Skip to main content

Insured should seek surveyor´s report, claim penalty for delays

Inform the insurer about the damage within two to three days
Atarecent seminar of insurance brokers and surveyors, Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (Irdai) ChairmanTSVijayan admitted that delays with regard to settlement of commercial claims like motor, fire, marine and others continued to be an issue.
Lack of access to surveyors´ reports is another hurdle, especially for small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Besides, while retail (individual) policy holders can approach the Insurance Ombudsman withagrievance, in the case of commercial claims there is no such recourse.
According to Irdai guidelines, any nonmotor claim where the estimated amount is more than Rs.50,000 would require the appointment of an independent surveyor.
Are surveyors truly independent?

“These surveyors, though appointed by the insurance company, are independent intermediaries, as they are licensed and regulated by Irdai. They are accountable for the loss they assess to Irdai and not the insurance company.

Hence, their reports are not biased towards either the insurance company or the insured,´´ says Sasikumar Adidamu, chief technical officer, nonmotor, Bajaj Allianz General Insurance.

Sanjay Radhakrishnan, chief executive officer (CEO), JLT Independent Insurance Brokers, says policyholders havearight to choose fromapanel of surveyors jointly agreed upon by the insurer and the company (policyholder).

However, while this could be true in case of large companies, for SMEs it is not so, says Kapil Mehta, founder of Secure Now Insurance Brokers.

“Small businessmen don´t have the wherewithal to ask for surveyors on their own. That is why the insurance company usually appoints the surveyor.

And due to this, the surveyor´s loyalty tends to be with the insurance company, rather than with the policyholder,´´ he says.

Two factors insurance companies look into are whether the claim is payable and the claim amount.

If the claim is payable and only the amount needs to be verified, the insurance company may appoint an inhouse surveyor instead of an external surveyor.

Ideally,asurveyor must be appointed within 72 hours of claim intimation.

The surveyor must give the report within 30 days but can seek an extension of up to six months.

As part of the investigation, the surveyor would visit the site or speak to the local authorities.

After submission of the report, the insurer is liable to offerasettlement withinamonth. Once the customer accepts the claim amount, the payment has to be made in seven days.

For any delay in payment, the insurer is liable to pay interest on the amount, calculated atarate which is two per cent above the bank rate. “However, if the customer is not okay with the claim amount offered and has requested further negotiations, the penalty is not applicable,´´ Adidamu says.

He insists that the policyholder/ broker can demand the surveyor report from the insurance company.

“If the insured has valid technical grounds to counter the survey report, he can contest with proper documents,´´ he adds.

Documentation bottleneck:

Documentation is another issue for SMEs.

“Sometimes, the company may not have enough documents.

Or the company may have the same document but inadifferent format.

Some companies use proxy documents, for instance, for assessing the value of an asset.

But, this has to be agreed upon by the company and the insurer at the time of buying the policy itself.

Else, there could be delays in claim settlement.

This is where brokers should help by filing the claim inaproper manner,´´ says Radhakrishnan.

Adidamu agrees that the most common reason for delay in claim settlement is nonsubmission of the required/mandatory claims documents.

“This information is conveyed to both policyholder and broker right from the inception of the claim process.

But, despite various reminders, if this requirement is not fulfilled, it results in delays in claim settlement.

Any significant delay in final claim settlement in property policies happens mostly due to the time taken by policy holders in actual reinstatement of damaged property under reinstatement value basis of these policies,´´ he says.

To ensure smooth claim settlement:

Before filing for claims, be aware of the warranty and exclusions mentioned in the policy, says Mehta.

For instance, inaburglary claim, most policies will haveawarranty that there should be 24hour security on the premises.

Many small companies might only have day security.

In suchacase, the insurance company may not admit the claim.

Or forafire claim, the warranty might say there should be fire extinguishers certified by the fire department on the premises.

Else, the claim may not be admitted.

For motor claims, the warranty could say repairs of the vehicle should be uptodate. Again, the claim could be dismissed if this is not done.

Or if the vehicle is stolen because keys were left in it, the claim may not be paid.

The way the claim application is worded is also important.

Radhakrishnan cites an example whereacompany reported damage to its premises on account of an explosion.

It was actually on account of implosion.

This isatechnical difference —explosion implies collateral damage outside the structure, while implosion is when the structure collapses within and there is no external damage.

So, the insurance company said it wasacase of wrong reporting and the claim was delayed.

Always intimate the insurance company on time, generally within 24 to 72 hours of the damage.

“Sending an email will also suffice.

If you inform them after two weeks or so, the insurance company will haveadoubt,´´ says Mehta.

Take pictures of the damage as soon as it occurs.

While filingapolice complaint, writeadetailed report and don´t leave it to the police alone.
Business Standard New Delhi,20th March 2017

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Govt’s gamble on GST cuts: What do the bond and currency markets signal?

  It’s not just humans who suffer from cognitive biases; markets do too. Interestingly, different financial markets exhibit distinct biases, each interpreting events through its own prism of prejudice. Take the recent announcements on GST reforms: equity markets have chosen to view them through the lens of growth, while bond and currency markets are focusing on potential macroeconomic risks—fiscal pressures and current account challenges. So, which lens captures the true pulse?Equity markets may be right in expecting GST reforms to revive consumption, which has remained lacklustre for a while. But the key question remains—will this revival come at the cost of broader macro stability?It is well known that consumption stocks have rallied since the GST rationalisation announcement. But what about bond markets? What signals are they sending since this rejig was announced from the ramparts of the Red Fort?The signs aren't encouraging. Bond prices have slumped and yields have surged sinc...

Luxury carmakers urge clarity on GST rates to boost festive season sales

  A clear picture regarding new GST rates at the earliest will help the overall auto industry, including the luxury car segment, to regain momentum in the ongoing quarter, which generally sees enhanced sales on account of the festive season.The high-powered GST Council, chaired by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, will meet on September 3-4 to discuss moving to a two-slab taxation.In an interaction with PTI, BMW Group India President and CEO Hardeep Singh Brar said the recent speculation about the change in GST rates has caused uncertainty in the minds of consumers.Consumer interest and demand is strong, but they (prospective buyers) have adopted a wait-and-watch approach, and this delayed decision-making is impacting new vehicle sales at a certain level, he noted."Expediting clarity on GST rates is essential to get back to speed and ensure the auto sector's contribution to economic growth during this quarter is robust," Brar stated.He also hoped that the sustainable p...

Sebi proposes tighter norms for green bond third-party reviewers

  Sebi on Friday said it has proposed to tighten the norms to appoint independent third-party reviewers or certifiers for green debt securities to align them with requirements for other ESG-linked bonds.In a draft circular, Sebi said that the current norms for green bonds, introduced in February 2023, lack detailed requirements around reviewer independence, conflict of interest mitigation, and disclosure standards that are now in place for other ESG-linked securities under a June 2025 circular.The regulator's latest proposal seeks public comments on a revised framework that would bring parity by incorporating comprehensive criteria for third-party certifiers of green bonds on non-convertible securities.Under the proposed norms, issuers of green debt securities will need to appoint reviewers who are independent of their management, directors, and key managerial personnel. These reviewers will be remunerated in a way that prevents any conflicts of interest and possess relevant expert...