Skip to main content

GST breather for Railways; no tax on transfer of goods for self-consumption

GST breather for Railways; no tax on transfer of goods for self-consumption
No exemption would be available if the transaction is classified as a good
In a welcome break for the Indian Railways, no goods and services tax (GST) will be applicable on inter- or intra-state transfer of equipment/materials (without transfer of title) for self-consumption. This is a major relief for the railways, with annual internal consumption estimated to be about Rs 20,000 crore.
In a notification to field units on July 11, the railways said, “Transfer of goods/stores from one state/Union Territory (UT) to another state/UT is considered to be an exempted activity.” The notification cited section 7 (1) of the CGST Act 2017, along with clause 1(b) the Schedule II of the CGST Act, 2017 for the said exemption.
Experts corroborated this, claiming that according to the GST Act, transfer of goods by any government — Centre or state — or local authority to a similar government unit, is exempt from the indirect tax.
“Transfer of such equipment (without transfer of title) qualifies as a service as per the CGST Act,” said Saloni Roy, senior director, Deloitte Haskins & Sells. 
But here’s the catch: GST experts said the railways claiming transfer of goods as a service could lead to disputes. 
“The supply transaction between two interstate branches may not necessarily be accepted as a transfer of right in goods (defined as ‘service’), and more likely to be treated as the transfer of goods,” said Sachin Menon, partner and head, indirect tax at KPMG in India. 
No exemption would be available if the transaction is classified as a good.
Roy, however, added such exemption has been provided specifically to services between government agencies. If the claim of the railways is accepted, then the inter-state transfer of all goods for self-consumption will be exempted in the case of supply between governments and local bodies, noted experts. 
In June this year, the Ministry of Railways had pitched with Ministry of Finance and the GST Council that the transporter should be considered as a unified entity for purpose of the indirect tax, as it will have to register each of its 17 zones or 73 divisions in all the states under the new regime. It seems this request by the railways has not been accepted.
R Sivadasan, the former financial commissioner of railways, pointed out despite its complex structure of several zones and division, Railways has adapted itself well to the GST regime.
“The exemption is going to be a huge boost for the railways,” he added. 
Earlier this year, the railways appointed law firm Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan to advise it on GST implementation.
The Business Standard, New Delhi, 09th August 2017


Popular posts from this blog

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation Concerns about economic growth and easing inflation prompted five of the six monetary policy committee (MPC) members to call for a cut in the repo rate, but most warned that prices could start accelerating, show the minutes of the panel’s last meeting, released on Wednesday. The comments reflected a tone of caution and flagged upside risks to inflation from farm loan waivers, rise in food prices, especially vegetables, price revisions withheld ahead of the goods and services tax, implementation of house rent allowance under the 7th pay commission and fading of favourable base effect, among others. On 2 August, the panel chose to cut the repurchase rate—the rate at which the central bank infuses liquidity in the banking system—by 25 basis points to 6%. One basis point is one-hundredth of a percentage point. Pami Dua, professor at the Delhi School of Economics, wrote that her analysis showed “a fading economic growth outlook, as …

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

Differential Tax Levy under GST: Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks

Differential Tax Levy under GST:Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks The government’s decision to charge an enhanced tax rate on trademark food brands is leading several rice, wheat and cereal manufacturers to consider de-registering their product trademarks. Irked by the June 28 central government notification fixing a 5 per cent goods and services tax (GST) rate on food items packaged in unit containers and bearing registered brand names, the industry has made several representations to the government to reconsider the differential tax levy, which these players say is creating an unlevel playing field within these highly-competitive and low-margin industries. Sources say that the move has affected the packaged rice industry the hardest and allowed the un-registered market leaders, India Gate and Daawat, to gain advantage as compared to other registered brands such as Kohinoor and Lal Qilla. Smaller players are even more worried with this enhanced rate of tax (against the otherwise …