Skip to main content

Sebi firm on tweaking investment advisory norms

Sebi firm on tweaking investment advisory norms
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) may go ahead with tweaking its investment advisory guidelines for mutual fund (MF) distributors, even as it faces opposition from the latter.

In June, the markets regulator had proposed changes to the Sebi (Investment Advisers) Regulations, 2013, to prevent conflict of interest between “advising” and “selling” of investment products by the same entity or person. As part of its proposals, an entity offering investment advisory services shall not be permitted to offer distribution/execution services. Banks, nonbanking financial companies and corporate bodies have to form separate subsidiaries to offer advisory services.

Sebi had proposed to scrap the practice of using “independent financial advisors” by distributors. Instead, they would be called “mutual fund distributors” or MFDs, and will not be allowed to offer any investment advice or financial planning services. MFDs registering as investment advisors shall be allowed to receive trail commission for the products already distributed but will not be allowed to sell/distribute any product. Agencies/entities providing ranking of MF schemes shall be required to register under the SEBI (Research Analysts) Regulations, 2014.

Distributors believe the proposed move could increase mis-selling of MF products. “If distributors are not permitted to provide investment advice as an activity associated with their distribution function, they may sell products without a check on the investor’s risk profile and product suitability,” United Forum, a forum of national and regional associations of distributors and independent financial advisors, had stated in its feedback to Sebi’s proposal in July.

The move will create an unequal playing field between individual and institutional distributors. “While banks and corporate houses will easily be able to segregate advisory and execution, individual advisors who provide a composite service may not be able to do so,” said a sector official.

According to United Forum, converting a sole proprietorship into two firms will enhance conflict, reduce accountability and minimise financial restitution in the event the investor sues the distributor. Distributors believe the proposed changes will hamper the penetration of MFs in smaller cities. One of every Rs 4 invested by individual investors in MF schemes now comes from B15 cities.

The Business Standard, New Delhi, 01st September 2017


Popular posts from this blog

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

New money laundering norms stump jewellery sector

New money laundering norms stump jewellery sector Dealers with turnover of Rs 2 crore and above covered; industry says threshold too low The central government has notified the money laundering rules for the gems and jewellery sector with immediate effect. Now, any entity deals in precious metals, precious stones, or other high-value goods and has a turnover of Rs 2 crore or more in a financial year will be covered under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA, 2002). The limit of Rs 2 crore would be calculated on the basis of the previous year’s turnover, said the notification. The directorate general of goods and service tax intelligence has been appointed under the Act. Sources said the government’s move to apply the PMLA to the jewellery sector was a fallout of income-tax raids on jewellers soon after demonetisation last November, when it was found that they sold gold and jewellery at a huge premium and accepted old currency notes as payment. The notification, issued on Augus…

Confusion over branded food GST

Confusion over branded food GST The GST Council's statement over the weekend on applying tax on branded food items has left most of the trade confused.

Even though the Council has not changed the rates on food -0 per cent on unbranded stuff and 5 per cent on brands -many small traders who didn't levy GST earlier said they could come under the 5 per cent slab after the clarification.

While they predicted some increase in consumer prices, large players said they can absorb GST in many ways and keep prices steady.

"Trade is confused and hence on behalf of our chamber, we have asked our members to go ahead and charge 5 per cent GST," said Sushil Sureka, general secretary of the Ahilya Chamber of Commerce and Industry in Indore.

The statement clarifying the application of GST came after some businesses were found deregistering their brands and selling under corporate brand name without paying tax, after the Council exempted unbranded food from the new all-encompassing indirec…