Skip to main content

PM defers FDI review as FM gets busy with Opposition

The government is learnt to have ´´postponed´´a high level meeting headed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi for reviewing issues related to foreign direct investment (FDI) on Friday amidabuzz that the Centre was considering relaxing FDI caps in sectors such as multibrand retail and the print media.
The meeting was called to review the progress of FDI approvals across sectors after the recent abolition of the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB), the road map for alternative mechanisms, as well as matters concerning foreign investors in construction and real estate,asource in the know told Business Standard.
He dismissed as “speculative” any talk on FDI liberalisation in multibrand retail and media.
“There´s no such proposal at this point,” he said.
Since Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley was with members of the Opposition ahead of the Monsoon Session of Parliament, beginning Monday, it was decided to postpone the FDI meeting, the source told Business Standard.
However, Union Minister of State for Commerce (independent charge) Nirmala Sitharaman, Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP) Secretary Ramesh Abhishek, and Economic Affairs Secretary Subhash Garg met the Prime Minister for one andahalf hours, another source said.
The subject of discussion could not be confirmed.
“No fresh date has been decided yet for the FDI review meeting,” said an official.
In May, the Cabinet approved the abolition of the FIPB, which was, for 25 years, the singlepoint window for clearing FDI proposals requiring government approval.
The body is being replaced byanew mechanism under which the proposals will be approved by the ministries concerned.
Proposals in sensitive sectors will require the home ministry´s approval.
The respective administrative ministries will now start clearing proposals in consultation with the DIPP, which will also issue the standard operating procedure (SOP) for processing applications and decisions of the government under the extant FDI policy.
As for the other issue on the agenda, up to 100 per cent automatic FDI is allowed in construction development projects.
This includes civil projects such as developing townships, and constructing residential/ commercial premises, roads, or bridges.
Also included are hotels, resorts, hospitals, and recreational facilities, among others.
But the government has clarified in the consolidated FDI policy that the real estate business is out of its purview.
The Business Standard, New Delhi, 15th July 2017


Popular posts from this blog

At 18%, GST Rate to be Less Taxing for Most Goods

About 70% of all goods and some consumer durables likely to cost less

A number of goods such as cosmetics, shaving creams, shampoo, toothpaste, soap, plastics, paints and some consumer durables could become cheaper under the proposed goods and services tax (GST) regime as most items are likely to be subject to the rate of 18% rather than the higher one of 28%.

India is likely to rely on the effective tax rate currently applicable on a commodity to get a fix on the GST slab, said a government official, allowing most goods to make it to the lower bracket.

For instance, if an item comes within the 12% excise slab but the effective tax is 8% due to abatement, then the latter will be considered for GST fitment.

Going by this formulation, about 70% of all goods could fall in the 18% bracket.

The GST Council has finalised a four-tier tax structure of 5%, 12%, 18% and 28% but has left room for the highest slab to be pegged at 40%. A committee of officials will work out the fitment and the council…

Coffee-Toffee, the GST Debate Continues

Hundreds of crores of rupees in the form of taxes ride on the exact categorisation of products Is Parachute hair oil or edible oil? Is KitKat a chocolate or a biscuit? Is a Vicks tablet medicament or confectionery? For the taxpayer and the tax collector, this is much more than an exercise in semantics -hundreds of crores of rupees ride on the exact categorisation.
As the government moves closer to rolling out the goods and services tax (GST) on July 1, many such distinctions are being debated so that no ambiguity remains. Not just that, the government is revisiting old tax cases that were lost over product categorisation, according to people with knowledge of the matter, presumably with a view to making sure that revenue collections can be maximised. “In the past, several tax officers had challenged some of the product categorisations, including those in the retail segment, but lost out in court or at appellate level,“ said one of the persons. “Now we have a chance to go ahead with speci…

Deposit gush:-CA Institute Bats for Special Audit