Skip to main content

Sebi to turn the heat on audit committees

Sebi to turn the heat on audit committees
Regulator’s board meeting on Sept 18; to take stock of action against 331 suspected shell firms

Capital markets regulator the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) is likely to tighten norms pertaining to constitution and functioning of the audit committees for listed companies. These committees act as independent oversight bodies responsible for transparency and accuracy in functioning of company and the board.

According to sources, the markets regulator plans to look at how India Inc is appointing members on the audit committee, their qualifications and whether they are discharging their duties, without undue influence of the promoters.

‘Proceedings of audit committee and reconstitution of the same’ is among the top agenda of the Sebi board meeting scheduled on September 18, said sources. Other agenda items include the surveillance action report on 331 suspected shell companies, changes to infrastructure investment trust (InvIT) norms and appointment of a chief economist at Sebi.

This move comes in the wake of recent instances that put the spotlight on the role of audit committee members. Sebi had received complaints pertaining to the role of independent directors on the boards of listed companies. The complaints were about conflict of interest and wrong declarations made in the audit committee report.

According to the Companies Act, two-thirds of the audit committee of listed companies have to be made up of independent directors. Another third comprises non-executive directors.

“The rules are structured to provide strong oversight over a company’s financial statement, related-party transactions, and inter-corporate loans. However, the view within Sebi is that audit committees in most companies are rubber stamps. They are not fulfilling the entrusted role and responsibilities,” said a person with knowledge of the development.

The Sebi board is likely to deliberate ways to add more muscle to the audit committee, the person added.

Experts said Sebi should consider getting professionals on audit committees.

“The provisions related to role, responsibility and functioning of the audit committee is more of self-governance. It is time that a provision is made to appoint professionals who would be under obligation to report directly to the regulators rather than to the board,” said Rishabh Mastaram, founder, RGM Legal. Sources said Sebi might tighten audit committee compliance norms for big-ticket transactions. The regulator is particularly concerned over whether companies are following rules laid down for accountability and disclosure of inter- corporate loans. The mandate of the audit committee includes scrutiny of such loans and investments.

Besides, Sebi may also review the process followed in the reconstitution of audit committees. Experts believes that the reconstitution of the committee should have shareholders' approval. "It is important to ensure that appointment of new member or reconstitution should not be done by passing a simple board resolution. Besides, the directors have to be fair and independent and should be capable of decisions without being influenced by dominant shareholders. The independence should be both in letter and spirit and not just on paper," said proxy advisory firm InGovern MD Shriram Subramanian. Sebi is also likely to apprise the board members on the recent action taken against 331 “suspected shell companies”. The regulator is also likely to ease the InvIT framework. InvIT issuances dried up after just two issuances.

Also, Sebi, for the first time, is likely to create the position of a chief economist. The regulator is also likely to mull ways to ensure timely completion of pending investigations.

The Business Standard, New Delhi, 12th September 2017


Popular posts from this blog

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

New money laundering norms stump jewellery sector

New money laundering norms stump jewellery sector Dealers with turnover of Rs 2 crore and above covered; industry says threshold too low The central government has notified the money laundering rules for the gems and jewellery sector with immediate effect. Now, any entity deals in precious metals, precious stones, or other high-value goods and has a turnover of Rs 2 crore or more in a financial year will be covered under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA, 2002). The limit of Rs 2 crore would be calculated on the basis of the previous year’s turnover, said the notification. The directorate general of goods and service tax intelligence has been appointed under the Act. Sources said the government’s move to apply the PMLA to the jewellery sector was a fallout of income-tax raids on jewellers soon after demonetisation last November, when it was found that they sold gold and jewellery at a huge premium and accepted old currency notes as payment. The notification, issued on Augus…

Confusion over branded food GST

Confusion over branded food GST The GST Council's statement over the weekend on applying tax on branded food items has left most of the trade confused.

Even though the Council has not changed the rates on food -0 per cent on unbranded stuff and 5 per cent on brands -many small traders who didn't levy GST earlier said they could come under the 5 per cent slab after the clarification.

While they predicted some increase in consumer prices, large players said they can absorb GST in many ways and keep prices steady.

"Trade is confused and hence on behalf of our chamber, we have asked our members to go ahead and charge 5 per cent GST," said Sushil Sureka, general secretary of the Ahilya Chamber of Commerce and Industry in Indore.

The statement clarifying the application of GST came after some businesses were found deregistering their brands and selling under corporate brand name without paying tax, after the Council exempted unbranded food from the new all-encompassing indirec…