Skip to main content

Bill Amending Banking Regulation Act Tabled in Parliament

A Bill amending the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 has been tabled in the Parliament today. Once enacted into law, the Banking Regulation (Amendment) Bill 2017 is expected to replace the ordinance issued by the centre in May 2018. The following are the highlights of the Bill.
The following are the highlights of the Bill. The ordinance inserts provisions for recovery of outstanding loans as per which, the central government may authorise the Reserve Bank of India to direct banks to initiate recovery proceedings against loan defaulters. These recovery proceedings will be under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.  The Code provides for a time-bound process to resolve defaults by either (i) restructuring a loan (such as changing the repayment schedule), or (ii) liquidating the defaulter’s assets.
The RBI may from time to time issue directions to banks for resolving stressed assets.  Stressed assets are loans where the borrower has defaulted on repayment, or loans which have been restructured. The RBI may specify authorities or committees to advise banks on resolving stressed assets.  Members on these committees will be appointed or approved by the RBI.
The non-performing assets of banks have boosted to more than Rs 9 lakh crore and now RBI is being given power to refer the cases to Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board. 
In June, RBI had identified 12 large loan defaulters who account for 25% of the total bad loans in the banking sector.
Currently, the RBI may issue directions to banks on grounds such as ‘public interest’ and ‘in the interest of banking policy’.  The Ordinance gives RBI additional powers to direct banks to initiate recovery proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. 
Further, a majority of NPAs (88%) are in public sector banks where the central government is a majority shareholder. There are possibilities that the government could initiate recovery proceedings against defaulters without having to authorise the RBI to direct banks.
As the banking regulator, the RBI is responsible for maintaining financial stability, while banks have the flexibility to make business decisions.Currently, banks face certain challenges as part of recovery proceedings such as (i) lack of incentives among public sector bankers to recognise losses, (ii) fear of investigation in case of low recoveries, and (iii) insufficient capital to absorb losses.  The Ordinance may not address some of these issues.
The Economic Times, New Delhi, 25th July 2017


Popular posts from this blog

At 18%, GST Rate to be Less Taxing for Most Goods

About 70% of all goods and some consumer durables likely to cost less

A number of goods such as cosmetics, shaving creams, shampoo, toothpaste, soap, plastics, paints and some consumer durables could become cheaper under the proposed goods and services tax (GST) regime as most items are likely to be subject to the rate of 18% rather than the higher one of 28%.

India is likely to rely on the effective tax rate currently applicable on a commodity to get a fix on the GST slab, said a government official, allowing most goods to make it to the lower bracket.

For instance, if an item comes within the 12% excise slab but the effective tax is 8% due to abatement, then the latter will be considered for GST fitment.

Going by this formulation, about 70% of all goods could fall in the 18% bracket.

The GST Council has finalised a four-tier tax structure of 5%, 12%, 18% and 28% but has left room for the highest slab to be pegged at 40%. A committee of officials will work out the fitment and the council…

Coffee-Toffee, the GST Debate Continues

Hundreds of crores of rupees in the form of taxes ride on the exact categorisation of products Is Parachute hair oil or edible oil? Is KitKat a chocolate or a biscuit? Is a Vicks tablet medicament or confectionery? For the taxpayer and the tax collector, this is much more than an exercise in semantics -hundreds of crores of rupees ride on the exact categorisation.
As the government moves closer to rolling out the goods and services tax (GST) on July 1, many such distinctions are being debated so that no ambiguity remains. Not just that, the government is revisiting old tax cases that were lost over product categorisation, according to people with knowledge of the matter, presumably with a view to making sure that revenue collections can be maximised. “In the past, several tax officers had challenged some of the product categorisations, including those in the retail segment, but lost out in court or at appellate level,“ said one of the persons. “Now we have a chance to go ahead with speci…

Deposit gush:-CA Institute Bats for Special Audit