Skip to main content

Delisted firms to contest BSE order

Delisted firms to contest BSE order
The promoters of at least two dozen of the 200 companies that have been compulsorily delisted by the BSE plan to file a writ petition against the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) and the stock exchange. Their contention is that they are under liquidation and therefore not liable to follow the delisting process, which entails payout to minority shareholders.
Around 45 companies in the list of 200 are undergoing liquidation. These include Alpic Finance, Blue Bird, CFL Capital Financial Services, Dhanus Technologies, Koutons Retail India and DSQ Biotech. Official liquidators have been appointed to wind up the companies’ affairs and to sell-off assets. The assets are being used to pay shareholders followed by the claims of creditors.
“BSE had gone ahead with compulsorily delisting without any prior approval from appellate tribunal. We have not been intimated about it, neither have we been given a chance of a hearing,” said the promoter of one of the companies that has to compulsorily delist. Citing the Companies Act, he added, “We have no role to play in the delisting procedures.”
The Companies Act says no suit or legal proceedings shall be commenced if a company is being wound up. Also, any such move is subject to tribunal approval.
Liquidation also absolves the promoters and employees of the companies, say experts.
An email sent to BSE went unanswered.
“The move is not right for firms that are undergoing liquidation. The company law prohibits legal proceedings if a company under liquidation fails to abide with delisting norms,” said Sandeep Parekh, founder, Finsec Law Advisors.
The move comes at a time Sebi is facing widespread criticism for classifying 331 companies as shell firms and suspending trading without cross-verification. The list was released by the ministry of corporate affairs MCA. BSE had last week issued three different circulars. The first pertained to 117 companies that were suspended for more than 10 years. According to it, promoters of these delisted companies will be required to buy the shares from the public shareholders at the fair value determined by an independent valuer appointed by the exchange.
“Such companies cannot offer the exit option to their shareholders as they are being liquidated,” said JN Gupta, managing partner, SES, a proxy firm. However, the delisting rules allowed the regulator and exchanges to take penal action against promoters in case of wrongdoing, Gupta added.
The second circular is for 28 companies that have remained suspended for more than a decade and are under liquidation. The third circular mentioned 55 companies that have been delisted by the National Stock Exchange (NSE), of which 17 firms are under liquidation.
Compulsorily delisting rules say delisted firms will cease to be listed and therefore not be available for trading. Further, the delisted firm, its whole-time directors, promoters and group companies shall be debarred from accessing the securities market for a period of 10 years from the date of compulsory delisting.
BSE also said till the time the promoters of a company provide an exit option to the public shareholders, it cannot transfer any of equity shares. The regulator can further freeze equity shares and corporate benefits held by the promoter group. The promoters and whole-time directors of such companies are not eligible to become directors of any listed company. Besides, these companies will be moved to the dissemination board of the exchange for a period of five years, as directed by Sebi.
The Business Standard, New Delhi, 31st August 2017

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Govt’s gamble on GST cuts: What do the bond and currency markets signal?

  It’s not just humans who suffer from cognitive biases; markets do too. Interestingly, different financial markets exhibit distinct biases, each interpreting events through its own prism of prejudice. Take the recent announcements on GST reforms: equity markets have chosen to view them through the lens of growth, while bond and currency markets are focusing on potential macroeconomic risks—fiscal pressures and current account challenges. So, which lens captures the true pulse?Equity markets may be right in expecting GST reforms to revive consumption, which has remained lacklustre for a while. But the key question remains—will this revival come at the cost of broader macro stability?It is well known that consumption stocks have rallied since the GST rationalisation announcement. But what about bond markets? What signals are they sending since this rejig was announced from the ramparts of the Red Fort?The signs aren't encouraging. Bond prices have slumped and yields have surged sinc...

Luxury carmakers urge clarity on GST rates to boost festive season sales

  A clear picture regarding new GST rates at the earliest will help the overall auto industry, including the luxury car segment, to regain momentum in the ongoing quarter, which generally sees enhanced sales on account of the festive season.The high-powered GST Council, chaired by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, will meet on September 3-4 to discuss moving to a two-slab taxation.In an interaction with PTI, BMW Group India President and CEO Hardeep Singh Brar said the recent speculation about the change in GST rates has caused uncertainty in the minds of consumers.Consumer interest and demand is strong, but they (prospective buyers) have adopted a wait-and-watch approach, and this delayed decision-making is impacting new vehicle sales at a certain level, he noted."Expediting clarity on GST rates is essential to get back to speed and ensure the auto sector's contribution to economic growth during this quarter is robust," Brar stated.He also hoped that the sustainable p...

Sebi proposes tighter norms for green bond third-party reviewers

  Sebi on Friday said it has proposed to tighten the norms to appoint independent third-party reviewers or certifiers for green debt securities to align them with requirements for other ESG-linked bonds.In a draft circular, Sebi said that the current norms for green bonds, introduced in February 2023, lack detailed requirements around reviewer independence, conflict of interest mitigation, and disclosure standards that are now in place for other ESG-linked securities under a June 2025 circular.The regulator's latest proposal seeks public comments on a revised framework that would bring parity by incorporating comprehensive criteria for third-party certifiers of green bonds on non-convertible securities.Under the proposed norms, issuers of green debt securities will need to appoint reviewers who are independent of their management, directors, and key managerial personnel. These reviewers will be remunerated in a way that prevents any conflicts of interest and possess relevant expert...