Skip to main content

Advance Authority for Rulings in Demand to Clear Doubts on GST

Advance Authority for Rulings in Demand to Clear Doubts on GST
Fight for Forum Cos, associations approaching courts in absence of advance ruling mechanism
A few senior tax officials and corporates have requested the government to start Advance Authority for Rulings as early as possible to clear doubts on goods and services tax (GST), as this will prevent companies and associations from approaching courts for clarity .

Advance Authority for Rulings (AAR) is a forum companies customarily approach to get clarity on certain tax issues to determine their future liability. Absence of such an authority is leading to many companies and associations dragging the GST Council and government to court, say industry trackers.

At the last count, about 10 writ petitions were filed, challenging some aspect of GST. About half a dozen more writs would be filed in the next fortnight alone. The trigger may have been some prominent companies, associations and multinational banks having either moved court or with plans to do so.

ET had, on Sept 29, reported that Singapore-based DBS Bank had dragged the Indian government and GST Council to the Delhi High Court after it was asked to pay integrated goods and services tax (IGST) on banking services provided to its head office in Singapore. Some other writ petitions include the one filed by Rajasthan consultants for modification of compliance requirements, not charging interest, penalty, retrospective effect to late fee waivers, composition window and incomplete utility forms under the GST framework.

“The need for GST AAR to start functioning at the earliest is paramount as several businesses would like to have clarity on matters of classification, place of supply and input tax credit, among others,“ said MS Mani, partner, Deloitte India. “Delays would lead to businesses taking a tax position which could be subsequently challenged by the tax authorities, leading to avoidable litigation. The need for AAR is more during the initial period of GST when businesses are grappling with the challenges posed by a new legislation,“ said Mani.

However, a senior tax official told ET, “The government is sensitive towards some issues companies are facing, but instead of filing cases in courts, representations to the government could be a better solu tion. No clarification could be issued in situations where companies and institutions have approached the court, unless it is directed to us by these courts.“ He also added that the government will approach the Supreme Court in cases where the position taken by some companies or associations goes against the “very fabric of GST“.

In fact, Delhi High Court had questioned the government after a writ petition filed by an individual questioned why the AAR was not yet set up. In its reply on September 15, the government said that an advance ruling would be made available on the GST portal by January 15, 2018.

According to people in the know, the government is taking time mainly due to two reasons. “Selecting people with the right profile to head the advance ruling body is very crucial. Also, the IT integration part is taking some time.“

However, Delhi High Court has asked the government to set up an offline AAR facility by October 20.
A lawyer advising a multinational to ET, “Most multinationals want to avoid litigation, but there are a lot of issues in GST, and there is no clarity. How can one have a clear tax strategy if they don't know what is the government's position.“ The government had also told its tax officers in September to defend GST. 3

The Economic Times, New Delhi, 04th October 2017

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation Concerns about economic growth and easing inflation prompted five of the six monetary policy committee (MPC) members to call for a cut in the repo rate, but most warned that prices could start accelerating, show the minutes of the panel’s last meeting, released on Wednesday. The comments reflected a tone of caution and flagged upside risks to inflation from farm loan waivers, rise in food prices, especially vegetables, price revisions withheld ahead of the goods and services tax, implementation of house rent allowance under the 7th pay commission and fading of favourable base effect, among others. On 2 August, the panel chose to cut the repurchase rate—the rate at which the central bank infuses liquidity in the banking system—by 25 basis points to 6%. One basis point is one-hundredth of a percentage point. Pami Dua, professor at the Delhi School of Economics, wrote that her analysis showed “a fading economic growth outlook, as …

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

Differential Tax Levy under GST: Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks

Differential Tax Levy under GST:Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks The government’s decision to charge an enhanced tax rate on trademark food brands is leading several rice, wheat and cereal manufacturers to consider de-registering their product trademarks. Irked by the June 28 central government notification fixing a 5 per cent goods and services tax (GST) rate on food items packaged in unit containers and bearing registered brand names, the industry has made several representations to the government to reconsider the differential tax levy, which these players say is creating an unlevel playing field within these highly-competitive and low-margin industries. Sources say that the move has affected the packaged rice industry the hardest and allowed the un-registered market leaders, India Gate and Daawat, to gain advantage as compared to other registered brands such as Kohinoor and Lal Qilla. Smaller players are even more worried with this enhanced rate of tax (against the otherwise …