Skip to main content

Startups get 80% rebate on patent fee.

Startups get 80% rebate on patent fee.
More domestic and foreign startups will now be able to access the fast-track mechanism for filing patents, which will drastically cut down the time taken to obtain these rights. The government has introduced a more liberal definition for startups to ensure that many more of them can become eligible for benefits, including lower fees, under the latest patent framework.

Under the new definition, any entity in India recognised as a startup by the competent authority under the Startup India initiative will be eligible. In order to encourage patent filing, the government has amended the Patent Rules 2003. The rules notified on September 2, will allow startups to avail of a rebate in patent fees.

“A foreign entity, fulfilling the criteria for turnover and period of incorporation or registration as per Startup India Initiative” would be extended the patent filing benefits meant for startups, according to the notification.

Over the past year, the definition of startups, as notified by the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion, has been refined to include changes such as the inclusion of job opportunities as an important criterion. Startups were earlier defined as companies that are only five years old with a maximum turnover of Rs 25 crore per year and working towards innovation.

With the rules revised, startups will be eligible for an 80% rebate on patent fees. The DIPP will bear the facilitation cost on behalf of startups and provide rebates
 in the statutory fee for the filing of applications.

For the expedited patent registration, the startups have to pay double the fees against thrice the amount for other companies. Under the faster clearance route, the application fee for individuals and startups is Rs 8,000, while for established and older companies it is about Rs 60,000. To avail of intellectual property rights-related benefits, a startup is required to obtain a Certificate of Recognition from DIPP.

The amended rules seek to cut the time taken for granting patents to two-and-a-half years from five to seven years immediately and to one-and-a-half years by March 2018.

The Economic Times, New Delhi, 05th September 2017

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

At 18%, GST Rate to be Less Taxing for Most Goods

About 70% of all goods and some consumer durables likely to cost less

A number of goods such as cosmetics, shaving creams, shampoo, toothpaste, soap, plastics, paints and some consumer durables could become cheaper under the proposed goods and services tax (GST) regime as most items are likely to be subject to the rate of 18% rather than the higher one of 28%.

India is likely to rely on the effective tax rate currently applicable on a commodity to get a fix on the GST slab, said a government official, allowing most goods to make it to the lower bracket.

For instance, if an item comes within the 12% excise slab but the effective tax is 8% due to abatement, then the latter will be considered for GST fitment.

Going by this formulation, about 70% of all goods could fall in the 18% bracket.

The GST Council has finalised a four-tier tax structure of 5%, 12%, 18% and 28% but has left room for the highest slab to be pegged at 40%. A committee of officials will work out the fitment and the council…

Coffee-Toffee, the GST Debate Continues

Hundreds of crores of rupees in the form of taxes ride on the exact categorisation of products Is Parachute hair oil or edible oil? Is KitKat a chocolate or a biscuit? Is a Vicks tablet medicament or confectionery? For the taxpayer and the tax collector, this is much more than an exercise in semantics -hundreds of crores of rupees ride on the exact categorisation.
As the government moves closer to rolling out the goods and services tax (GST) on July 1, many such distinctions are being debated so that no ambiguity remains. Not just that, the government is revisiting old tax cases that were lost over product categorisation, according to people with knowledge of the matter, presumably with a view to making sure that revenue collections can be maximised. “In the past, several tax officers had challenged some of the product categorisations, including those in the retail segment, but lost out in court or at appellate level,“ said one of the persons. “Now we have a chance to go ahead with speci…

Deposit gush:-CA Institute Bats for Special Audit