Skip to main content

Tax on property income depends on owner’s business

Be careful before categorising it as business income to claim deductions. Court judgements have clearly defined rules for such classification

Nowadays, many individuals are investing in real estate to create a regular income stream from rent. Apart from residential property, they are increasingly looking at spaces they can rent out to banks for ATMs, godowns, small shops and even commercial complexes. However, filing tax on the income received from such rent can be tricky—it can be classified business income, income from house property, or as other income depending on owner’s main line of business.

Claiming deduction Whether your income from real estate is treated as business income or as income from house property will have a significant impact on the tax deductions you can claim. For example, there are no specific restrictions on the deductions you can claim for business income. The tax payer is free to deduct all eligible expenses from his business income. However, the tax laws do prescribe limits on the quantum of deductions a tax payer can avail on income from house property.

Only 30 per cent standard deduction, municipal taxes and interest on borrowed capital can be claimed as deductions. Classify appropriately If an owner does not use a property for her business or professional purposes, the rental income from that property will be treated as income from house property. In other cases, it will be treated as business income. Suppose that the owner’s main business is to let out property. In that case, rental income from the property, even if it is a residential property, will be considered as business income. There is a court judgement in this regard which states that if the owner runs a paying guest establishment, the income received will be assessed as business income.

However, if letting out is not the property owner’s main business, then the rental income from either commercial or residential property will be taxed as income from house property. Further, if the owner holds a few properties as stock-in-trade and receives rental income from them, this will also be taxed as income from house property, unless letting out is the business of the owner.

All this makes it clear that income earned from letting out commercial property does not necessarily fall under the category of business income. This was highlighted by the Madras High Court in the case of Keyaram Hotels vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax.

The court ruled that if the owner is not engaged in the business activity of letting out properties, rental income received even from commercial property would be assessed as income from house property and not as business income. It observed that the owner had derived income from leasing out his property and had then disclosed it as business income. However, he had not undertaken any commercial or business activity to earn such income. Treatment of composite rent When an owner lets out a property along with other assets, for instance, a building with furniture or a factory building with machinery, the rent he receives is not just for the building but also for the other assets. At times, a person may also let out property and provide various facilities along with it, such as supply of water, security, etc. The rent he receives in all these cases is referred to as composite rent.

If the composite rent is inseparable, then the entire amount is charged under the head of business income or income from other sources, as the case may be. A Bombay
High Court judgment clarifies this in the case of CIT vs DL Kanhere (1972). An individual had leased a cinema building with furniture. As a cinema hall and furniture are inseparable, the court ruled that his rental income was to be treated as income from other sources without any apportionment.

If the property has been let out but the tenant has been provided with additional right to use furniture and fixtures, then the rental income is income from house property whereas the income from letting out of furniture will be treated as income from other sources or business income (if the owner is in the business of letting out furniture). Income from sub-letting With rental charges surging, many tenants consider sub-letting a portion of their rented premises. In such a situation, the income from sub-letting cannot be treated as income from house property as the tenant can never be the owner of the property.

It has to be treated as income from other sources. However, the Income Tax department has held a contrary view. According to it, since the tenant is in full control of the property, there is nothing to suggest that ownership of the premises is essential for levying tax under income from house property. In such situations, the .matter will be decided on case-by case basis.

Rental income will not be considered as income from house property in three situations: one, the property is used by the owner for his business or professional purposes; two, the owner’s main activity is to let out property; and three, if rental income from the property is inseparable from rental income received for furniture or fixtures.

They key principle that tax payers must bear in mind is that the nature of the property is immaterial for determining tax treatment. This depends primarily on what the owner’s main line of business is.

Business Standard New Delhi, 03rd July 2017


Popular posts from this blog

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation Concerns about economic growth and easing inflation prompted five of the six monetary policy committee (MPC) members to call for a cut in the repo rate, but most warned that prices could start accelerating, show the minutes of the panel’s last meeting, released on Wednesday. The comments reflected a tone of caution and flagged upside risks to inflation from farm loan waivers, rise in food prices, especially vegetables, price revisions withheld ahead of the goods and services tax, implementation of house rent allowance under the 7th pay commission and fading of favourable base effect, among others. On 2 August, the panel chose to cut the repurchase rate—the rate at which the central bank infuses liquidity in the banking system—by 25 basis points to 6%. One basis point is one-hundredth of a percentage point. Pami Dua, professor at the Delhi School of Economics, wrote that her analysis showed “a fading economic growth outlook, as …

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

Differential Tax Levy under GST: Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks

Differential Tax Levy under GST:Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks The government’s decision to charge an enhanced tax rate on trademark food brands is leading several rice, wheat and cereal manufacturers to consider de-registering their product trademarks. Irked by the June 28 central government notification fixing a 5 per cent goods and services tax (GST) rate on food items packaged in unit containers and bearing registered brand names, the industry has made several representations to the government to reconsider the differential tax levy, which these players say is creating an unlevel playing field within these highly-competitive and low-margin industries. Sources say that the move has affected the packaged rice industry the hardest and allowed the un-registered market leaders, India Gate and Daawat, to gain advantage as compared to other registered brands such as Kohinoor and Lal Qilla. Smaller players are even more worried with this enhanced rate of tax (against the otherwise …