only five months later.But, Sahoo had tight deadlines.
The government wanted the entire corporate insolvency framework to be ready by December 1.Sahoo recalls how active participation from stakeholders helped him beat that tight 60day deadline.“This becameareform by the stakeholders, of the stakeholders and for the stakeholders,” he said in an interview.
Today, the board is better placed than in those early days.It has already moved to a more spacious office in the Connaught Place area.
Three whole time members have joined —Suman Saxena, who looks after research and regulation, Navrang Saini (registration and monitoring) and Mukulita Vijayawargiya (administrative law). Two parttime members are in the process of being appointed.
The board has six officers, and might need more.It has put in place the framework and has seen the market taking rapid strides, but the journey has only begun.The second year is likely to throw new challenges in the form of regulating, with hundreds of resolution plans reaching the completion stage and coming up for scrutiny.
Among these would be the big dozen cases, with over Rs 2 lakh crore riding on them.These highvalue transactions pushed through by the Reserve Bank of India have helped give the much needed visibility and impetus to the young framework.
Yet, banks or financial creditors still account for less than half of all cases.
A large number of cases continue to be filed by operational creditors such as customers and suppliers, while debtors themselves account for the rest.VG Kannan, chief executive, Indian Banks Association, said banks are overcoming initial teething troubles and warming up to the code.
“Banks are welcoming it.The borrower will be more careful.Earlier, they were content with being technically alive.
Now, with the Code, there is a possibility that they could be technically dead, too.” He added though the State Bank of India (SBI) is leading with the largest number of cases, even smaller banks have been moving National Company Law Tribunals.
“If you look at the list, you will see several smaller names.Just as they have been lending, they will take up with this process, too.” He feels the experience of dealing with the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) has prepared banks to some extent.
“This process is slightly different.But, with the rigid timelines, it´sabit more positive for the banks.” Lawyers agree the first year has been good.Sumant Batra, managing partner at Kesar DassB &Associates, said, “The experience of the first few months of implementation has reinforced the popular belief that IBC is largely a sound piece of legislation.
There hasn´t been any major disruption so far but that does not mean the path ahead is free of challenges.” The Code has faced complex legal challenges already, which throw the timelines into disarray.
Other challenges include getting the multiple lenders to get together and agree.Batra said, “The real test of IBC lies in the journey of the 12 big cases undergoing resolution.
They are already experiencing complex problems —one committee of creditors without a cap on numbers makes conducting meetings impossible, interim finance providers are not coming forward as the law restricts payment of interest after a liquidation order is passed, and there are uncertainties over approvals required for implementing plans sanctioned by NCLT.” Absence ofasufficient number of qualified and experienced insolvency professionals is another issue.
These need to be addressed on priority as failure of resolution of the big cases due to deficiency in law could cause disruption, feel stakeholders.Kannan added court decisions in cases such as Jaypee Infratech, where home buyers have staked claim, will be keenly watched.
The Business Standard, New Delhi, 03rd October 2017


Popular posts from this blog

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation Concerns about economic growth and easing inflation prompted five of the six monetary policy committee (MPC) members to call for a cut in the repo rate, but most warned that prices could start accelerating, show the minutes of the panel’s last meeting, released on Wednesday. The comments reflected a tone of caution and flagged upside risks to inflation from farm loan waivers, rise in food prices, especially vegetables, price revisions withheld ahead of the goods and services tax, implementation of house rent allowance under the 7th pay commission and fading of favourable base effect, among others. On 2 August, the panel chose to cut the repurchase rate—the rate at which the central bank infuses liquidity in the banking system—by 25 basis points to 6%. One basis point is one-hundredth of a percentage point. Pami Dua, professor at the Delhi School of Economics, wrote that her analysis showed “a fading economic growth outlook, as …

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

Differential Tax Levy under GST: Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks

Differential Tax Levy under GST:Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks The government’s decision to charge an enhanced tax rate on trademark food brands is leading several rice, wheat and cereal manufacturers to consider de-registering their product trademarks. Irked by the June 28 central government notification fixing a 5 per cent goods and services tax (GST) rate on food items packaged in unit containers and bearing registered brand names, the industry has made several representations to the government to reconsider the differential tax levy, which these players say is creating an unlevel playing field within these highly-competitive and low-margin industries. Sources say that the move has affected the packaged rice industry the hardest and allowed the un-registered market leaders, India Gate and Daawat, to gain advantage as compared to other registered brands such as Kohinoor and Lal Qilla. Smaller players are even more worried with this enhanced rate of tax (against the otherwise …