Skip to main content

Govt sets in motion anti-profiteering mechanism

Govt sets in motion anti-profiteering mechanism
Businesses not passing on the benefits of lower tax incidence under the goods and services tax may be in for trouble, with the government notifying the standing committee to receive complaints on profiteering. A four-member standing committee, comprising two officers each from the Centre and states, will examine the complaints and refer cases for investigation if they find merit.

“If you have got any complaints, you can send it to the standing committee or state-level screening committee,” said Revenue Secretary Hasmukh Adhia at the Business Standard GST Round Table. The detailed procedure for approaching the committees will be announced soon, he added.

Meanwhile, states are in the process of notifying the state-level screening committees, which will also include central government nominees. The anti-profiteering law is a deterrent mechanism under the GST that makes it mandatory for businesses to pass on the benefits arising out of lower tax incidence from rate reduction or input tax credit to the consumer. It is a three-tier mechanism, with the final call to be taken by the authority not yet set up.

The price reduction must commensurate with the reduction in tax incidence. Erring companies will be asked to lower price of the product concerned prospectively and part with the amount profiteered before. The respective committees would refer cases for further investigation to the Directorate General of Safeguards. Complaints pertaining to local companies would be first sent to the state-level screening committee, whereas those of the national level would be sent to the standing committee.

“DG Safeguards would generally take twothree months to complete the investigation and send the report to the anti-profiteering authority,” said Adhia.

Manish Kumar Sinha, commissioner, Central Board of Excise and Customs, said that committees set up will soon come out with guidelines, which will give a clearer picture on the anti-profiteering mechanism. He added that the anti-profiteering authority will not be doing a roving investigation on who is passing on the benefit.

The Business Standard, New Delhi, 07th September 2017

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

At 18%, GST Rate to be Less Taxing for Most Goods

About 70% of all goods and some consumer durables likely to cost less

A number of goods such as cosmetics, shaving creams, shampoo, toothpaste, soap, plastics, paints and some consumer durables could become cheaper under the proposed goods and services tax (GST) regime as most items are likely to be subject to the rate of 18% rather than the higher one of 28%.

India is likely to rely on the effective tax rate currently applicable on a commodity to get a fix on the GST slab, said a government official, allowing most goods to make it to the lower bracket.

For instance, if an item comes within the 12% excise slab but the effective tax is 8% due to abatement, then the latter will be considered for GST fitment.

Going by this formulation, about 70% of all goods could fall in the 18% bracket.

The GST Council has finalised a four-tier tax structure of 5%, 12%, 18% and 28% but has left room for the highest slab to be pegged at 40%. A committee of officials will work out the fitment and the council…

Coffee-Toffee, the GST Debate Continues

Hundreds of crores of rupees in the form of taxes ride on the exact categorisation of products Is Parachute hair oil or edible oil? Is KitKat a chocolate or a biscuit? Is a Vicks tablet medicament or confectionery? For the taxpayer and the tax collector, this is much more than an exercise in semantics -hundreds of crores of rupees ride on the exact categorisation.
As the government moves closer to rolling out the goods and services tax (GST) on July 1, many such distinctions are being debated so that no ambiguity remains. Not just that, the government is revisiting old tax cases that were lost over product categorisation, according to people with knowledge of the matter, presumably with a view to making sure that revenue collections can be maximised. “In the past, several tax officers had challenged some of the product categorisations, including those in the retail segment, but lost out in court or at appellate level,“ said one of the persons. “Now we have a chance to go ahead with speci…

Deposit gush:-CA Institute Bats for Special Audit