Skip to main content

Why composition levy scheme confounds small businesses


The National Capital Region (NCR), one of the biggest markets in the country, spanning three states — Delhi, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh — typifies the challenges for businesses that register under the composition levy scheme.
Applicable to certain categories of small taxpayers — traders, restaurants, and manufacturers/ suppliers — whose annual turnover does not exceed Rs 75 lakh ( Rs 50 lakh for certain states), the objective of the scheme is to make the new indirect tax regime simple with reduced compliance. The tax rates range from 1 per cent for traders, 2 per cent for manufacturers, and 5 per cent for restaurant services. Under the scheme the taxpayer is required to file one return in each quarter.
However, attached to the scheme are riders that have stumped businesses. Any business that makes interstate supply is outside the ambit of the scheme. For instance, small businesses operating in the NCR face the brunt of this condition because their supplies often cross state borders. Moreover, businesses registered under the scheme cannot claim input tax credit on their inward supplies. Similarly, supplies made by such businesses are not eligible for input tax credit.
The invoice issued under the scheme has to mention it’s for the “composition taxpayer and input tax credit not eligible”. This effectively puts businesses under this scheme outside the input tax credit chain.
“The break in the credit chain is making the scheme unattractive,” says Madhukar N Hiregange, partner, Hiregange & Associates. Many tax experts say small dealers and suppliers will lose business in the long run.
Once opted, the scheme applies for the entire financial year. “It is important for a taxpayer to cautiously evaluate its business requirement before opting for the scheme,” says Rajeev Dimri, leader, indirect tax, BMR & Associates.
The penalty for any breach of compliance or filing mistakes under the composition scheme is turning out to be a deterrent for small businesses. A taxpayer is liable to pay tax at a standard rate on the turnover along with the penalty equal to the tax liability in the case of non-compliance.
There is also confusion in the minds of tax experts whether a small business owner who earns rental income or receives interest income would be eligible for registration under the composition levy scheme. “That is the case in most proprietary firms,” says Arun Gupta, a chartered accountant, who has been advising small businesses on GST compliance.
However, Pallav Pradyumn Narang, partner, Arkay & Arkay, says that income earned from non-business activities, such as interest, will not impact the eligibility of people in availing themselves of benefits under this scheme.
The Business standard, New Delhi, 17th July 2017

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

At 18%, GST Rate to be Less Taxing for Most Goods

About 70% of all goods and some consumer durables likely to cost less

A number of goods such as cosmetics, shaving creams, shampoo, toothpaste, soap, plastics, paints and some consumer durables could become cheaper under the proposed goods and services tax (GST) regime as most items are likely to be subject to the rate of 18% rather than the higher one of 28%.

India is likely to rely on the effective tax rate currently applicable on a commodity to get a fix on the GST slab, said a government official, allowing most goods to make it to the lower bracket.

For instance, if an item comes within the 12% excise slab but the effective tax is 8% due to abatement, then the latter will be considered for GST fitment.

Going by this formulation, about 70% of all goods could fall in the 18% bracket.

The GST Council has finalised a four-tier tax structure of 5%, 12%, 18% and 28% but has left room for the highest slab to be pegged at 40%. A committee of officials will work out the fitment and the council…

Coffee-Toffee, the GST Debate Continues

Hundreds of crores of rupees in the form of taxes ride on the exact categorisation of products Is Parachute hair oil or edible oil? Is KitKat a chocolate or a biscuit? Is a Vicks tablet medicament or confectionery? For the taxpayer and the tax collector, this is much more than an exercise in semantics -hundreds of crores of rupees ride on the exact categorisation.
As the government moves closer to rolling out the goods and services tax (GST) on July 1, many such distinctions are being debated so that no ambiguity remains. Not just that, the government is revisiting old tax cases that were lost over product categorisation, according to people with knowledge of the matter, presumably with a view to making sure that revenue collections can be maximised. “In the past, several tax officers had challenged some of the product categorisations, including those in the retail segment, but lost out in court or at appellate level,“ said one of the persons. “Now we have a chance to go ahead with speci…

Deposit gush:-CA Institute Bats for Special Audit