Skip to main content

Car Cos Relieved After Crossing Cess Bump

Car Cos Relieved After Crossing Cess Bump
But luxury automakers, which will be impacted the most, criticise new rates

India’s popular and compact-car companies sounded relieved after the GST Council on Saturday raised the vehicle cess by less than the maximum possible, although luxury automakers were more circumspect in their assessment of the new rates.

After the increase, Honda City and Hyundai Verna should be costlier by about .? 20,000. Mid-market SUVs such as the Creta and Duster will likely see their prices rise by as much as .? 90,000. The increases are expected to be higher in the C and D segments. The Jeep Compass, Mahindra XUV, Tata Hexa and Toyota Innova will likely be costlier by as much as .? 1.2 lakh. Bigger SUVs such as the Toyota Fortuner, Ford Endeavour, Audi Q3 and BMW X1 will be pricier by up to .? 2 lakh while Luxury SUVs such as the Audi Q7 may cost up to .? 4 lakh more. The revised rates mean a partial reversal of the price benefits buyers initially enjoyed in the immediate aftermath of the GST’s July 1 introduction. Still, the total tax incidence on vehicles in the midsized, large and SUV categories will be lower by 1.6%, 3.8% and 5.3%, respectively, compared to pre-GST levies. But luxury carmakers such as Audi, Mercedes-Benz and BMW will be more affected by the increase in the cess, as these companies had benefitted the most from the initial decline in total levies.

“As far as Maruti Suzuki is concerned, there is no change. And a two percentage point increase in cess on midsized cars is neither here nor there, and would not make a difference… The market was absorbing the same prices two months ago,” Maruti Suzuki chairman RC Bhargava said.

“The question is, how quickly can he get the whole country with him. But the essence of what you are trying to do with some of the big initiatives is right and to the benefit of Indian economy. We are supportive of many of these initiatives because if it’s beneficial to India, it will be beneficial to HUL as well,” he said. HUL contributes about 9%, or 4.5 billion, to the Anglo-Dutch company’s overall sales versus the US that accounts for15%, or about 7.5 billion.

“I am not giving guidance but the assumption we double (in India) in the next 10 years or seveneight years is a no-brainer. Because US is not going to double,” Polman said. “India as an economy is going to do better than other parts of the world. If we fail, then we would be the first one to be very disappointed.” The optimism from Polman, who has been credited with turning around Unilever after taking over in 2009, comes against a backdrop of slowing consumer demand in India in the last two years. The company, regarded as a proxy for consumer sentiment in the country, saw sales rise 4% with an underlying volume increase of 1% last fiscal.

Polman, 61, was disappointed to miss the just-concluded Ganesh Chaturthi festival but will be carrying back figurines of the god of new beginnings and remover of obstacles back home to London. Demonetisation late in 2016 and the rollout of GST in July were regarded by some as obstacles to growth. “Demonetisation… was a big challenge to implement but from a strategic, long-term point of view, it is the right thing to do in India,” Polman said.

“In terms of GST, we had been working in a planned way for long for this smooth transition. We have certainly seen that translate into share increases among a big part of the business.” He said the first invoice under GST was issued by HUL. Unilever has been focusing more heavily on cutting costs, improving profit margins and boosting shareholder returns after the bid. This had resulted in the group’s share price rising 35%. The Indian arm mirrored the trend — at $40.8 billion, HUL accounts for a quarter of Unilever's market cap and saw its shares surge to record last week.

The Economic Times, New Delhi, 11th Septembr 2017

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

At 18%, GST Rate to be Less Taxing for Most Goods

About 70% of all goods and some consumer durables likely to cost less

A number of goods such as cosmetics, shaving creams, shampoo, toothpaste, soap, plastics, paints and some consumer durables could become cheaper under the proposed goods and services tax (GST) regime as most items are likely to be subject to the rate of 18% rather than the higher one of 28%.

India is likely to rely on the effective tax rate currently applicable on a commodity to get a fix on the GST slab, said a government official, allowing most goods to make it to the lower bracket.

For instance, if an item comes within the 12% excise slab but the effective tax is 8% due to abatement, then the latter will be considered for GST fitment.

Going by this formulation, about 70% of all goods could fall in the 18% bracket.

The GST Council has finalised a four-tier tax structure of 5%, 12%, 18% and 28% but has left room for the highest slab to be pegged at 40%. A committee of officials will work out the fitment and the council…

Coffee-Toffee, the GST Debate Continues

Hundreds of crores of rupees in the form of taxes ride on the exact categorisation of products Is Parachute hair oil or edible oil? Is KitKat a chocolate or a biscuit? Is a Vicks tablet medicament or confectionery? For the taxpayer and the tax collector, this is much more than an exercise in semantics -hundreds of crores of rupees ride on the exact categorisation.
As the government moves closer to rolling out the goods and services tax (GST) on July 1, many such distinctions are being debated so that no ambiguity remains. Not just that, the government is revisiting old tax cases that were lost over product categorisation, according to people with knowledge of the matter, presumably with a view to making sure that revenue collections can be maximised. “In the past, several tax officers had challenged some of the product categorisations, including those in the retail segment, but lost out in court or at appellate level,“ said one of the persons. “Now we have a chance to go ahead with speci…

Deposit gush:-CA Institute Bats for Special Audit