Skip to main content

Aadhaar seeding in bank accounts in peril

Aadhaar seeding in bank accounts in peril
SC ruling on privacy could lead to individuals refusing to share details for linking bank accounts

The Supreme Court’s (SC’s) ruling on privacy being a fundamental right could hit banks’ efforts to link accounts with Aadhaar numbers, say bankers and lawyers.

It is mandatory now to link Aadhaar with bank accounts by the end of this calendar year, but bankers say Thursday’s ruling could mean an individual may flat out refuse to share his or her Aadhaar number.

A five-Bench will now rule if Aadhaar would be mandatory, but bankers are already seeing red flags in forcing someone to give up their identification (ID) number.“A person can challenge it since biometric identification is an extreme privacy issue,” said an official with a public sector bank.

“It seems the only way the government can force people to link Aadhaar with their account number is to enable passing on the welfare schemes and subsidies. If a person chooses not to share his/her number, the government can easily say you won’t get the benefit,” the banker said.

Finance Minister Arun Jaitley did mention that point in his interaction with the media. He said Aadhaar was needed for effective “dissipation of social welfare schemes.”

But that is still a grey area. For example, a person can decide to link one account with Aadhaar to receive subsidies, while the other account could be kept unlinked. This would inevitably mean that the government’s effectiveness in its fight against corruption would be greatly blunted.

According to a legal expert, the clause of ‘reasonable restriction’ could still mean the government can make Aadhaar mandatory for monetary transactions and therefore, for banking. 

“While one can argue if the government has the right to know how much money I have in my account, the government has every right to know how much ill-gotten or tax-evaded wealth I have in my account,” said a senior lawyer. He also did not wish to be named, as the crucial judgment on Aadhaar is yet to come.

Bankers also say if Aadhaar is not made mandatory for opening accounts, issues of duplicity cannot be avoided. Any one of a set of six documents can be used for opening a bank account. But making the Aadhaar number, which is available with at least a billion people, mandatory meant there was effectively one standard document that could have been used for avoiding duplicity in account opening. For example, while Permanent Account Number card is an accepted KYC document, not everyone has it and hence, cannot be a standard to verify duplicity. The other account, if the person wants, can very well be opened with a Voter ID or a driving licence. 

But the feeling among bankers now is that Aadhaar no longer would stand legal scrutiny for rampant use in all aspects of life. “It is now difficult to make it mandatory,” said another senior banker.

The Business Standard, New Delhi, 25th August 2017


Popular posts from this blog

At 18%, GST Rate to be Less Taxing for Most Goods

About 70% of all goods and some consumer durables likely to cost less

A number of goods such as cosmetics, shaving creams, shampoo, toothpaste, soap, plastics, paints and some consumer durables could become cheaper under the proposed goods and services tax (GST) regime as most items are likely to be subject to the rate of 18% rather than the higher one of 28%.

India is likely to rely on the effective tax rate currently applicable on a commodity to get a fix on the GST slab, said a government official, allowing most goods to make it to the lower bracket.

For instance, if an item comes within the 12% excise slab but the effective tax is 8% due to abatement, then the latter will be considered for GST fitment.

Going by this formulation, about 70% of all goods could fall in the 18% bracket.

The GST Council has finalised a four-tier tax structure of 5%, 12%, 18% and 28% but has left room for the highest slab to be pegged at 40%. A committee of officials will work out the fitment and the council…

Coffee-Toffee, the GST Debate Continues

Hundreds of crores of rupees in the form of taxes ride on the exact categorisation of products Is Parachute hair oil or edible oil? Is KitKat a chocolate or a biscuit? Is a Vicks tablet medicament or confectionery? For the taxpayer and the tax collector, this is much more than an exercise in semantics -hundreds of crores of rupees ride on the exact categorisation.
As the government moves closer to rolling out the goods and services tax (GST) on July 1, many such distinctions are being debated so that no ambiguity remains. Not just that, the government is revisiting old tax cases that were lost over product categorisation, according to people with knowledge of the matter, presumably with a view to making sure that revenue collections can be maximised. “In the past, several tax officers had challenged some of the product categorisations, including those in the retail segment, but lost out in court or at appellate level,“ said one of the persons. “Now we have a chance to go ahead with speci…

Deposit gush:-CA Institute Bats for Special Audit