Skip to main content

Ordinance to give teeth to anti-profiteering clause

By

The government might bring in an ordinance to penalise those who try to make quick money under the goods and service tax (GST) regime. With the GST roll-out scheduled on July 1, the government might have to use this route to ensure a penalising provision is in place. JYOTI MUKUL reports
The government might bring in an ordinance to penalise those who try to make quick money under the goods and service tax (GST) regime. With the GST roll-out scheduled on July 1, the government might have to use this route to ensure a penalising provision is in place.
A proposed anti-profiteering body might be asked to ensure that the new tax regime is not misused, input credits are passed on and customers are not fleeced. The GST law provides such a cover but it does not specify penal action.
A legislation for penal action is required both at the Centre and state levels, though the central GST Act has been enacted at the Centre and state GST Acts have been adopted by the states. “No penalty or conviction can happen unless a law specifying these is passed by the legislature. Such a legislation will specify the upper limits for penalties and conviction,” said an official. An ordinance would be required even if there is a provision for such a body in the current GST law.
The GST Council, a coordination body of the Centre and the states, is likely to meet over the weekend to discuss issues relating to rates and the setting up of such an entity to prevent profiteering.
Under Section 171 of CGST Act, the Council can only set up a body or empower an existing one for fact-finding but that body cannot penalise, said Nihal Kothari, executive director, Khaitan & Co. “The draft GST law that came last year had a provision for an anti-profiteering body. But after realising that penal action cannot be taken without a legislative provision specifying such action, the provision was dropped,” he said.
Kothari said the body under the existing provision can only give a report, like auditors. “Liability cannot be fixed under the current provision. Penalty or prosecution needs a separate statute.”
Making rules under the existing section could be restricted to only empowering a body to analyse the quantum of profiteering. Such “subordinate legislation” (through rules) cannot penalise, said Kothari.
Policy watchers are apprehensive that industry and traders might indulge in profiteering through mechanisms such as hoarding, false labelling and billing, especially during the transition phase. GST would replace excise and value-added tax, besides service tax.
Though the effort is to keep the rates at a level that is revenue neutral and, therefore, has little impact on pricing, some amount of difference in effective tax  is likely in most products and services, said an expert. This could be used by businesses to make a quick profit during the transition phase. "Besides, even later input tax credit may not be fully passed on by profiteers," added the government official.
Business Standard, New Delhi, June 1, 2017

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Govt’s gamble on GST cuts: What do the bond and currency markets signal?

By
  It’s not just humans who suffer from cognitive biases; markets do too. Interestingly, different financial markets exhibit distinct biases, each interpreting events through its own prism of prejudice. Take the recent announcements on GST reforms: equity markets have chosen to view them through the lens of growth, while bond and currency markets are focusing on potential macroeconomic risks—fiscal pressures and current account challenges. So, which lens captures the true pulse?Equity markets may be right in expecting GST reforms to revive consumption, which has remained lacklustre for a while. But the key question remains—will this revival come at the cost of broader macro stability?It is well known that consumption stocks have rallied since the GST rationalisation announcement. But what about bond markets? What signals are they sending since this rejig was announced from the ramparts of the Red Fort?The signs aren't encouraging. Bond prices have slumped and yields have surged sinc...
Post a Comment
Read more

Luxury carmakers urge clarity on GST rates to boost festive season sales

By
  A clear picture regarding new GST rates at the earliest will help the overall auto industry, including the luxury car segment, to regain momentum in the ongoing quarter, which generally sees enhanced sales on account of the festive season.The high-powered GST Council, chaired by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, will meet on September 3-4 to discuss moving to a two-slab taxation.In an interaction with PTI, BMW Group India President and CEO Hardeep Singh Brar said the recent speculation about the change in GST rates has caused uncertainty in the minds of consumers.Consumer interest and demand is strong, but they (prospective buyers) have adopted a wait-and-watch approach, and this delayed decision-making is impacting new vehicle sales at a certain level, he noted."Expediting clarity on GST rates is essential to get back to speed and ensure the auto sector's contribution to economic growth during this quarter is robust," Brar stated.He also hoped that the sustainable p...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sebi proposes tighter norms for green bond third-party reviewers

By
  Sebi on Friday said it has proposed to tighten the norms to appoint independent third-party reviewers or certifiers for green debt securities to align them with requirements for other ESG-linked bonds.In a draft circular, Sebi said that the current norms for green bonds, introduced in February 2023, lack detailed requirements around reviewer independence, conflict of interest mitigation, and disclosure standards that are now in place for other ESG-linked securities under a June 2025 circular.The regulator's latest proposal seeks public comments on a revised framework that would bring parity by incorporating comprehensive criteria for third-party certifiers of green bonds on non-convertible securities.Under the proposed norms, issuers of green debt securities will need to appoint reviewers who are independent of their management, directors, and key managerial personnel. These reviewers will be remunerated in a way that prevents any conflicts of interest and possess relevant expert...
Post a Comment
Read more