Skip to main content

Pledged assets can be auctioned by insolvency professionals: NCLT


A recent National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) order has sent corporate lawyers and promoters intoatizzy. The NCLT´s Mumbai Bench has asked for the personal properties of promoters to be auctioned off even when the process of insolvency is pending before the insolvency professional.
The petition was filed by Schweitzer Systemtek India, invoking the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) with the NCLT, after it defaulted onaloan of Rs 4.5 crore given by Dhanlaxmi Bank.
The suit was initiated by the promoter himself against the asset reconstruction company (ARC) after Dhanlaxmi Bank sold the loan to Phoenix ARC.
The NCLT Mumbai Bench said the promoters cannot be granted any relaxation under the IBC and appointed an insolvency professional to go ahead with the auction of the property.
“This Code of 2016 has prescribed certain limitations, which are inbuilt and must not be over looked.
The ´moratorium´ indeed is an effective tool, sometimes being used by the corporate debtor to thwart or frustrate the recovery proceedings, as is the case here,” said the order of July 3. “Going by the strict interpretation of the relevant provisions, no fault can be found with the order of the NCLT, but the material question that remains lingering is whether the prayer could have been granted in the interest of justice and equity,” saidRSLoona, managing partner, Dhaval Vussonji Alliance.
If any viable restructuring is worked out, the creditor will recover his dues without enforcement of any security.
Else, the creditor will be entitled to stand outside liquidation proceedings and realise his dues by enforcement of all security, including collateral ones.
Another lawyer said the onus is now on the company to approach the NCLT tribunal and getastay against this order.
“This case will have farreaching impact on other similar cases being taken up by the NCLT Bench, which is set to hear 500 nonperforming asset cases in the years to come,” said a lawyer.
According to the IBC,acompany gets 270 days to resolve the debt in which an insolvency professional is appointed by the NCLT and the present board of directors is suspended.
After 270 days, if the debt is not resolved, the professional can sell the company´s assets to recover the loan.
But according to the NCLT´s order in Schweitzer Systemtek India suit, instead of waiting for the sixmonth waiting period, the insolvency professional can now go ahead and sell the promoter´s personal property, which was pledged with the banks.
The NCLT Bench, in its examination of the balance sheet of the company, found its assets were significantly insufficient even as the liability was approximately Rs 5.3 crore.
The Business Standard, New Delhi, 20th July 2017

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

At 18%, GST Rate to be Less Taxing for Most Goods

About 70% of all goods and some consumer durables likely to cost less

A number of goods such as cosmetics, shaving creams, shampoo, toothpaste, soap, plastics, paints and some consumer durables could become cheaper under the proposed goods and services tax (GST) regime as most items are likely to be subject to the rate of 18% rather than the higher one of 28%.

India is likely to rely on the effective tax rate currently applicable on a commodity to get a fix on the GST slab, said a government official, allowing most goods to make it to the lower bracket.

For instance, if an item comes within the 12% excise slab but the effective tax is 8% due to abatement, then the latter will be considered for GST fitment.

Going by this formulation, about 70% of all goods could fall in the 18% bracket.

The GST Council has finalised a four-tier tax structure of 5%, 12%, 18% and 28% but has left room for the highest slab to be pegged at 40%. A committee of officials will work out the fitment and the council…

Coffee-Toffee, the GST Debate Continues

Hundreds of crores of rupees in the form of taxes ride on the exact categorisation of products Is Parachute hair oil or edible oil? Is KitKat a chocolate or a biscuit? Is a Vicks tablet medicament or confectionery? For the taxpayer and the tax collector, this is much more than an exercise in semantics -hundreds of crores of rupees ride on the exact categorisation.
As the government moves closer to rolling out the goods and services tax (GST) on July 1, many such distinctions are being debated so that no ambiguity remains. Not just that, the government is revisiting old tax cases that were lost over product categorisation, according to people with knowledge of the matter, presumably with a view to making sure that revenue collections can be maximised. “In the past, several tax officers had challenged some of the product categorisations, including those in the retail segment, but lost out in court or at appellate level,“ said one of the persons. “Now we have a chance to go ahead with speci…

Deposit gush:-CA Institute Bats for Special Audit