Skip to main content

GST breather for Railways; no tax on transfer of goods for self-consumption

GST breather for Railways; no tax on transfer of goods for self-consumption
No exemption would be available if the transaction is classified as a good
In a welcome break for the Indian Railways, no goods and services tax (GST) will be applicable on inter- or intra-state transfer of equipment/materials (without transfer of title) for self-consumption. This is a major relief for the railways, with annual internal consumption estimated to be about Rs 20,000 crore.
In a notification to field units on July 11, the railways said, “Transfer of goods/stores from one state/Union Territory (UT) to another state/UT is considered to be an exempted activity.” The notification cited section 7 (1) of the CGST Act 2017, along with clause 1(b) the Schedule II of the CGST Act, 2017 for the said exemption.
Experts corroborated this, claiming that according to the GST Act, transfer of goods by any government — Centre or state — or local authority to a similar government unit, is exempt from the indirect tax.
“Transfer of such equipment (without transfer of title) qualifies as a service as per the CGST Act,” said Saloni Roy, senior director, Deloitte Haskins & Sells. 
But here’s the catch: GST experts said the railways claiming transfer of goods as a service could lead to disputes. 
“The supply transaction between two interstate branches may not necessarily be accepted as a transfer of right in goods (defined as ‘service’), and more likely to be treated as the transfer of goods,” said Sachin Menon, partner and head, indirect tax at KPMG in India. 
No exemption would be available if the transaction is classified as a good.
Roy, however, added such exemption has been provided specifically to services between government agencies. If the claim of the railways is accepted, then the inter-state transfer of all goods for self-consumption will be exempted in the case of supply between governments and local bodies, noted experts. 
In June this year, the Ministry of Railways had pitched with Ministry of Finance and the GST Council that the transporter should be considered as a unified entity for purpose of the indirect tax, as it will have to register each of its 17 zones or 73 divisions in all the states under the new regime. It seems this request by the railways has not been accepted.
R Sivadasan, the former financial commissioner of railways, pointed out despite its complex structure of several zones and division, Railways has adapted itself well to the GST regime.
“The exemption is going to be a huge boost for the railways,” he added. 
Earlier this year, the railways appointed law firm Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan to advise it on GST implementation.
The Business Standard, New Delhi, 09th August 2017


Popular posts from this blog

At 18%, GST Rate to be Less Taxing for Most Goods

About 70% of all goods and some consumer durables likely to cost less

A number of goods such as cosmetics, shaving creams, shampoo, toothpaste, soap, plastics, paints and some consumer durables could become cheaper under the proposed goods and services tax (GST) regime as most items are likely to be subject to the rate of 18% rather than the higher one of 28%.

India is likely to rely on the effective tax rate currently applicable on a commodity to get a fix on the GST slab, said a government official, allowing most goods to make it to the lower bracket.

For instance, if an item comes within the 12% excise slab but the effective tax is 8% due to abatement, then the latter will be considered for GST fitment.

Going by this formulation, about 70% of all goods could fall in the 18% bracket.

The GST Council has finalised a four-tier tax structure of 5%, 12%, 18% and 28% but has left room for the highest slab to be pegged at 40%. A committee of officials will work out the fitment and the council…

Coffee-Toffee, the GST Debate Continues

Hundreds of crores of rupees in the form of taxes ride on the exact categorisation of products Is Parachute hair oil or edible oil? Is KitKat a chocolate or a biscuit? Is a Vicks tablet medicament or confectionery? For the taxpayer and the tax collector, this is much more than an exercise in semantics -hundreds of crores of rupees ride on the exact categorisation.
As the government moves closer to rolling out the goods and services tax (GST) on July 1, many such distinctions are being debated so that no ambiguity remains. Not just that, the government is revisiting old tax cases that were lost over product categorisation, according to people with knowledge of the matter, presumably with a view to making sure that revenue collections can be maximised. “In the past, several tax officers had challenged some of the product categorisations, including those in the retail segment, but lost out in court or at appellate level,“ said one of the persons. “Now we have a chance to go ahead with speci…

Deposit gush:-CA Institute Bats for Special Audit