Skip to main content

Ordinance to give teeth to anti-profiteering clause

By

The government might bring in an ordinance to penalise those who try to make quick money under the goods and service tax (GST) regime. With the GST roll-out scheduled on July 1, the government might have to use this route to ensure a penalising provision is in place. JYOTI MUKUL reports
The government might bring in an ordinance to penalise those who try to make quick money under the goods and service tax (GST) regime. With the GST roll-out scheduled on July 1, the government might have to use this route to ensure a penalising provision is in place.
A proposed anti-profiteering body might be asked to ensure that the new tax regime is not misused, input credits are passed on and customers are not fleeced. The GST law provides such a cover but it does not specify penal action.
A legislation for penal action is required both at the Centre and state levels, though the central GST Act has been enacted at the Centre and state GST Acts have been adopted by the states. “No penalty or conviction can happen unless a law specifying these is passed by the legislature. Such a legislation will specify the upper limits for penalties and conviction,” said an official. An ordinance would be required even if there is a provision for such a body in the current GST law.
The GST Council, a coordination body of the Centre and the states, is likely to meet over the weekend to discuss issues relating to rates and the setting up of such an entity to prevent profiteering.
Under Section 171 of CGST Act, the Council can only set up a body or empower an existing one for fact-finding but that body cannot penalise, said Nihal Kothari, executive director, Khaitan & Co. “The draft GST law that came last year had a provision for an anti-profiteering body. But after realising that penal action cannot be taken without a legislative provision specifying such action, the provision was dropped,” he said.
Kothari said the body under the existing provision can only give a report, like auditors. “Liability cannot be fixed under the current provision. Penalty or prosecution needs a separate statute.”
Making rules under the existing section could be restricted to only empowering a body to analyse the quantum of profiteering. Such “subordinate legislation” (through rules) cannot penalise, said Kothari.
Policy watchers are apprehensive that industry and traders might indulge in profiteering through mechanisms such as hoarding, false labelling and billing, especially during the transition phase. GST would replace excise and value-added tax, besides service tax.
Though the effort is to keep the rates at a level that is revenue neutral and, therefore, has little impact on pricing, some amount of difference in effective tax  is likely in most products and services, said an expert. This could be used by businesses to make a quick profit during the transition phase. "Besides, even later input tax credit may not be fully passed on by profiteers," added the government official.
Business Standard, New Delhi, June 1, 2017

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

RBI deputy governor cautions fintech platform lenders on privacy concerns during loan recovery

By
  India's digital lending infrastructure has made the loan sanctioning system online. Yet, loan recovery still needs a “feet on the street” approach, Swaminathan J, deputy governor of the Reserve Bank of India, said at a media event on Tuesday, September 2, according to news agency ANI.According to the ANI report, the deputy governor flagged that fintech operators in the digital lending segment are giving out loans to customers with poor credit profiles and later using aggressive recovery tactics.“While loan sanctioning and disbursement have become increasingly digital, effective collection and recovery still require a 'feet on the street' and empathetic approach. Many fintech platforms operate on a business model that involves extending small-value loans to customers often with poor credit profiles,” Swaminathan J said.   Fintech platforms' business models The central bank deputy governor highlighted that many fintech platforms' business models involve providing sm
Post a Comment
Read more

Credit card spending growth declines on RBI gaze, stress build-up

By
  Credit card spends have further slowed down to 16.6 per cent in the current financial year (FY25), following the Reserve Bank of India’s tightening of unsecured lending norms and rising delinquencies, and increased stress in the portfolio.Typically, during the festival season (September–December), credit card spends peak as several credit card-issuing banks offer discounts and cashbacks on e-commerce and other platforms. This is a reversal of trend in the past three financial years stretching to FY21 due to RBI’s restrictions.In the previous financial year (FY24), credit card spends rose by 27.8 per cent, but were low compared to FY23 which surged by 47.5 per cent. In FY22, the spending increased 54.1 per cent, according to data compiled by Macquarie Research.ICICI Bank recorded 4.4 per cent gross credit losses in its FY24 credit card portfolio as against 3.2 per cent year-on-year. SBI Cards’ credit losses in the segment stood at 7.4 per cent in FY24 and 6.2 per cent in FY23, the rep
Post a Comment
Read more

India can't rely on wealthy to drive growth: Ex-RBI Dy Guv Viral Acharya

By
  India can’t rely on wealthy individuals to drive growth and expect the overall economy to improve, Viral Acharya, former deputy governor of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) said on Monday.Acharya, who is the C V Starr Professor of Economics in the Department of Finance at New York University’s Stern School of Business (NYU-Stern), said after the Covid-19 pandemic, rural consumption and investments have weakened.We can’t be pumping our growth through the rich and expect that the economy as a whole will do better,” he said while speaking at an event organised by Elara Capital here.f there has to be a trickle-down, it should have actually happened by now,” Acharya said, adding that when the rich keep getting wealthier and wealthier, they have a savings problem.   “The bank account keeps getting bigger, hence they look for financial assets to invest in. India is closed, so our money can't go outside India that easily. So, it has to chase the limited financial assets in the country and
Post a Comment
Read more