Skip to main content

IT dept steps up drive against cash abroad

IT dept steps up drive against cash abroad
The incometax (IT) department has established charges against five persons with unaccounted foreign assets of Rs 5,000 crore in the British Virgin Islands (BVI),aCaribbean tax haven.
Investigations are on in more cases.
According to sources in the tax department, these persons are from the gold and diamond export business, and have strong business operations in India as well.
The total undisclosed foreign asset held by them was worth Rs 5,000 crore.
These are among the 612 Indian residents named in the list exposed by The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) in 2013.
The consortium released information about thousands of secret companies, trusts and funds in offshore hideaways.
According to tax officials, these are “established” cases where they had made offshore investments and secret financial transactions, but it did not reflect in their tax statements.
These people are accused of holding shares/assets in undisclosed BVI companies.
This is the first big move in the investigation in the BVI list where the ITdepartment has found a significant amount of tax evasion by not disclosing their foreign assets.
“We have got material from various sources and tallied it with the profile of the persons and their disclosed assets in India and abroad.
The documents we are in possession with proved the existence of significant unaccounted foreign money,” said a senior ITofficial.
So far, the tax department has conducted its preliminary enquiry into 292 entities, which are incorporated in Mumbai.
Of these, 151 cases were actionable and are still under investigation.
According to sources, prosecution has been initiated in 15 cases and five of these will be heard in the Mumbai special court.
Other than this, the investigation wing of the tax department has sent 19 cases to the assessment wing.
The 19 account for Rs 3,117 crore of undisclosed foreign money.
Apart from this, searches have been conducted on at least seven renowned Mumbaibased individuals.
The search operations had seen several foreign bank accounts which were apparently undisclosed.In the case ofadiamond jewellery exporter,aforeign currency credit transaction of Rs 2,150 crore was detected.
In another case, the assessee was found to be the beneficial owner and held account in UBS AG Singapore.
“Some of the payments from this account were traced to bank accounts of his concerns in India,” said the official cited above.
The databases released by the ICIJ were parts of two larger databases that had been fed for nearly 30 years by two companies: Singaporebased Portcullis TrustNet, and Commonwealth Trust, based in BVI. Both firms specialise in setting up offshore financial structures.
They have helped tens of thousands of people create offshore companies and trusts, as well as hardtotrace bank accounts.
Most of them in the BVI list have signed documents and interacted with the Singapore service provider in the course of incorporating companies in the tax haven, explained official.
Soon after media reports on BVI companies, the Singapore firm which handled the deals had filed a complaint in August 2013 with the British Virgin Islands police about data theft.
In BVI, business companies need to have at least one director, eitheraprivate individual or a corporate entity, which may be resident of BVI or any other jurisdiction.
If the director is notaresident in BVI, the authorities may not be inaposition to provide information of the director, the official said. In suchasituation field authorities of the ITdepartment need to make separate exchange of information request to the country where the director isaresident. The counterparty tax authority cannot intimate the taxpayer as the latter may file an appeal against the supply of information.
Panama investigation hits a wall Meanwhile, income tax officials are unable to makeabreakthrough in the “Panama Papers leaks” case due to lack of information exchange from Panama´s competent authority.
Tax officials raised the concern inameeting held by the Central Board of Direct Taxes on Friday.
The meeting was called to take stock of the offshore matter and related investigations and also on Operation Clean Money.
On the Panama investigation, officials said that the information provided by the foreign authority were basic in nature and were insufficient to trace and prove the case.
The foreign authority has responded to Indian tax authorities that the offshore entities have been struck off and the legal periods of retention of documents has expired.
The Panama authority said they were not inaposition to retrieve and hence they couldn´t provide further details of the persons.Asenior ITofficial had visited Panama last week seeking support and coordination but it was notasuccessful trip, saidasource with direct knowledge.The Panama papers contain an unprecedented amount of information, including more than 11 million documents covering 210,000 companies in 21 offshore jurisdictions.
Each transaction spans different jurisdictions and involved multiple entities and individuals.
Soon after media reports on BVI companies, the Singapore firm which handled the deals had filed a complaint in August 2013 with the British Virgin Islands police about data theft.
The Business Standard, New Delhi, 09th September 2017


Popular posts from this blog

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

New money laundering norms stump jewellery sector

New money laundering norms stump jewellery sector Dealers with turnover of Rs 2 crore and above covered; industry says threshold too low The central government has notified the money laundering rules for the gems and jewellery sector with immediate effect. Now, any entity deals in precious metals, precious stones, or other high-value goods and has a turnover of Rs 2 crore or more in a financial year will be covered under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA, 2002). The limit of Rs 2 crore would be calculated on the basis of the previous year’s turnover, said the notification. The directorate general of goods and service tax intelligence has been appointed under the Act. Sources said the government’s move to apply the PMLA to the jewellery sector was a fallout of income-tax raids on jewellers soon after demonetisation last November, when it was found that they sold gold and jewellery at a huge premium and accepted old currency notes as payment. The notification, issued on Augus…

Confusion over branded food GST

Confusion over branded food GST The GST Council's statement over the weekend on applying tax on branded food items has left most of the trade confused.

Even though the Council has not changed the rates on food -0 per cent on unbranded stuff and 5 per cent on brands -many small traders who didn't levy GST earlier said they could come under the 5 per cent slab after the clarification.

While they predicted some increase in consumer prices, large players said they can absorb GST in many ways and keep prices steady.

"Trade is confused and hence on behalf of our chamber, we have asked our members to go ahead and charge 5 per cent GST," said Sushil Sureka, general secretary of the Ahilya Chamber of Commerce and Industry in Indore.

The statement clarifying the application of GST came after some businesses were found deregistering their brands and selling under corporate brand name without paying tax, after the Council exempted unbranded food from the new all-encompassing indirec…