Skip to main content

NPA recovery hitby flaws in anti-corruption Act: Jaitley

Finance Minister Arun Jaitley said on Friday the existing provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act (PCA) that do not distinguish between an erroneous decision and a corrupt decision, are hampering public-sector banks’ recovery of non-performing assets (NPAs) and their capacity to lend to the growing needs of the economy.
“I can tell you in settling the current lot of NPAs, it is this one problem alone which is creating challenges before the officials of various public-sector banks. Today, a private-sector bank has the liberty to settle its NPAs and officers of public-sector banks are constrained by the provisions of the 1988 Act,” Jaitley said in his address at an Accountants General conference, organised by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG).
Amendments to PCA that will distinguish this distinction is lying with a Parliamentary panel. Sources said the amendments would be tabled in Parliament in the winter session starting next month if the panel gives its report. PCA was enacted in 1988, three years before India’s economy was opened up.
Jaitley said the time has come for a liberalised regime, which distinguishes between an erroneous decision and a corrupt decision to be put in place so that the civil servants and public-sector companies as well as banks could take important commercial decisions.
“I think this distinction needs to be finally stated. The corrupt decision must be punishable; the erroneous decision can only give you a post-facto analysis so that the system is wiser by that experience,” he said.
Jaitley said PCA’s existing provisions gives a lot of discretion to the investigating officer in deciding whether a particular gain accrued to a private party was fair or unfair.
“People transact with governments to earn money. Nobody consciously transact with governments to lose money. So, a gain in transaction is inevitable. Whether that gain is afair gain or unfair gain, that distinction is to be determined. That puts a decision maker, particularly the civil servant, in a very difficult position in a large number of departments of the government and various public sectors,” said Jaitley.
The finance minister said if a decision has been taken by abuse of power, then post-facto audit has to come down harder. Secondly, if there were procedural irregularities and people have cut corners, then somebody must answer why has it been done as deviation from procedures can raise eye brows.
Business Standard New Delhi,22th October 2016

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New income tax slab and rates for new tax regime FY 2023-24 (AY 2024-25) announced in Budget 2023

  Basic exemption limit has been hiked to Rs.3 lakh from Rs 2.5 currently under the new income tax regime in Budget 2023. Further, the income tax slabs in the new tax regime has been changed. According to the announcement, 5 income tax slabs will be there in FY 2023-24, from 6 income tax slabs currently. A rebate under Section 87A has been enhanced under the new tax regime; from the current income level of Rs.5 lakh to Rs.7 lakh. Thus, individuals opting for the new income tax regime and having an income up to Rs.7 lakh will not pay any taxes   The income tax slabs under the new income tax regime will now be as follows: Rs 0 to Rs 3 lakh - 0% tax rate Rs 3 lakh to 6 lakh - 5% Rs 6 lakh to 9 lakh - 10% Rs 9 lakh to Rs 12 lakh - 15% Rs 12 lakh to Rs 15 lakh - 20% Above Rs 15 lakh - 30%   The revised Income tax slabs under new tax regime for FY 2023-24 (AY 2024-25)   Income tax slabs under new tax regime Income tax rates under new tax regime O to Rs 3 lakh 0 Rs 3 lakh to Rs 6 lakh 5% Rs 6

Jaitley plans to cut MSME tax rate to 25%

Income tax for companies with annual turnover up to ?50 crore has been reduced to 25% from 30% in order to make Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME) companies more viable and also to encourage firms to migrate to a company format. This move will benefit 96% or 6.67 lakh of the 6.94 lakh companies filing returns of lower taxation and make MSME sector more competitive as compared with large companies. However, bigger firms have shown their disappointment since the proposal for reducing tax rates was to make Indian firms competitive globally and it is the large firms that are competing globally. The Finance Minister foregone revenue estimate of Rs 7,200 crore per annum for this for this measure. Besides, the Finance Minister refrained from removing or reducing Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT), a popular demand from India Inc., but provided a higher period of 15 years for carry forward of future credit claims, instead of the existing 10-year period. “It is not practical to rem

Don't forget to verify your income tax return in August: Here's the process

  An ITR return needs to be verified within 120 days of filing of tax return. Now that you have filed your income tax return, remember to verify it because your return filing process is not complete unless you do so. The CBDT has reduced the time limit of ITR verification to 30 days (from 120 days) from the date of return submission. The new rule is applicable for the returns filed online on or after 1st August 2022. E-verification is the most convenient and instant method for verifying your ITR. However, if you prefer not to e-verify, you have the option to verify it by sending a physical copy of the ITR-V. Taxpayers who filed returns by July 31, 2023 but forget to verify their tax returns, will get the following email from the tax department, as per ClearTax. If your ITR is not verified within 30 days of e-filing, it will be considered invalid, and may be liable to pay a Late Fee. Aadhaar OTP | EVC through bank account | EVC through Demat account | Sending duly signed ITR-V through s