Skip to main content

Govt sets in motion anti-profiteering mechanism

Govt sets in motion anti-profiteering mechanism
Businesses not passing on the benefits of lower tax incidence under the goods and services tax may be in for trouble, with the government notifying the standing committee to receive complaints on profiteering. A four-member standing committee, comprising two officers each from the Centre and states, will examine the complaints and refer cases for investigation if they find merit.

“If you have got any complaints, you can send it to the standing committee or state-level screening committee,” said Revenue Secretary Hasmukh Adhia at the Business Standard GST Round Table. The detailed procedure for approaching the committees will be announced soon, he added.

Meanwhile, states are in the process of notifying the state-level screening committees, which will also include central government nominees. The anti-profiteering law is a deterrent mechanism under the GST that makes it mandatory for businesses to pass on the benefits arising out of lower tax incidence from rate reduction or input tax credit to the consumer. It is a three-tier mechanism, with the final call to be taken by the authority not yet set up.

The price reduction must commensurate with the reduction in tax incidence. Erring companies will be asked to lower price of the product concerned prospectively and part with the amount profiteered before. The respective committees would refer cases for further investigation to the Directorate General of Safeguards. Complaints pertaining to local companies would be first sent to the state-level screening committee, whereas those of the national level would be sent to the standing committee.

“DG Safeguards would generally take twothree months to complete the investigation and send the report to the anti-profiteering authority,” said Adhia.

Manish Kumar Sinha, commissioner, Central Board of Excise and Customs, said that committees set up will soon come out with guidelines, which will give a clearer picture on the anti-profiteering mechanism. He added that the anti-profiteering authority will not be doing a roving investigation on who is passing on the benefit.

The Business Standard, New Delhi, 07th September 2017

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation Concerns about economic growth and easing inflation prompted five of the six monetary policy committee (MPC) members to call for a cut in the repo rate, but most warned that prices could start accelerating, show the minutes of the panel’s last meeting, released on Wednesday. The comments reflected a tone of caution and flagged upside risks to inflation from farm loan waivers, rise in food prices, especially vegetables, price revisions withheld ahead of the goods and services tax, implementation of house rent allowance under the 7th pay commission and fading of favourable base effect, among others. On 2 August, the panel chose to cut the repurchase rate—the rate at which the central bank infuses liquidity in the banking system—by 25 basis points to 6%. One basis point is one-hundredth of a percentage point. Pami Dua, professor at the Delhi School of Economics, wrote that her analysis showed “a fading economic growth outlook, as …

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

Differential Tax Levy under GST: Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks

Differential Tax Levy under GST:Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks The government’s decision to charge an enhanced tax rate on trademark food brands is leading several rice, wheat and cereal manufacturers to consider de-registering their product trademarks. Irked by the June 28 central government notification fixing a 5 per cent goods and services tax (GST) rate on food items packaged in unit containers and bearing registered brand names, the industry has made several representations to the government to reconsider the differential tax levy, which these players say is creating an unlevel playing field within these highly-competitive and low-margin industries. Sources say that the move has affected the packaged rice industry the hardest and allowed the un-registered market leaders, India Gate and Daawat, to gain advantage as compared to other registered brands such as Kohinoor and Lal Qilla. Smaller players are even more worried with this enhanced rate of tax (against the otherwise …