Skip to main content

Now, gold importers misusing FTA route for money laundering

If industry experts are to be believed, the recently implemented goods and services tax (GST) regime might have inadvertently openedachannel for gold importers to launder money out of the country.
Many bullion importers, it is learnt, have been exploiting the zeroduty facility under India´s free trade agreements (FTAs) with several countries for this purpose.
According to an industry veteran who did not wish to be named, "under two treaties that India has signed with other countries -FTA and Comprehensive Economic Partnership (CEP) -gold can now be imported without paying the 10 per cent customs duty, as the 12.5 per cent countervailing duty has been subsumed in the goods and services tax (GST), which is 3 per cent for gold".
These importers prefer gold coins as they offeragreater scope for overinvoicing than gold bars.
And, through overinvoicing, they are able to illegally send extra dollars out of the country.
Since the rollout of GST on July 1, it is estimated that at least 2,500 kg of gold coins might have been imported so far from South Korea alone, at zero per cent duty.
The government would have notionally lostarevenue of about $10 million which it might otherwise have collected in the form of basic customs duty and education cess. 
Assuming that these importers marked the imported gold coins up by 0.51 per cent, $500,000 dollars to $1 million might already have been laundered out of India.
Most jewellery manufacturing units are now receiving Korean coins, instead of bullion bars, as the former come ataslightly lower price than the bank rate.
Incidentally,alarge chunk of the margin is consumed by importers, who pocket 99.5 per cent,arate of return that is clearly very high for gold trade.
At their level, most jewellers are not aware of the advantage cost advantage that importers enjoy.
They were surprised to learn that their suppliers were makingakilling and passing on very little to them.
According to insiders, importers employ the following modus operandi to launder money by exploiting the zeroduty window: An importer registers an exporting company in Korea to source coins from the manufacturer, which would have sourced gold from the Indian importing company´s UAE, Hong Kong or Singapore arm. The cost of mintingacoin is about 0.3 per cent, and the manufacturer addsamarkup of say 1.52 per cent to that while making an invoice for the Indian importer´s Korearegistered company.
The exporting firm then ships the gold coins to its Indian sister company by adding another 12 per cent. As the room to price the exporting gold is very wide, given the 10 per cent duty differential for bullion imports, it is easy for the Indian importer to overinvoice and make the payment officially throughavalid banking channel.
Unfortunately, banks fail to do duediligence, as it is difficult for them to estimate the exact value.
The Business standard, New Delhi, 27th July 2017


Popular posts from this blog

At 18%, GST Rate to be Less Taxing for Most Goods

About 70% of all goods and some consumer durables likely to cost less

A number of goods such as cosmetics, shaving creams, shampoo, toothpaste, soap, plastics, paints and some consumer durables could become cheaper under the proposed goods and services tax (GST) regime as most items are likely to be subject to the rate of 18% rather than the higher one of 28%.

India is likely to rely on the effective tax rate currently applicable on a commodity to get a fix on the GST slab, said a government official, allowing most goods to make it to the lower bracket.

For instance, if an item comes within the 12% excise slab but the effective tax is 8% due to abatement, then the latter will be considered for GST fitment.

Going by this formulation, about 70% of all goods could fall in the 18% bracket.

The GST Council has finalised a four-tier tax structure of 5%, 12%, 18% and 28% but has left room for the highest slab to be pegged at 40%. A committee of officials will work out the fitment and the council…

Coffee-Toffee, the GST Debate Continues

Hundreds of crores of rupees in the form of taxes ride on the exact categorisation of products Is Parachute hair oil or edible oil? Is KitKat a chocolate or a biscuit? Is a Vicks tablet medicament or confectionery? For the taxpayer and the tax collector, this is much more than an exercise in semantics -hundreds of crores of rupees ride on the exact categorisation.
As the government moves closer to rolling out the goods and services tax (GST) on July 1, many such distinctions are being debated so that no ambiguity remains. Not just that, the government is revisiting old tax cases that were lost over product categorisation, according to people with knowledge of the matter, presumably with a view to making sure that revenue collections can be maximised. “In the past, several tax officers had challenged some of the product categorisations, including those in the retail segment, but lost out in court or at appellate level,“ said one of the persons. “Now we have a chance to go ahead with speci…

Deposit gush:-CA Institute Bats for Special Audit