Skip to main content

Start-up policy to get makeover


Rejected firms to get a second chance

The Start Up India policy — first announced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi in his second Independence Day speech in 2015 — is ready for a makeover. Even as the policy guidelines, issued in January 2016 in another mega event, promised many sops to entrepreneurs, the plan has failed to attract start-ups the way it had set out to.

The government is likely to tweak the Start Up India policy within a fortnight to accommodate more innovations, an official aware of the developments told Business Standard. The definition of the policy would be changed as well, making it more liberal for the bio-technology sector in particular, he said. Also, the tweaked policy would mean a second chance for any entity that has faced rejection in the past.

In the biotechnology sector, a start-up could benefit from the policy up to eight years of incorporation, up from the five-year criterion currently. This is because of the relatively long gestation period of the biotech sector, compared to information technology and manufacturing, it is believed.

The move by the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP), the nodal agency for the policy, is expected to create space for more budding entrepreneurs in the country to be eligible for self-certification, relaxed public procurement norms, rebate in patent filing, start-up funding, investment and easier closure compliance. Besides the definition change, the DIPP is likely to allow rejected entities to apply again for tax-exemption benefits. Softening the earlier stance of not considering once-rejected applications again for tax breaks, the DIPP has said such proposals would be reviewed. “The only mandate for acceptance or rejection of proposals is that the idea has to be innovative. The entity may have applied at a premature stage. It may have grown and advanced over time. It cannot be a yardstick for a particular company for all times. They will be allowed to apply again,” said the official. Recent reports suggested that only Rs 5.66 crore funding has been infused into start-ups under the scheme so far, while the government had planned to set up a Rs 10,000crore fund of funds for the purpose. Fund manager Small Industrial Development Bank of India, or Sidbi, has to create the full corpus of Rs 10,000 crore by 2025, of which a Rs 1,315crore fund has been created so far.

But government officials indicated that the pace of approval had picked up. The inter-ministerial board (IMB) approved about 12 start-ups for tax exemption benefits from the 62 considered in the latest meeting on May 1. In all of 2016-17, only 10 start-ups got approval for a tax break from the 142 applications considered. The IMB includes officials from the DIPP, Department of Science and Technology, and Department of Biotechnology. Now, the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology has also been included in the IMB.

Only those start-ups incorporated since April 1, 2016, are eligible to be considered for tax breaks from income-tax on profits and capital gains tax. The eligible start-ups can avail a three-year tax holiday in a block of seven years now, against five years announced last year. The condition was relaxed in this year’s Budget announced on February 1 to ease financial burden on startups and their founders.

A start-up is an entity, incorporated or registered in India not prior to five years, with an annual turnover not exceeding Rs 25 crore in any preceding fiscal year and working towards innovation, development, deployment or commercialisation of new products, processes or services driven by technology or intellectual property.

Business Standard New Delhi, 08th May 2017

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Govt’s gamble on GST cuts: What do the bond and currency markets signal?

  It’s not just humans who suffer from cognitive biases; markets do too. Interestingly, different financial markets exhibit distinct biases, each interpreting events through its own prism of prejudice. Take the recent announcements on GST reforms: equity markets have chosen to view them through the lens of growth, while bond and currency markets are focusing on potential macroeconomic risks—fiscal pressures and current account challenges. So, which lens captures the true pulse?Equity markets may be right in expecting GST reforms to revive consumption, which has remained lacklustre for a while. But the key question remains—will this revival come at the cost of broader macro stability?It is well known that consumption stocks have rallied since the GST rationalisation announcement. But what about bond markets? What signals are they sending since this rejig was announced from the ramparts of the Red Fort?The signs aren't encouraging. Bond prices have slumped and yields have surged sinc...

Luxury carmakers urge clarity on GST rates to boost festive season sales

  A clear picture regarding new GST rates at the earliest will help the overall auto industry, including the luxury car segment, to regain momentum in the ongoing quarter, which generally sees enhanced sales on account of the festive season.The high-powered GST Council, chaired by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, will meet on September 3-4 to discuss moving to a two-slab taxation.In an interaction with PTI, BMW Group India President and CEO Hardeep Singh Brar said the recent speculation about the change in GST rates has caused uncertainty in the minds of consumers.Consumer interest and demand is strong, but they (prospective buyers) have adopted a wait-and-watch approach, and this delayed decision-making is impacting new vehicle sales at a certain level, he noted."Expediting clarity on GST rates is essential to get back to speed and ensure the auto sector's contribution to economic growth during this quarter is robust," Brar stated.He also hoped that the sustainable p...

Sebi proposes tighter norms for green bond third-party reviewers

  Sebi on Friday said it has proposed to tighten the norms to appoint independent third-party reviewers or certifiers for green debt securities to align them with requirements for other ESG-linked bonds.In a draft circular, Sebi said that the current norms for green bonds, introduced in February 2023, lack detailed requirements around reviewer independence, conflict of interest mitigation, and disclosure standards that are now in place for other ESG-linked securities under a June 2025 circular.The regulator's latest proposal seeks public comments on a revised framework that would bring parity by incorporating comprehensive criteria for third-party certifiers of green bonds on non-convertible securities.Under the proposed norms, issuers of green debt securities will need to appoint reviewers who are independent of their management, directors, and key managerial personnel. These reviewers will be remunerated in a way that prevents any conflicts of interest and possess relevant expert...