Skip to main content

Sebi allows bourses to conduct forensic audit

Sebi allows bourses to conduct forensic audit
The logo of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) is pictured on the premises of its headquarters in Mumbai. 
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has empowered stock exchanges to conduct forensic audits on listed companies which seem dubious, being suspected of  use as conduits for illicit fund flow.
An authorisation letter in this regard has been issued to the bourses. The latter may take action in this regard on their own initiative. Sources say this is a sequel to the discussion between Sebi's surveillance department and the exchanges, on ways to curb such manipulation.
The regulator wants exchanges to review suspect companies on a weekly basis and select those for forensic audit. Till now, the exchanges did not have the authority to order this type of audit on their own.
A forensic audit is similar to a regular audit of a company's financial statement. However, the mode of examination or evaluation of the details are more specific. The attempt is to capture all related trails and transactions of a specific period when a fraud is suspected to have taken place.
The plan as approved is for an exchange to direct a company to send the auditor's certificate, with a list of disclosures. These include annual income tax returns for three years and description of pending tax disputes, if any. Further, status reports on compliance with the Companies Act and Sebi's listing regulations.
The exchange would then review their business models - whether or not it was doing well. Along with bank statements of the specific period when a possible fraud took place and the annual returns of three years.
"The details will be provided to the forensic auditors and accordingly they would scrutinise the data," said an exchange official. "Typically, exchanges have no say in the daily operation of listed companies. It comes to our notice when regulators raise red flags against such cases. So far, our action has been limited to coordination with the regulator."
The official added that it would be challenging for them to fulfil the new obligation. The move comes after Sebi was criticised for barring 331 "suspected shell companies" without conducting detailed background checks. At present, the exchanges are in the process of appointing experts to conduct forensic audits on at least 90 of this list of 331. The latter's list was provided by the ministry of corporate affairs in early August.
Sebi had barred all these companies from daily trading, though some got partial relief from the Securities and Appellate Tribunal. The action on these 331 companies was taken after a spike in trade was found during demonetisation. Many were reported to have been found to be violating the regulatory and income tax rules.
The Business Standard, New Delhi, 22th September 2017


Popular posts from this blog

At 18%, GST Rate to be Less Taxing for Most Goods

About 70% of all goods and some consumer durables likely to cost less

A number of goods such as cosmetics, shaving creams, shampoo, toothpaste, soap, plastics, paints and some consumer durables could become cheaper under the proposed goods and services tax (GST) regime as most items are likely to be subject to the rate of 18% rather than the higher one of 28%.

India is likely to rely on the effective tax rate currently applicable on a commodity to get a fix on the GST slab, said a government official, allowing most goods to make it to the lower bracket.

For instance, if an item comes within the 12% excise slab but the effective tax is 8% due to abatement, then the latter will be considered for GST fitment.

Going by this formulation, about 70% of all goods could fall in the 18% bracket.

The GST Council has finalised a four-tier tax structure of 5%, 12%, 18% and 28% but has left room for the highest slab to be pegged at 40%. A committee of officials will work out the fitment and the council…

Coffee-Toffee, the GST Debate Continues

Hundreds of crores of rupees in the form of taxes ride on the exact categorisation of products Is Parachute hair oil or edible oil? Is KitKat a chocolate or a biscuit? Is a Vicks tablet medicament or confectionery? For the taxpayer and the tax collector, this is much more than an exercise in semantics -hundreds of crores of rupees ride on the exact categorisation.
As the government moves closer to rolling out the goods and services tax (GST) on July 1, many such distinctions are being debated so that no ambiguity remains. Not just that, the government is revisiting old tax cases that were lost over product categorisation, according to people with knowledge of the matter, presumably with a view to making sure that revenue collections can be maximised. “In the past, several tax officers had challenged some of the product categorisations, including those in the retail segment, but lost out in court or at appellate level,“ said one of the persons. “Now we have a chance to go ahead with speci…

Deposit gush:-CA Institute Bats for Special Audit