Skip to main content

P-note investors return to Mauritius as FPIs

P-note investors return to Mauritius as FPIs
Even as participatory notes (P-notes) become unattractive for taking positions, many investors are now looking to enter India using the foreign portfolio investment (FPI) route either through Mauritius or directly. 
P-notes are overseas derivative instruments with Indian stocks as their underlying assets. Industry trackers say some P-note holders are looking to directly invest in India without setting up an investment arm in a buffer country .However, some of the other investors could route their investments through Mauritius. 
The persons cited earlier said the newly registered FPIs will fall under category-III definition of the government and could start attracting higher taxes, going ahead. 
Many P-note holders invest in In dian futures and options (F&O) on which they did not pay any tax until recently. Also the instrument provided anonymity to these investors. However, the market regulator recently took two steps that forced investors out of P-notes.First is the insistence that KYC (know your customer) norms be followed strictly. Markets regulator Sebi also banned P-notes on derivatives last month. 
“Several P-note holders had to square off their positions in India due to the recent change in regulations, which has made it extremely hard to invest in the F&O segment unless that is done for hedging position on the same equity , which is not common. Now, some of these investors are looking to set up FPIs and invest in India directly from their country of origin, but that could attract up to 30% tax in India on the derivative returns,“ said Rajesh H Gandhi, partner, Deloitte Haskins & Sells.
Many FPIs are looking to come through Mauritius as the tax rate could be about 15%. However, there could be some risks if proper guidelines are not followed, say experts. FPIs may face scrutiny from Indian tax authorities over General Anti-Avoidance Rule (GAAR), Place of Effective Management (POEM) and they will have to display, without doubt, that the destination is not merely used for tax arbitrage. 
“Mauritius continues to be a preferred jurisdiction, especially for making investments in non-equity securities. The FPIs, however, would need to be compliant with GAAR, POEM and Principal Purpose Test guidelines in order to avail the treaty benefits,“ said Punit Shah, partner, Dhruva Advisors. Many investment banks have already commenced comparative analysis as to which destination could be better for them to enter India. Many of the category-III FPIs are flocking back to Mauritius as the destination provides cheaper operational cost. 
Recently, India also signed MLI (multi-lateral instruments) -a common tax agreement which could lead to uniform tax regulations for all investors, irrespective of which destination they come from. India is one of the 80odd countries that signed the MLI.It is expected that in the next two years, India will start adopting MLI, which could lead to uniformity of taxation for investors.
Many investment banks and prime brokers had started marketing P-note products aggressively in March this year. Until March 31, many FPIs invested in India through investment vehicles registered in tax havens such as Mauritius, Singapore and Cyprus. The government amended treaties with these countries and now tax will be levied on short-term capital gains on all investments made through these vehicles, beginning April 1. This had pushed several investors to explore P-note options.However, However, Sebi's tightening of norms has led to many investors again setting up FPIs. 
While the bigger investors, like hedge funds and pension funds, may not face difficulties, as they are exempted from several regulations like indirect transfer of shares, category-III FPIs could face more scrutiny from Indian tax authorities as they are not exempted from such regulations.
The Economic Times, New Delhi, 19th August 2017


Popular posts from this blog

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

New money laundering norms stump jewellery sector

New money laundering norms stump jewellery sector Dealers with turnover of Rs 2 crore and above covered; industry says threshold too low The central government has notified the money laundering rules for the gems and jewellery sector with immediate effect. Now, any entity deals in precious metals, precious stones, or other high-value goods and has a turnover of Rs 2 crore or more in a financial year will be covered under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA, 2002). The limit of Rs 2 crore would be calculated on the basis of the previous year’s turnover, said the notification. The directorate general of goods and service tax intelligence has been appointed under the Act. Sources said the government’s move to apply the PMLA to the jewellery sector was a fallout of income-tax raids on jewellers soon after demonetisation last November, when it was found that they sold gold and jewellery at a huge premium and accepted old currency notes as payment. The notification, issued on Augus…

Confusion over branded food GST

Confusion over branded food GST The GST Council's statement over the weekend on applying tax on branded food items has left most of the trade confused.

Even though the Council has not changed the rates on food -0 per cent on unbranded stuff and 5 per cent on brands -many small traders who didn't levy GST earlier said they could come under the 5 per cent slab after the clarification.

While they predicted some increase in consumer prices, large players said they can absorb GST in many ways and keep prices steady.

"Trade is confused and hence on behalf of our chamber, we have asked our members to go ahead and charge 5 per cent GST," said Sushil Sureka, general secretary of the Ahilya Chamber of Commerce and Industry in Indore.

The statement clarifying the application of GST came after some businesses were found deregistering their brands and selling under corporate brand name without paying tax, after the Council exempted unbranded food from the new all-encompassing indirec…