Skip to main content

Volcker rule looms overexchange IPOs

An American law could limit the universe of institutional investors that may invest in the coming Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) of India’s two major bourses, the BSE and National Stock Exchange (NSE).
The law in question is called the ‘Volcker Rule’, as it was enacted on the recommendation of Paul Volcker, a respected central banker. This US federal regulation prohibits banks from conducting certain investment activities with their own accounts, and limits their ownership of and relationship with hedge funds and private equity funds, also called ‘covered funds’.
And, it appears both BSE and NSE could be deemed ‘covered funds’ as defined in the Volcker Rule for the coming IPOs. Both exchanges are relying on an analysis that they do not come under the definition of an ‘investment company’ under the US Investment Company Act because of an exception provided under it. However, this means they may be considered a covered fund as defined in the Volcker Rule.
A covered fund faces greater restrictions while marketing an IPO to institutional investors, compared to an ‘investment company’. “The exchanges might have to market the offering to a smaller set of institutional clients Banking entities under the relevant law include any US insured depository institution or any company that controls a US-insured depository institution. Any company, including nonUS ones, that are treated as a bank holding company for purposes of Section 8 of the International Banking Act of 1978 are also treated as a bank. This means even a non-US company that maintains a branch, agency or commercial lending office in the US will be categorised as a banking entity.
“There may be limitations on the ability of banking entities to purchase or retain our equity shares in the absence of an applicable Volcker Rule exemption. Consequently, depending on market conditions and the banking entity status of potential purchasers of our equity shares from time to time, the Volcker Rule restrictions could negatively affect the liquidity and market value of our equity shares,” says the NSE draft offer.
There is, however, lack of clarity among experts on which banks come under this restriction or if the restriction will apply at all. “After the Lehman crisis (late 2008), several investment firms like Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley became bank holding companies and all of them have asset management arms. However, I’m not sure how they will classify themselves; it’s a matter of interpretation,” said an investment banker, on condition of anonymity.
After Donald Trump’s win as US president, some of the big US banks have reportedly stepped up lobbying efforts to dilute or eliminate the Volcker Rule. Large US banks include the likes of JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley. Investment bankers managing the exchange offerings believe the impact, if any, is likely to be minuscule.
Both NSE and BSE declined comment on the potential impact of the Volcker rule on investment from foreign institutional players, owing to regulatory restrictions during the IPO period.
The Volcker Rule is part of the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (popularly termed ‘Dodd-Frank, after its sponsors). As explained earlier, it aims to restrict US banks from making speculative investments that do not benefit their customers.
Business Standard New Delhi,11th January 2017

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Govt’s gamble on GST cuts: What do the bond and currency markets signal?

  It’s not just humans who suffer from cognitive biases; markets do too. Interestingly, different financial markets exhibit distinct biases, each interpreting events through its own prism of prejudice. Take the recent announcements on GST reforms: equity markets have chosen to view them through the lens of growth, while bond and currency markets are focusing on potential macroeconomic risks—fiscal pressures and current account challenges. So, which lens captures the true pulse?Equity markets may be right in expecting GST reforms to revive consumption, which has remained lacklustre for a while. But the key question remains—will this revival come at the cost of broader macro stability?It is well known that consumption stocks have rallied since the GST rationalisation announcement. But what about bond markets? What signals are they sending since this rejig was announced from the ramparts of the Red Fort?The signs aren't encouraging. Bond prices have slumped and yields have surged sinc...

Luxury carmakers urge clarity on GST rates to boost festive season sales

  A clear picture regarding new GST rates at the earliest will help the overall auto industry, including the luxury car segment, to regain momentum in the ongoing quarter, which generally sees enhanced sales on account of the festive season.The high-powered GST Council, chaired by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, will meet on September 3-4 to discuss moving to a two-slab taxation.In an interaction with PTI, BMW Group India President and CEO Hardeep Singh Brar said the recent speculation about the change in GST rates has caused uncertainty in the minds of consumers.Consumer interest and demand is strong, but they (prospective buyers) have adopted a wait-and-watch approach, and this delayed decision-making is impacting new vehicle sales at a certain level, he noted."Expediting clarity on GST rates is essential to get back to speed and ensure the auto sector's contribution to economic growth during this quarter is robust," Brar stated.He also hoped that the sustainable p...

Sebi proposes tighter norms for green bond third-party reviewers

  Sebi on Friday said it has proposed to tighten the norms to appoint independent third-party reviewers or certifiers for green debt securities to align them with requirements for other ESG-linked bonds.In a draft circular, Sebi said that the current norms for green bonds, introduced in February 2023, lack detailed requirements around reviewer independence, conflict of interest mitigation, and disclosure standards that are now in place for other ESG-linked securities under a June 2025 circular.The regulator's latest proposal seeks public comments on a revised framework that would bring parity by incorporating comprehensive criteria for third-party certifiers of green bonds on non-convertible securities.Under the proposed norms, issuers of green debt securities will need to appoint reviewers who are independent of their management, directors, and key managerial personnel. These reviewers will be remunerated in a way that prevents any conflicts of interest and possess relevant expert...