Skip to main content
Corporate Travellers Must Give Employer Details for Tax Credit
GST invoices to be shared with cos every month, which can be used to claim benefits. Airlines have written to its corporate travellers to register their companies’ or employers’ GST number to claim a tax credit.

Corporate travellers form a significant chunk of the air traffic in India. They comprise between 30% and 45% of passengers of a lowcost airline and up to 60% for a full service airline. GST of 5% has been levied on economy-class airline tickets and 12% is charged on business class.

“It is mandatory for guests travelling for business to add their company’s GST details at the time of booking. To ensure a seamless experience, we request that you inform your guests travelling for business to register on our portal and claim up to 12% back on flights," Jet Airways said in the letter to its registered passengers.

“After registering, simply add your guest’s GST number every time you make a booking, and all other GST related details will automatically be added to your reservation,” said the airline. Passengers who have not added their GST number at the time of booking may do so within 72 hours of booking their ticket or before their flight departure,whichever is earlier, the airline said.

GST invoices will be shared with the passengers’ companies monthly, which can then be used to claim GST benefits.IndiGo and Vistara sent similar emails to their passengers.

The government since yesterday implemented a new tax structure which seeks to to replace at least seven indirect tax heads.“Earlier too the companies could claim a tax credit for employees’ corporate travel,” said M Shiv kumar, controller at Jet Airways. “The airline then provided a certificate to the corporates with the service tax details against which credit was availed. Now, all the data led by the GST number will be fed into the GST network along with tax invoice details. Corporate entities can then track the transaction in the system and claim credit for the same, which effectively means physical document per se is not adequate unless the same is uploaded in the GST network system,” he added.

“Also in the case of airline travel, service tax was extremely difficult to claim and led to litigations sometimes. Now, it would be much easier,” said an independent chartered accountant on condition of anonymity.Physical document not adequate unless the same is uploaded in the GST network system

The Economic Times New Delhi, 03rd July 2017


Popular posts from this blog

At 18%, GST Rate to be Less Taxing for Most Goods

About 70% of all goods and some consumer durables likely to cost less

A number of goods such as cosmetics, shaving creams, shampoo, toothpaste, soap, plastics, paints and some consumer durables could become cheaper under the proposed goods and services tax (GST) regime as most items are likely to be subject to the rate of 18% rather than the higher one of 28%.

India is likely to rely on the effective tax rate currently applicable on a commodity to get a fix on the GST slab, said a government official, allowing most goods to make it to the lower bracket.

For instance, if an item comes within the 12% excise slab but the effective tax is 8% due to abatement, then the latter will be considered for GST fitment.

Going by this formulation, about 70% of all goods could fall in the 18% bracket.

The GST Council has finalised a four-tier tax structure of 5%, 12%, 18% and 28% but has left room for the highest slab to be pegged at 40%. A committee of officials will work out the fitment and the council…

Coffee-Toffee, the GST Debate Continues

Hundreds of crores of rupees in the form of taxes ride on the exact categorisation of products Is Parachute hair oil or edible oil? Is KitKat a chocolate or a biscuit? Is a Vicks tablet medicament or confectionery? For the taxpayer and the tax collector, this is much more than an exercise in semantics -hundreds of crores of rupees ride on the exact categorisation.
As the government moves closer to rolling out the goods and services tax (GST) on July 1, many such distinctions are being debated so that no ambiguity remains. Not just that, the government is revisiting old tax cases that were lost over product categorisation, according to people with knowledge of the matter, presumably with a view to making sure that revenue collections can be maximised. “In the past, several tax officers had challenged some of the product categorisations, including those in the retail segment, but lost out in court or at appellate level,“ said one of the persons. “Now we have a chance to go ahead with speci…

Deposit gush:-CA Institute Bats for Special Audit