Skip to main content

Crucial year ahead for regulator

Crucial year ahead for regulator
It has been a hectic first year for the insolvency regulator, which hit the ground running.A year ago, when MS Sahoo went to work inasmall room in the building of the Institute of Cost Accountants of India, there were not many to assist him. The board itself comprised only nominee members.The first whole time member would join only five months later.But, Sahoo had tight deadlines.
The government wanted the entire corporate insolvency framework to be ready by December 1.Sahoo recalls how active participation from stakeholders helped him beat that tight 60day deadline.“This becameareform by the stakeholders, of the stakeholders and for the stakeholders,” he said in an interview.
Today, the board is better placed than in those early days.It has already moved to a more spacious office in the Connaught Place area.
Three whole time members have joined —Suman Saxena, who looks after research and regulation, Navrang Saini (registration and monitoring) and Mukulita Vijayawargiya (administrative law). Two parttime members are in the process of being appointed.
The board has six officers, and might need more.It has put in place the framework and has seen the market taking rapid strides, but the journey has only begun.The second year is likely to throw new challenges in the form of regulating, with hundreds of resolution plans reaching the completion stage and coming up for scrutiny.
Among these would be the big dozen cases, with over Rs 2 lakh crore riding on them.These highvalue transactions pushed through by the Reserve Bank of India have helped give the much needed visibility and impetus to the young framework.
Yet, banks or financial creditors still account for less than half of all cases.
A large number of cases continue to be filed by operational creditors such as customers and suppliers, while debtors themselves account for the rest.VG Kannan, chief executive, Indian Banks Association, said banks are overcoming initial teething troubles and warming up to the code.
“Banks are welcoming it.The borrower will be more careful.Earlier, they were content with being technically alive.
Now, with the Code, there is a possibility that they could be technically dead, too.” He added though the State Bank of India (SBI) is leading with the largest number of cases, even smaller banks have been moving National Company Law Tribunals.
“If you look at the list, you will see several smaller names.Just as they have been lending, they will take up with this process, too.” He feels the experience of dealing with the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) has prepared banks to some extent.
“This process is slightly different.But, with the rigid timelines, it´sabit more positive for the banks.” Lawyers agree the first year has been good.Sumant Batra, managing partner at Kesar DassB &Associates, said, “The experience of the first few months of implementation has reinforced the popular belief that IBC is largely a sound piece of legislation.
There hasn´t been any major disruption so far but that does not mean the path ahead is free of challenges.” The Code has faced complex legal challenges already, which throw the timelines into disarray.
Other challenges include getting the multiple lenders to get together and agree.Batra said, “The real test of IBC lies in the journey of the 12 big cases undergoing resolution.
They are already experiencing complex problems —one committee of creditors without a cap on numbers makes conducting meetings impossible, interim finance providers are not coming forward as the law restricts payment of interest after a liquidation order is passed, and there are uncertainties over approvals required for implementing plans sanctioned by NCLT.” Absence ofasufficient number of qualified and experienced insolvency professionals is another issue.
These need to be addressed on priority as failure of resolution of the big cases due to deficiency in law could cause disruption, feel stakeholders.Kannan added court decisions in cases such as Jaypee Infratech, where home buyers have staked claim, will be keenly watched.
The Business Standard, New Delhi, 03rd October 2017


Popular posts from this blog

At 18%, GST Rate to be Less Taxing for Most Goods

About 70% of all goods and some consumer durables likely to cost less

A number of goods such as cosmetics, shaving creams, shampoo, toothpaste, soap, plastics, paints and some consumer durables could become cheaper under the proposed goods and services tax (GST) regime as most items are likely to be subject to the rate of 18% rather than the higher one of 28%.

India is likely to rely on the effective tax rate currently applicable on a commodity to get a fix on the GST slab, said a government official, allowing most goods to make it to the lower bracket.

For instance, if an item comes within the 12% excise slab but the effective tax is 8% due to abatement, then the latter will be considered for GST fitment.

Going by this formulation, about 70% of all goods could fall in the 18% bracket.

The GST Council has finalised a four-tier tax structure of 5%, 12%, 18% and 28% but has left room for the highest slab to be pegged at 40%. A committee of officials will work out the fitment and the council…

Firms with sales below Rs.50 crore out of ambit

The tax department has reiterated that the PoEM rules, which require foreign firms to pay taxes in India if the effective control is here, will not apply to companies withaturnover of Rs.50 crore or less inafinancial year. Last month, the tax department had come out with the longawaited Place of Effective Management (PoEM) rules, which require foreign companies in India and Indian firms with overseas subsidiaries to pay local taxes if their businesses are effectively controlled by Indians. Then the rules did not setathreshold above which they were to apply. However, the accompanying press release states that the rules will not apply to companies withaturnover of up to Rs.50 crore inayear. That created confusion whether the threshold will be adhered to. Inacircular to clarify things, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) said the provision "shall not apply toacompany havingaturnover or gross receipts of ~50 crore or less inafinancial year".

PoEM rules essentially target shell …