Skip to main content

Anti profiteering authority to be ready in a fortnight, says CBEC chief

Anti profiteering authority to be ready in a fortnight, says CBEC chief
The proposed anti-profiteering authority, which will monitor pricing behaviour of businesses under GST, will be up in a fortnight, says CBEC chief Vanaja N. Sarna Businesses will shortly have a new regulator taking a penetrating gaze over their affairs.
The proposed anti-profiteering authority that will monitor pricing behaviour of businesses will be up and running in a fortnight, said Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC) chairperson Vanaja N. Sarna‎.
A selection panel led by Cabinet secretary P.K. Sinha has asked states to suggest candidates for the five-member authority, including the chairperson, while the Union government has sent a list of its nominees to states for state-level screening panels that are part of the authority’s ecosystem, said the CBEC chairperson. 
State-level panels will watch out for instances of businesses not passing on benefits of tax reduction to consumers in the goods and services tax (GST) regime.
During the two-year transition into the GST regime that started in July, the National Anti-profiteering Authority will step in and ask businesses that have not passed on full benefits of a reduced tax burden to consumers to make up for it with interest.
In rare cases, a profiteering business could lose its GST registration too.
“We are expecting nominations (to the Authority) from states in another two weeks. As soon as all these names come in, the Authority will be ready,” said Sarna.
The Authority will be assisted by a four-member standing committee with two state officials. For this, the Union government prefers tax officials from states which are closer to the capital such as Haryana, to be able to hold quick meetings. 
GST’s impact on prices is top on the minds of Union and state policy makers keen to demonstrate that the indirect tax reform benefits the ultimate consumer. That involves not just ensuring that benefits are passed on to consumers, but also convincing them that the higher tax rates they may see on invoices in many cases in the transparent GST regime do not mean that tax burden has gone up. Consumers were not aware of the real burden of embedded taxes on products and services in the earlier regime. 
“Your invoice today specifies central GST, state GST and the cess where applicable. In the earlier regime, consumers could only see the standard rate of value added tax (VAT) of 14.5%, not the central excise duty levied at factory gates of 12.5%, which together led to an actual 27% tax burden. Today the same commodity may be at 18% GST. In the case of cosmetics taxed at 28% GST rate, the increase is only of one percentage point,” explained the CBEC chairperson. 
Industry associations, NGOs and small traders have been making representations to the GST Council for rate revisions on items like sanitary napkins, mixtures (of nuts and other edible items) and some tractor parts. At its 5 August meeting, the GST Council led by finance minister Arun Jaitley brought down tax rates on work outsourced by the labour intensive textile sector and on tractor parts. However, as the new tax system settles down, more rate revisions are unlikely except in cases where there is an unintentional impact on tax burden such as on tobacco.
Sarna said that rolling out GST is also likely to stimulate the direct tax receipts of the government. “Many more assessees are coming into the GST fold, including from the unorganized sector. Earlier, the central excise duty exemption limit was Rs1.5 crore, while the exemption limit for GST is Rs20 lakh annual sales. Also, those who want to claim input tax credit will take GST registration. New GST registrations will favourably impact direct taxes as well,” said she. 
On 4 August, Jaitley said that 7.2 million of the 8 million registered indirect tax assesses under the old regime have registered for GST, in addition to 1.3 million new dealers who have sought GST registration.
The Hindustan Times, New Delhi, 23th August 2017

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

New money laundering norms stump jewellery sector

New money laundering norms stump jewellery sector Dealers with turnover of Rs 2 crore and above covered; industry says threshold too low The central government has notified the money laundering rules for the gems and jewellery sector with immediate effect. Now, any entity deals in precious metals, precious stones, or other high-value goods and has a turnover of Rs 2 crore or more in a financial year will be covered under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA, 2002). The limit of Rs 2 crore would be calculated on the basis of the previous year’s turnover, said the notification. The directorate general of goods and service tax intelligence has been appointed under the Act. Sources said the government’s move to apply the PMLA to the jewellery sector was a fallout of income-tax raids on jewellers soon after demonetisation last November, when it was found that they sold gold and jewellery at a huge premium and accepted old currency notes as payment. The notification, issued on Augus…

Confusion over branded food GST

Confusion over branded food GST The GST Council's statement over the weekend on applying tax on branded food items has left most of the trade confused.

Even though the Council has not changed the rates on food -0 per cent on unbranded stuff and 5 per cent on brands -many small traders who didn't levy GST earlier said they could come under the 5 per cent slab after the clarification.

While they predicted some increase in consumer prices, large players said they can absorb GST in many ways and keep prices steady.

"Trade is confused and hence on behalf of our chamber, we have asked our members to go ahead and charge 5 per cent GST," said Sushil Sureka, general secretary of the Ahilya Chamber of Commerce and Industry in Indore.

The statement clarifying the application of GST came after some businesses were found deregistering their brands and selling under corporate brand name without paying tax, after the Council exempted unbranded food from the new all-encompassing indirec…