Skip to main content

Sebi diktat may change essence of balanced funds

Sebi diktat may change essence of balanced funds
The Securities and Exchange Board of India’s (Sebi’s) proposed move to simplify category classifications of mutual fund schemes may lead to a change in the definition of balanced funds. The capital markets regulator has been going slow on approving balanced funds in the past few years and unofficially insisting on a 50:50 equity-to-debt mix for new scheme approvals. Currently, there is no standard definition of balanced funds.
Several fund houses already offer balanced schemes that have an equity allocation of 65 per cent or higher. This allows them to be classified as equity schemes, which enjoy a tax advantage over debt funds as capital gains become tax free after a year. Since most diversified equity funds offer a 70-100 per cent equity exposure, the regulator believes a balanced fund offering 65-75 per cent does not offer much differentiation, according to sector officials.
Fund houses, on the other hand, have been reluctant to launch balanced schemes with a 50:50 mix, fearing the schemes will lose out on performance to older balanced schemes that have higher equity allocations.
“When you say something is a balanced fund, it has to be a truly balanced fund. We don’t want the investors to regret later that they went by the nomenclature and didn’t find the fund to be balanced at all," G Mahalingam, whole-time member, Sebi, had said at a recent FICCI event.
Fund officials are worried that flows in the balanced category will migrate to the older balanced schemes with a higher equity allocation. “Within the industry, we have a caste system. So, if you came early and launched a balanced fund, you were given permission to launch multiple balanced funds. One could be a large-cap and one could be a mid-cap in which you could invest 90-95 per cent in equities. And, if you came late, you are told that only 50:50 debt-to-equity mix could be considered a balanced fund. It is important to create a level-playing field," Kotak Mutual Fund Managing Director Nilesh Shah had said at a recent Business Standard event.
The chief executive of a fund house said on condition of anonymity, “Sebi may insist on the merger of similar balanced schemes but is unlikely to ask fund houses to change the mandate or attributes of their older balanced schemes that invest more than 65 per cent in equities."
A large fund house recently engaged in a verbal spat with Sebi over the merger of its two balanced schemes, according to sources. The fund house argued that merging the two schemes would increase the size of the scheme to unwieldy proportions and be detrimental to the interests of investors.  One way fund houses have got around Sebi’s 50:50 diktat is by launching hybrid funds with an equity tilt. Since 2014, almost a dozen schemes have hit the market with an equity allocation of about 65 per cent and the rest in debt instruments. However, these schemes are not classified as balanced funds and are more defensive in nature, as over 25 per cent of the equity holding is deployed for equity arbitrage.
In the past three years, the assets of balanced funds have grown more than seven times to Rs 1.28 lakh crore as of August 2017, according to the Association of Mutual Funds in India data.
The Business standard, New Delhi, 21th September 2017

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation Concerns about economic growth and easing inflation prompted five of the six monetary policy committee (MPC) members to call for a cut in the repo rate, but most warned that prices could start accelerating, show the minutes of the panel’s last meeting, released on Wednesday. The comments reflected a tone of caution and flagged upside risks to inflation from farm loan waivers, rise in food prices, especially vegetables, price revisions withheld ahead of the goods and services tax, implementation of house rent allowance under the 7th pay commission and fading of favourable base effect, among others. On 2 August, the panel chose to cut the repurchase rate—the rate at which the central bank infuses liquidity in the banking system—by 25 basis points to 6%. One basis point is one-hundredth of a percentage point. Pami Dua, professor at the Delhi School of Economics, wrote that her analysis showed “a fading economic growth outlook, as …

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

Differential Tax Levy under GST: Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks

Differential Tax Levy under GST:Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks The government’s decision to charge an enhanced tax rate on trademark food brands is leading several rice, wheat and cereal manufacturers to consider de-registering their product trademarks. Irked by the June 28 central government notification fixing a 5 per cent goods and services tax (GST) rate on food items packaged in unit containers and bearing registered brand names, the industry has made several representations to the government to reconsider the differential tax levy, which these players say is creating an unlevel playing field within these highly-competitive and low-margin industries. Sources say that the move has affected the packaged rice industry the hardest and allowed the un-registered market leaders, India Gate and Daawat, to gain advantage as compared to other registered brands such as Kohinoor and Lal Qilla. Smaller players are even more worried with this enhanced rate of tax (against the otherwise …