Skip to main content

Glitch-free roll-out is expecting too much


The Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC) is prepared for the transition to the goods and services tax (GST). Any issues that come forward will be resolved  within the best time possible, VANAJA SARNA, its chief, tells Dilasha Seth. Edited excerpts:

What will be on top of your agenda for the next 15 days?

With the legal framework put in place, the next and most important step is to hand-hold the taxpayers and other stakeholders, to ensure their smooth transition into this new regime. We will be focusing on helping them in their compliance requirements.

All our field offices have opened GST Sewa Kendras, from where taxpayers can get the help they need. Information on various aspects is also being disseminated through the media. Another important aspect will be clarifying any doubts that might arise while interpreting the laws and notifications.

How prepared is CBEC (to be soon renamed the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs) for the implementation?
We are fully prepared. The new GST formations have come into place since June 22. There are 21 zones, with a total of 107 GST commissionerates and 12 sub commissionerates. Further divided into 768 divisions and 3,969 ranges. Plus, 48 audit commissionerates and 49 appeal commissionerates. This will ensure taxpayer services.

For a robust information technology network, the Directorate General of Systems has been strengthened. Other key directorates, such as the National Academy of Customs, Indirect Taxes and Narcotics, Directorate General of Taxpayer Services and the Directorate General of Goods & Service Tax Intelligence, have also been expanded.

What difficulties do you foresee in the first month of GST implementation?

The difficulties or glitches that could have been foreseen were addressed before the roll-out. As such a huge transition is unprecedented, a glitch-free roll-out will be expecting too much. However, the department is fully prepared for the transition and any issues that come forward will be resolved within the best time possible.

How will the Centre compensate states on a shortfall in cess collection in a particular year?

By and large, the rates of all commodities have been fixed keeping in mind the incidence of taxes prior to GST. So, for commodites attracting compensation cess. Further, the basic structure of GST is such that it will increase compliance. That being so, there should not be a shortfall in cess collection. The GST Council can decide on raising the compensation rates on any of the existing commodities attracting the cess or for including any other supplies which might attract the cess if a need arises.

Will the government look into the concerns of the textile sector? And, smaller players are learnt to be grappling with return filing, three in a month.

Broadly, the fitment committee has already taken into consideration the concerns of various sectors while finalising the rates on all items. With regard to returns, essentially, there is only one return that taxpayers have to file themselves, which has details of the outward supplies made by them. The other returns are auto-populated by the system itself, from the details captured regarding outward supplies. Further, small taxpayers selling within a state, are required to give only a summary of the sales made by them, not the invoice-wise details.

Some companies have cut prices after GST roll-out. Is it to do with fear of the anti-profiteering law?
With seamless flow of input tax credit, prices of various commodities are likely to come down. The government considers trade and industry as an important stakeholder in passing on the benefits of GST to consumers. Further, competition within the sectors itself is an anti-profiteering mechanism. That being so, I see the antiprofiteering provision only as a last resort, when other factors fail to convince any company to pass on the benefits of GST to consumers.

Companies are learnt to be stopping dispatches for the next 10 days to upgrade their software. Will the government intervene?

The roll-out date had been announced well in advance. That being so, the majority of companies had already geared up their information technology systems and software. Thus, fear of the roll-out impacting supplies appears ill-founded.

What issues remain on GST that will be addressed over the next few months?
The majority of issues have been resolved in the 18 meetings of the GST Council held so far. Any other issue that might require a decision will be brought before the Council in due course.

How will the department deal with legacy cases in service tax and excise duty?

The necessary notifications for reorganisation of field formations for legacy work under the central excise and service tax laws, and fresh work related to the central excise laws for the remaining excisable commodities, have also been issued. The intent is that the GST jurisdictions and the new central excise and service tax jurisdictions will be coterminous. Suitable provisions have also been provided in the laws for handling legacy issues.

The Basic Structure of Gst is such that it will increase compliance. That being so, there should not be a shotfall in cess collection"

I see the anti-pofiteering provision only as a last resort, when other factors fail to convince any company to pass on the benefits of GST to consumers"

The roll-out date had been announced well in advance. Thus, fear of the roll-out impacting supplies appears ILL-Founded"

The Department is fully prepared for thec transition any any issues that come forward will be resolved within the best time possible"

Business Standard New Delhi, 03rd July 2017

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation

RBI minutes show MPC members flagged upside risks to inflation Concerns about economic growth and easing inflation prompted five of the six monetary policy committee (MPC) members to call for a cut in the repo rate, but most warned that prices could start accelerating, show the minutes of the panel’s last meeting, released on Wednesday. The comments reflected a tone of caution and flagged upside risks to inflation from farm loan waivers, rise in food prices, especially vegetables, price revisions withheld ahead of the goods and services tax, implementation of house rent allowance under the 7th pay commission and fading of favourable base effect, among others. On 2 August, the panel chose to cut the repurchase rate—the rate at which the central bank infuses liquidity in the banking system—by 25 basis points to 6%. One basis point is one-hundredth of a percentage point. Pami Dua, professor at the Delhi School of Economics, wrote that her analysis showed “a fading economic growth outlook, as …

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India

Shrinking footprints of foreign banks in India Foreign banks are increasingly shrinking their presence in India and are also becoming more conservative than private and public sector counterparts. While many of them have sold some of their businesses in India as part of their global strategy, some are trying to keep their core expertise intact. Others are branching out to newer areas to continue business momentum.For example, HSBC and Barclays Bank in India have got out of the retail business, whereas corporate-focused Standard Chartered Bank is now trying to increase its focus on retail “Building a retail franchise is a huge exercise and takes a long time. You cannot afford to lose it,” said Shashank Joshi, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ’s India head.According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, foreign banks’ combined loan book shrunk nearly 10 per cent from Rs 3.78 trillion in fiscal 2015-16 to Rs 3.42 trillion last financial year. The banking industry, which includes foreign banks…

Differential Tax Levy under GST: Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks

Differential Tax Levy under GST:Food Firms May De-Register Trademarks The government’s decision to charge an enhanced tax rate on trademark food brands is leading several rice, wheat and cereal manufacturers to consider de-registering their product trademarks. Irked by the June 28 central government notification fixing a 5 per cent goods and services tax (GST) rate on food items packaged in unit containers and bearing registered brand names, the industry has made several representations to the government to reconsider the differential tax levy, which these players say is creating an unlevel playing field within these highly-competitive and low-margin industries. Sources say that the move has affected the packaged rice industry the hardest and allowed the un-registered market leaders, India Gate and Daawat, to gain advantage as compared to other registered brands such as Kohinoor and Lal Qilla. Smaller players are even more worried with this enhanced rate of tax (against the otherwise …