Skip to main content

Sebi May Bring Rules for Merger of MF Schemes

Sebi May Bring Rules for Merger of MF Schemes
Move expected to improve transparency and reduce confusion for MF investors
India's capital markets regulator intends to introduce rules that will force mutual funds to merge schemes in the same investment categories, driving long-pending consolidation in an industry that has hitherto ignored informal requests for ending the surfeit of plans.
Broadly put, if a mutual fund has two equity schemes with mandates to invest in large-cap stocks, the asset manager will have to merge the investment products once the new rules proposed by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) kick in. The step is aimed at improving transparency and reducing the clutter for investors.
The Sebi-appointed mutual fund advisory panel, scheduled to meet September 1, will discuss the matter, said three people familiar with the development. Exact details of the proposed rules could not be ascertained, but one official said the norms will require clear categorisation of mutual fund schemes, and aim to eliminate product ambiguities.
For about a decade, the regulator has been informally nudging mutual-fund houses to merge schemes with similar attributes. But with the industry resisting such moves, Sebi has been forced to come out with the proposed set of rules.
“Mutual funds have not responded to Sebi's persuasion for years. So, now it has decided to come out with the rules,“ said a senior mutual fund industry official privy to the matter.
In June, Sebi chairman Ajay Tyagi stressed the need for consolidation of schemes.
In India, 42 asset managers handle more than Rs.19.5 lakh crore across 2,000 MF schemes.Sebi has maintained that the number is high, and is causing confusion among investors who have to choose from an abundance of similar products. In an attempt to push the merger, the regulator had stopped giving several mutual funds the for floating new schemes. Most funds withstood the regulatory pressure as a wider product basket has helped them gather more assets, boosting profitability.
“Mutual funds do not really benefit from consolidation,“ said Manoj Nagpal, chief executive, Outlook Asia Capital, an investment advisor. “The probability of one scheme doing better than a similar one at any point always works for the mutual fund.“
Nagpal said the industry could also be worried that consolidation of schemes could impact the total expense ratio--the fee that funds charge investors every year for managing their money .“At some stage, bigger schemes will have to bring down their expense ratio. This will impact their profitability,“ he said.
The government, in the previous two annual Budget announcements, had paved the way for mutual-fund scheme mergers by removing tax anomalies.Earlier, mutual fund investors were deemed new subscribers for taxation purposes if a scheme merged with another. This meant investors had to pay short-term capital gains tax of 15% for an equity scheme if they exited it within a year. The Budget this year clarified that such a merger would be considered as a continued investment, which means there would be no taxes if an investor exits within a year of the merger.
A top mutual fund official said consolidation of schemes will bring a `level-playing field' in the industry.
“Hopefully, now Sebi will give permission to mutual funds to launch schemes that they do not have,“ the chief executive of a mutual fund said, requesting anonymity.
The Economic Times, New Delhi, 28th August 2017


Popular posts from this blog

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation Concerns about economic growth and easing inflation prompted five of the six monetary policy committee (MPC) members to call for a cut in the repo rate, but most warned that prices could start accelerating, show the minutes of the panel’s last meeting, released on Wednesday. The comments reflected a tone of caution and flagged upside risks to inflation from farm loan waivers, rise in food prices, especially vegetables, price revisions withheld ahead of the goods and services tax, implementation of house rent allowance under the 7th pay commission and fading of favourable base effect, among others. On 2 August, the panel chose to cut the repurchase rate—the rate at which the central bank infuses liquidity in the banking system—by 25 basis points to 6%. One basis point is one-hundredth of a percentage point. Pami Dua, professor at the Delhi School of Economics, wrote that her analysis showed “a fading economic growth outlook, as …

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

Differential Tax Levy under GST: Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks

Differential Tax Levy under GST:Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks The government’s decision to charge an enhanced tax rate on trademark food brands is leading several rice, wheat and cereal manufacturers to consider de-registering their product trademarks. Irked by the June 28 central government notification fixing a 5 per cent goods and services tax (GST) rate on food items packaged in unit containers and bearing registered brand names, the industry has made several representations to the government to reconsider the differential tax levy, which these players say is creating an unlevel playing field within these highly-competitive and low-margin industries. Sources say that the move has affected the packaged rice industry the hardest and allowed the un-registered market leaders, India Gate and Daawat, to gain advantage as compared to other registered brands such as Kohinoor and Lal Qilla. Smaller players are even more worried with this enhanced rate of tax (against the otherwise …