Skip to main content

Tax on property income depends on owner’s business


Be careful before categorising it as business income to claim deductions. Court judgements have clearly defined rules for such classification

Nowadays, many individuals are investing in real estate to create a regular income stream from rent. Apart from residential property, they are increasingly looking at spaces they can rent out to banks for ATMs, godowns, small shops and even commercial complexes. However, filing tax on the income received from such rent can be tricky—it can be classified business income, income from house property, or as other income depending on owner’s main line of business.

Claiming deduction Whether your income from real estate is treated as business income or as income from house property will have a significant impact on the tax deductions you can claim. For example, there are no specific restrictions on the deductions you can claim for business income. The tax payer is free to deduct all eligible expenses from his business income. However, the tax laws do prescribe limits on the quantum of deductions a tax payer can avail on income from house property.

Only 30 per cent standard deduction, municipal taxes and interest on borrowed capital can be claimed as deductions. Classify appropriately If an owner does not use a property for her business or professional purposes, the rental income from that property will be treated as income from house property. In other cases, it will be treated as business income. Suppose that the owner’s main business is to let out property. In that case, rental income from the property, even if it is a residential property, will be considered as business income. There is a court judgement in this regard which states that if the owner runs a paying guest establishment, the income received will be assessed as business income.

However, if letting out is not the property owner’s main business, then the rental income from either commercial or residential property will be taxed as income from house property. Further, if the owner holds a few properties as stock-in-trade and receives rental income from them, this will also be taxed as income from house property, unless letting out is the business of the owner.

All this makes it clear that income earned from letting out commercial property does not necessarily fall under the category of business income. This was highlighted by the Madras High Court in the case of Keyaram Hotels vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax.

The court ruled that if the owner is not engaged in the business activity of letting out properties, rental income received even from commercial property would be assessed as income from house property and not as business income. It observed that the owner had derived income from leasing out his property and had then disclosed it as business income. However, he had not undertaken any commercial or business activity to earn such income. Treatment of composite rent When an owner lets out a property along with other assets, for instance, a building with furniture or a factory building with machinery, the rent he receives is not just for the building but also for the other assets. At times, a person may also let out property and provide various facilities along with it, such as supply of water, security, etc. The rent he receives in all these cases is referred to as composite rent.

If the composite rent is inseparable, then the entire amount is charged under the head of business income or income from other sources, as the case may be. A Bombay
High Court judgment clarifies this in the case of CIT vs DL Kanhere (1972). An individual had leased a cinema building with furniture. As a cinema hall and furniture are inseparable, the court ruled that his rental income was to be treated as income from other sources without any apportionment.

If the property has been let out but the tenant has been provided with additional right to use furniture and fixtures, then the rental income is income from house property whereas the income from letting out of furniture will be treated as income from other sources or business income (if the owner is in the business of letting out furniture). Income from sub-letting With rental charges surging, many tenants consider sub-letting a portion of their rented premises. In such a situation, the income from sub-letting cannot be treated as income from house property as the tenant can never be the owner of the property.

It has to be treated as income from other sources. However, the Income Tax department has held a contrary view. According to it, since the tenant is in full control of the property, there is nothing to suggest that ownership of the premises is essential for levying tax under income from house property. In such situations, the .matter will be decided on case-by case basis.

Rental income will not be considered as income from house property in three situations: one, the property is used by the owner for his business or professional purposes; two, the owner’s main activity is to let out property; and three, if rental income from the property is inseparable from rental income received for furniture or fixtures.

They key principle that tax payers must bear in mind is that the nature of the property is immaterial for determining tax treatment. This depends primarily on what the owner’s main line of business is.

Business Standard New Delhi, 03rd July 2017

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

At 18%, GST Rate to be Less Taxing for Most Goods

About 70% of all goods and some consumer durables likely to cost less

A number of goods such as cosmetics, shaving creams, shampoo, toothpaste, soap, plastics, paints and some consumer durables could become cheaper under the proposed goods and services tax (GST) regime as most items are likely to be subject to the rate of 18% rather than the higher one of 28%.

India is likely to rely on the effective tax rate currently applicable on a commodity to get a fix on the GST slab, said a government official, allowing most goods to make it to the lower bracket.

For instance, if an item comes within the 12% excise slab but the effective tax is 8% due to abatement, then the latter will be considered for GST fitment.

Going by this formulation, about 70% of all goods could fall in the 18% bracket.

The GST Council has finalised a four-tier tax structure of 5%, 12%, 18% and 28% but has left room for the highest slab to be pegged at 40%. A committee of officials will work out the fitment and the council…

Coffee-Toffee, the GST Debate Continues

Hundreds of crores of rupees in the form of taxes ride on the exact categorisation of products Is Parachute hair oil or edible oil? Is KitKat a chocolate or a biscuit? Is a Vicks tablet medicament or confectionery? For the taxpayer and the tax collector, this is much more than an exercise in semantics -hundreds of crores of rupees ride on the exact categorisation.
As the government moves closer to rolling out the goods and services tax (GST) on July 1, many such distinctions are being debated so that no ambiguity remains. Not just that, the government is revisiting old tax cases that were lost over product categorisation, according to people with knowledge of the matter, presumably with a view to making sure that revenue collections can be maximised. “In the past, several tax officers had challenged some of the product categorisations, including those in the retail segment, but lost out in court or at appellate level,“ said one of the persons. “Now we have a chance to go ahead with speci…

Deposit gush:-CA Institute Bats for Special Audit