Skip to main content

Sebi softens stand as 'Shell firms' move SAT

Two days after suspending trading in 331 listed shell companies, the capital markets regulator, Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi), ordered stock exchanges to verify their credentials and fundamentals.
In a letter to the exchanges on Wednesday, the markets regulator hinted if  a company´s business model appeared satisfactory, the trading ban could be revoked.
The move comes after Sebi faced wide spread criticism from various quarters for classifying these entities as shell companies on Monday.
The market value of at least 10 companies on the list is over Rs 200 crore each.
Also 161 of these companies were active in trading, with over 2.7 million public shareholders.
Sebi had directed exchanges to impose stringent trading curbs on these companies by putting them in the Stage VI of the Graded Surveillance Measure (GSM). The companies were identified by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA), with the help of the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) and the income tax (IT) department.
Three of these companies —Prakash Industries, Parsvnath Developers, andJKumar Infra projects —also moved the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) against Sebi´s order.
They sought a stay on trading restrictions and claimed Sebi´s directives were “arbitrary and unreasonable”.
During the hearing on Wednesday, the SAT asked the regulator to explain under which law or regulation the action had been taken.
“Natural justice should have been followed before action was taken,” the SAT panel observed.
Sebi argued it had not concluded the companies are shell firms and the action had been taken based on a MCA list.
Legal expert said Sebi should be careful while passing such orders, as it could haveawide impact.
“Decisions that can have wideranging implications need to be carefully taken.
There may be many companies on this list that are indeed shell companies, but that cannot justify mistreating even one wellfunctioning company,” said Somasekhar Sundaresan, an independent lawyer.
Further, the appellate asked Sebi counsel when the MCA communication was received and whether it was brought to the notice of Sebi chairman or any member.
The tribunal also asked what steps Sebi took after the MCA provided it with information.
Mean while, the Sebi counsel questioned maintainability of the appeal stating that it was an administrative order and hence, not admissible.
Sebi argued it had not concluded the companies are shell firms and the action had been taken based on a MCA list.
SAT asked Sebi should giveahearing opportunity to all the three companies either before Thursday morning, failing which the tribunal will resume hearing in the matter.
The appellate also asked Sebi to respond on certain queries such as whether the officer who passed the impugned order had received the communication from the MCA.
It has also asked the regulator to file a reply on the due diligence done of the information received from the ministry.
The regulator´s surveillance department has directed stock exchanges to seek the auditor´s certificate from the companies, withalong list of disclosures.
These include annual incometax returns for three years and description of pending tax disputes, if any. Companies also need to provide status reports on compliance with the Companies Act and Sebi´s listing regulations.
Besides, the companies will also have to give a framework of their business models —whether or not it was doing well.
They would have to disclose loan defaults or if they had been declared as a non performing asset (NPA). 
They would also need to furnish bank statements for the past one year, both for active or dormant accounts, as well as the annual returns of the past three years.
Bourses have been asked to verify the auditor´s certificates and the documents provided by the companies.
Sebi in the letter, accessed by Business Standard, said the exchanges will have to give a hearing to the companies concerned and submit are port.
The regulator also asked exchanges to submit the status report of the brokers and their respective clients (investors). Sebi has instructed exchanges to ask brokers to check the credentials of their clients (investors). “In case the credentials of the client is not found satisfactory then their unique client code (UCC) should be temporarily disabled by the exchanges,” it said in the letter.
On the other hand, the government also indicated that some of the companies might soon resume trading.
“We expect about a dozen companies might be allowed to resume trading with in a week,” said a finance ministry official.
Action against the identified companies was taken afteraspike in trade was found during demonetisation, he added.
“Many have been found to be violating the incometax rules.
These companies, however, will be givenachance to prove their position,” said the official.
The Business Standard, New Delhi, 10th August 2017


Popular posts from this blog

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation Concerns about economic growth and easing inflation prompted five of the six monetary policy committee (MPC) members to call for a cut in the repo rate, but most warned that prices could start accelerating, show the minutes of the panel’s last meeting, released on Wednesday. The comments reflected a tone of caution and flagged upside risks to inflation from farm loan waivers, rise in food prices, especially vegetables, price revisions withheld ahead of the goods and services tax, implementation of house rent allowance under the 7th pay commission and fading of favourable base effect, among others. On 2 August, the panel chose to cut the repurchase rate—the rate at which the central bank infuses liquidity in the banking system—by 25 basis points to 6%. One basis point is one-hundredth of a percentage point. Pami Dua, professor at the Delhi School of Economics, wrote that her analysis showed “a fading economic growth outlook, as …

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

Differential Tax Levy under GST: Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks

Differential Tax Levy under GST:Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks The government’s decision to charge an enhanced tax rate on trademark food brands is leading several rice, wheat and cereal manufacturers to consider de-registering their product trademarks. Irked by the June 28 central government notification fixing a 5 per cent goods and services tax (GST) rate on food items packaged in unit containers and bearing registered brand names, the industry has made several representations to the government to reconsider the differential tax levy, which these players say is creating an unlevel playing field within these highly-competitive and low-margin industries. Sources say that the move has affected the packaged rice industry the hardest and allowed the un-registered market leaders, India Gate and Daawat, to gain advantage as compared to other registered brands such as Kohinoor and Lal Qilla. Smaller players are even more worried with this enhanced rate of tax (against the otherwise …