Skip to main content

Litigation and tax disputes concerns before new regime kicks in


“Dealing with legacy issues,” responded the chief financial officer of a large manufacturing conglomerate when asked to comment on his biggest concern about the goods and services tax (GST).

As corporate India gears up to be GST-ready, the ongoing litigation and tax dispute cases are something most businesses are cagey about.

According to the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report for the period ended March 2016, there were 243,167 demand and 76,151 refund cases pending across forums under service tax and central excise.

Tax experts say the litigation before the tribunal and courts largely relate to exports, classification of goods, and credits under central excise and value added tax (VAT).

“The overall objective of the central and state governments has been to close as much litigation as possible before the advent of the GST,” says Anita Rastogi, partner, indirect tax, PwC.

However, given the volume of pending cases and disputes, it may not be possible to clear the backlog before GST roll-out on July 1.“There would certainly be roll over of cases under existing laws to the GST regime,” says Rastogi.

L Badri Narayanan, partner, Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan, points out that one should not expect quick settlements just because the new indirect tax regime will roll out this financial year. “What, instead, can be expected is expedited adjudication to the extent possible. A set of officers and current tribunals would continue to adjudicate the disputes under the old regime,” he says.

However, almost all state governments have told their tax officials to take steps for closure of existing litigation. Some states have introduced amnesty schemes as well.

At the central level, the powers of adjudication, across ranks, have been increased so that there is reduction in the pendency at the commissioner level, and lower-level officers could dispose of the pending cases. Additional charges have been given to the identified commissionerates and appellate authorities, asking them to target the disposals before the GST goes live.

“The department has also directed its officials to withdraw certain cases before the appellate authorities, given the presence of precedent or absence of contemplated review,” says Rastogi.

In their demand order, tax authorities have started mentioning the option available with the assessee to settle the case through settlement commission. Also, it has started mentioning the provisions of reduced penalty if the tax is paid in a given time.

For a quicker resolution of some existing disputes, tax experts are also advising companies “to pay tax and close the litigation to buy peace” after looking at the merits and materiality of the demand by the revenue department.

05TH APRIL,2017,BUSINESS STANDARD,NEW-DELHI

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RBI deputy governor cautions fintech platform lenders on privacy concerns during loan recovery

  India's digital lending infrastructure has made the loan sanctioning system online. Yet, loan recovery still needs a “feet on the street” approach, Swaminathan J, deputy governor of the Reserve Bank of India, said at a media event on Tuesday, September 2, according to news agency ANI.According to the ANI report, the deputy governor flagged that fintech operators in the digital lending segment are giving out loans to customers with poor credit profiles and later using aggressive recovery tactics.“While loan sanctioning and disbursement have become increasingly digital, effective collection and recovery still require a 'feet on the street' and empathetic approach. Many fintech platforms operate on a business model that involves extending small-value loans to customers often with poor credit profiles,” Swaminathan J said.   Fintech platforms' business models The central bank deputy governor highlighted that many fintech platforms' business models involve providing sm

Credit card spending growth declines on RBI gaze, stress build-up

  Credit card spends have further slowed down to 16.6 per cent in the current financial year (FY25), following the Reserve Bank of India’s tightening of unsecured lending norms and rising delinquencies, and increased stress in the portfolio.Typically, during the festival season (September–December), credit card spends peak as several credit card-issuing banks offer discounts and cashbacks on e-commerce and other platforms. This is a reversal of trend in the past three financial years stretching to FY21 due to RBI’s restrictions.In the previous financial year (FY24), credit card spends rose by 27.8 per cent, but were low compared to FY23 which surged by 47.5 per cent. In FY22, the spending increased 54.1 per cent, according to data compiled by Macquarie Research.ICICI Bank recorded 4.4 per cent gross credit losses in its FY24 credit card portfolio as against 3.2 per cent year-on-year. SBI Cards’ credit losses in the segment stood at 7.4 per cent in FY24 and 6.2 per cent in FY23, the rep

India can't rely on wealthy to drive growth: Ex-RBI Dy Guv Viral Acharya

  India can’t rely on wealthy individuals to drive growth and expect the overall economy to improve, Viral Acharya, former deputy governor of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) said on Monday.Acharya, who is the C V Starr Professor of Economics in the Department of Finance at New York University’s Stern School of Business (NYU-Stern), said after the Covid-19 pandemic, rural consumption and investments have weakened.We can’t be pumping our growth through the rich and expect that the economy as a whole will do better,” he said while speaking at an event organised by Elara Capital here.f there has to be a trickle-down, it should have actually happened by now,” Acharya said, adding that when the rich keep getting wealthier and wealthier, they have a savings problem.   “The bank account keeps getting bigger, hence they look for financial assets to invest in. India is closed, so our money can't go outside India that easily. So, it has to chase the limited financial assets in the country and