Skip to main content

Filing a case againstan e-tailer becomes easier

Filing a case againstan e-tailer becomes easier
The Supreme Court has recently upheld cases can be filed from the place of booking rather than the registered office of the company
While there has been a phenomenal rise in e-commerce, redressal of complaints was always been a sore area. For example, earlier, if an individual had made a purchase from Delhi and was unhappy with the product or service, the case could only be filed in the city where the company’s registered office was situated, say Bengaluru.
Things have become a lot simpler. The Supreme Court recently upheld the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission’s (NCDRC’s) order, which clarified from where an individual could file a complaint against an e-commerce company. A consumer can file a complaint in the city where he made the transaction or at the forum where the office of the company is located, according to the NCDRC’s and state forum's orders.
“We have been asking consumer fora to consider this for a long time. Going by the Consumer Protection Act, they always asked us to file a complaint with the consumer forum where the office of the e-commerce company was located. They didn’t consider the place where the consumer did the transaction,” 
says Arun Saxena, president, International Consumer Rights Protection Council. According to Saxena, the recent order will help consumers get speedy redressal to disputes as the issue of jurisdiction is now clear and resolved.
“The order considered the spirit of the Consumer Protection Act, which seeks to empower individuals to seek speedy relief without spending much,” says Nishit Dhruva, managing partner, MDP & Partners.
To provide relief to consumers, the court relied on the Information Technology Act, 2000, which says that if two parties enter into a contract for goods and services over the internet, it is deemed that the contract originated at the place where the goods or service provider is located and received at the place where the buyer places the order. For consumer cases, it will be the location of the device on which the goods or services were booked with the e-commerce player.
The order also gives consumers more options to choose a forum. In this case, the consumer had booked return flights from New Delhi to Bagdogra in West Bengal, which had a stopover at Kolkata for a change of airlines. While returning, the flight from Kolkata to New Delhi got cancelled. The consumer had to make fresh bookings and missed the connecting bus from Delhi to Chandigarh, her place of residence.
She filed a case in Chandigarh for relief from the airline that was to take her from Kolkata to New Delhi. The airline argued that the district and state forum didn’t have jurisdiction to hear the case since travel was on the Kolkata-New Delhi sector and the airline office was located at Gurugram. But the NCDRC said she could file a case at Chandigarh, Kolkata, Gurugram or New Delhi. “This is known as places where the cause of action occurs. It includes places where the contract is performed or is to be performed, where the money is paid or payable or where repudiation of the contract is received,” says Prashant Mali, an advocate and international cyber law and cyber security expert. As a result, territorial jurisdiction over a consumer complaint would lie with the consumer forum situated at any place where the cause of action arises.
The Business standard, New Delhi, 13th september 2017

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

At 18%, GST Rate to be Less Taxing for Most Goods

About 70% of all goods and some consumer durables likely to cost less

A number of goods such as cosmetics, shaving creams, shampoo, toothpaste, soap, plastics, paints and some consumer durables could become cheaper under the proposed goods and services tax (GST) regime as most items are likely to be subject to the rate of 18% rather than the higher one of 28%.

India is likely to rely on the effective tax rate currently applicable on a commodity to get a fix on the GST slab, said a government official, allowing most goods to make it to the lower bracket.

For instance, if an item comes within the 12% excise slab but the effective tax is 8% due to abatement, then the latter will be considered for GST fitment.

Going by this formulation, about 70% of all goods could fall in the 18% bracket.

The GST Council has finalised a four-tier tax structure of 5%, 12%, 18% and 28% but has left room for the highest slab to be pegged at 40%. A committee of officials will work out the fitment and the council…

Coffee-Toffee, the GST Debate Continues

Hundreds of crores of rupees in the form of taxes ride on the exact categorisation of products Is Parachute hair oil or edible oil? Is KitKat a chocolate or a biscuit? Is a Vicks tablet medicament or confectionery? For the taxpayer and the tax collector, this is much more than an exercise in semantics -hundreds of crores of rupees ride on the exact categorisation.
As the government moves closer to rolling out the goods and services tax (GST) on July 1, many such distinctions are being debated so that no ambiguity remains. Not just that, the government is revisiting old tax cases that were lost over product categorisation, according to people with knowledge of the matter, presumably with a view to making sure that revenue collections can be maximised. “In the past, several tax officers had challenged some of the product categorisations, including those in the retail segment, but lost out in court or at appellate level,“ said one of the persons. “Now we have a chance to go ahead with speci…

Deposit gush:-CA Institute Bats for Special Audit