Skip to main content

Jewellery sales halve in four weeks on PMLA extension

Jewellery sales halve in four weeks on PMLA extension
Jewellery sales have declined by around 50 per cent over the past four weeks, due to consumers’ deferring of orders amid fear of future action against them under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).

The government recently extended PMLA to the jewellery sector. This restricts cash transactions beyond Rs 50,000 without a Know Your Customer (KYC) declaration. This regulation, however, contradicts the income tax rule which permits cash transactions up to Rs 2,00,000 without a KYC requirement.

A delegation comprising bullion dealers and jewellers across the country is scheduled to meet commerce ministry officials on Friday to apprise them of the massive impact on their industry. In past years, jewellers had 30-40 per cent of annual sales during the ongoing festive season, beginning from Raksha Bandhan to the new year.

“Sales have declined by 50-60 per cent in the past few weeks,” said Surendra Mehta, secretary, India Bullion and Jewellers Association.

In a representation to the ministry of commerce, the body has sought a 10-fold increase in the cash limit for KYC requirement, to Rs  5,00,000. It argues the price of gold was Rs 500/g when PMLA was enacted in 2002. So, consumers could have purchased 100g with the Rs 50,000 cash purchase limit. The price is now Rs 3,000/gm, six times more.

“The PMLA regulation is good for the long term; we are not averse to it. But, we want the government to raise the cash purchase limit to at least Rs 2,00,000 for KYC. Most of our customers are women who save money from the lumpsum amount given by husbands. They normally accumulate their savings over a few months to buy jewellery, after achieving a threshold of Rs 50,000 or Rs 1,00,000. Calling for KYC from such customers would be unfair — they do not want to disclose such details. Their money so saved is not black and nor is their intention to use jewellery for any illegal purpose. Women consumers’ objective is to use this jewellery in need,” said Kumar Jain, director, Umedmal Tilokichand Zaveri, a bullion dealer and jewellery retailer at Zaveri Bazaar here.

Kumar adds that many consumers never return after finalising the purchase when asked for a PAN (income tax) or Aadhaar number.

The Business Standard, New Delhi, 08th September 2017


Popular posts from this blog

At 18%, GST Rate to be Less Taxing for Most Goods

About 70% of all goods and some consumer durables likely to cost less

A number of goods such as cosmetics, shaving creams, shampoo, toothpaste, soap, plastics, paints and some consumer durables could become cheaper under the proposed goods and services tax (GST) regime as most items are likely to be subject to the rate of 18% rather than the higher one of 28%.

India is likely to rely on the effective tax rate currently applicable on a commodity to get a fix on the GST slab, said a government official, allowing most goods to make it to the lower bracket.

For instance, if an item comes within the 12% excise slab but the effective tax is 8% due to abatement, then the latter will be considered for GST fitment.

Going by this formulation, about 70% of all goods could fall in the 18% bracket.

The GST Council has finalised a four-tier tax structure of 5%, 12%, 18% and 28% but has left room for the highest slab to be pegged at 40%. A committee of officials will work out the fitment and the council…

Coffee-Toffee, the GST Debate Continues

Hundreds of crores of rupees in the form of taxes ride on the exact categorisation of products Is Parachute hair oil or edible oil? Is KitKat a chocolate or a biscuit? Is a Vicks tablet medicament or confectionery? For the taxpayer and the tax collector, this is much more than an exercise in semantics -hundreds of crores of rupees ride on the exact categorisation.
As the government moves closer to rolling out the goods and services tax (GST) on July 1, many such distinctions are being debated so that no ambiguity remains. Not just that, the government is revisiting old tax cases that were lost over product categorisation, according to people with knowledge of the matter, presumably with a view to making sure that revenue collections can be maximised. “In the past, several tax officers had challenged some of the product categorisations, including those in the retail segment, but lost out in court or at appellate level,“ said one of the persons. “Now we have a chance to go ahead with speci…

Deposit gush:-CA Institute Bats for Special Audit