Skip to main content

Sale of scrips under export promotion schemes to attract 12% GST

Exporters will now have to shell out the goods and services tax (GST) at 12 per cent when selling scrips of export incentive schemes such as the Merchandise Export from India Scheme (MEIS).
The government on Thursday clarified that scrips received by exporters under the Services Exports from India Scheme and the Incremental Export Incentivization Scheme, apart from the MEIS, will be taxed.
Exporters earn duty credits through the form of scrips at fixed rates of 2 per cent, 3 per cent, and 5 per cent, depending upon the product and country.
The earned scrips can be freely transferred to others or sold.
Exporters have continued to maintain that more government help is needed to sustain India´s falling outbound trade.
“MEIS etc fall under heading 4907 and attract 12 per cent GST,” the Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC) said in its frequently asked questions on the GST.
The GST is based onacategory of goods and services based on the harmonised system number (HSN) codes.
HSN 4907 relates to financial securities such as shares and bond certificates, and bank notes, cheque forms, etc.
Exporters are up in arms with the FAQs and demanded that exportincentive scrips such as the MEIS be madeaseparate category withadifferent HSN code, and the rate be reduced to 5 per cent.
Sources said the GST Council might take up the demand at its meeting on Saturday.
“What is the legal sanctity of FAQs? It´s not a notification.
It´s an interpretation,” Federation of Indian Export Organisation Director General and Chief Executive Officer Ajay Sahai told Business Standard.
The CBEC also said in its disclaimer to FAQs that these clarifications were only for educational and guidance purposes and did not have legal validity.
Explaining the rationale of exporters´ demand to cut the rate on the MEIS to 5 per cent, he said those buying the scrips would have to wait to utilise the MEIS for tax purposes if the GST on their products is 5 per cent.
The premium on the scrips is going to drop asaresult of this, the executive director of the Engineering Exports Promotion Council of India said.
The largest of such export promotion schemes in the form of scrips, the MEIS, was introduced in April 2015 under the Foreign Trade Policy and currently incentivises merchandise exports along with 7,913 items.
The Business Standard, New Delhi, 04th August 2017


Popular posts from this blog

At 18%, GST Rate to be Less Taxing for Most Goods

About 70% of all goods and some consumer durables likely to cost less

A number of goods such as cosmetics, shaving creams, shampoo, toothpaste, soap, plastics, paints and some consumer durables could become cheaper under the proposed goods and services tax (GST) regime as most items are likely to be subject to the rate of 18% rather than the higher one of 28%.

India is likely to rely on the effective tax rate currently applicable on a commodity to get a fix on the GST slab, said a government official, allowing most goods to make it to the lower bracket.

For instance, if an item comes within the 12% excise slab but the effective tax is 8% due to abatement, then the latter will be considered for GST fitment.

Going by this formulation, about 70% of all goods could fall in the 18% bracket.

The GST Council has finalised a four-tier tax structure of 5%, 12%, 18% and 28% but has left room for the highest slab to be pegged at 40%. A committee of officials will work out the fitment and the council…

Coffee-Toffee, the GST Debate Continues

Hundreds of crores of rupees in the form of taxes ride on the exact categorisation of products Is Parachute hair oil or edible oil? Is KitKat a chocolate or a biscuit? Is a Vicks tablet medicament or confectionery? For the taxpayer and the tax collector, this is much more than an exercise in semantics -hundreds of crores of rupees ride on the exact categorisation.
As the government moves closer to rolling out the goods and services tax (GST) on July 1, many such distinctions are being debated so that no ambiguity remains. Not just that, the government is revisiting old tax cases that were lost over product categorisation, according to people with knowledge of the matter, presumably with a view to making sure that revenue collections can be maximised. “In the past, several tax officers had challenged some of the product categorisations, including those in the retail segment, but lost out in court or at appellate level,“ said one of the persons. “Now we have a chance to go ahead with speci…

Deposit gush:-CA Institute Bats for Special Audit