Skip to main content

New date for Budget only after Acharya panel inputs

The National Democratic Alliance government at the Centre wants to change the date of the Union Budget,in sync with the suggestions of an expert panel examining the feasibility of a new financial yearfor the country.
At present,the Budget is usually presented on the last day of February.A committee headed by for merchief economic advisor Shankar Acharya was setup to examine whether the April-to-March financial year could be replaced with anewone.
With the possibility of an earlier Budget date,the Budget season has already begun this year.Sources said senior officer shavestarted to brain stormonthethemes of the annual exercise.
Specifics are yet tobe worked out,but the broad theme would be“development”,according to a highly placed source.The focus will be on achieving eight percent yearly growth and government expenditure with an eye on that goal,he said.
Several state elections,including that of Uttar Pradesh,are scheduled nextyear.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi,it is learnt, has discussed the possibility of advancing the Union Budget2017-18,but no date hasbeen confirmed.
The two dates being talked about are February6 and 8,butseveral issues have to be looked at be fore final isingit.
Infact,there are voices with in the government and outside(includingOppositionparties)who are against any change to the Budget date.
The  idea  behind  having  the  Budget  in  early  February  is  that  Parliament  approval  can  come  by  Marchend, ahead  of  the  new  financial  year  starting  April 1. Such  a move  would  help  prevent  “fiscal  pendency”  and  tax uncertainties in the new financial year,officials believe. Finance Minister Arun Jaitley had also supported the idea as it would result in balanced expenditure by the government through the year. However,the Shankar Acharya committee input on the Budget timing may be critical for a decision. According to the terms of reference,the Acharya panel has time till December to submit its report on the feasibility of a new financial year.The committee has not received any reference yet from the government on early input on Budget date,it is learnt. Other members of the committee are former Cabinet secretary, K M Chandrasekhar, former finance secretary of Tamil Nadu,PVR ajaraman,and a research fellow at the Centre for Policy Research,Rajiv Kumar.
A source close to the development told this news paper the Acharya committee is in the process of consultation. “Views will be firmed up only after giving opportunities to the principal stakeholders.’’The committee will also look at public views expressed on the my gov.in portal,besides getting“notes and papers from various sources’’. Besides giving reasons from the stand point of receipts and expenditure of the central and state governments and agricultural cropperiods,the committee would also have to analyse the impact on businesses,taxation and transacting Budget work,if the financial year were to change.
Business Standard New Delhi,05th September 2016

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Govt’s gamble on GST cuts: What do the bond and currency markets signal?

  It’s not just humans who suffer from cognitive biases; markets do too. Interestingly, different financial markets exhibit distinct biases, each interpreting events through its own prism of prejudice. Take the recent announcements on GST reforms: equity markets have chosen to view them through the lens of growth, while bond and currency markets are focusing on potential macroeconomic risks—fiscal pressures and current account challenges. So, which lens captures the true pulse?Equity markets may be right in expecting GST reforms to revive consumption, which has remained lacklustre for a while. But the key question remains—will this revival come at the cost of broader macro stability?It is well known that consumption stocks have rallied since the GST rationalisation announcement. But what about bond markets? What signals are they sending since this rejig was announced from the ramparts of the Red Fort?The signs aren't encouraging. Bond prices have slumped and yields have surged sinc...

Luxury carmakers urge clarity on GST rates to boost festive season sales

  A clear picture regarding new GST rates at the earliest will help the overall auto industry, including the luxury car segment, to regain momentum in the ongoing quarter, which generally sees enhanced sales on account of the festive season.The high-powered GST Council, chaired by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, will meet on September 3-4 to discuss moving to a two-slab taxation.In an interaction with PTI, BMW Group India President and CEO Hardeep Singh Brar said the recent speculation about the change in GST rates has caused uncertainty in the minds of consumers.Consumer interest and demand is strong, but they (prospective buyers) have adopted a wait-and-watch approach, and this delayed decision-making is impacting new vehicle sales at a certain level, he noted."Expediting clarity on GST rates is essential to get back to speed and ensure the auto sector's contribution to economic growth during this quarter is robust," Brar stated.He also hoped that the sustainable p...

Sebi proposes tighter norms for green bond third-party reviewers

  Sebi on Friday said it has proposed to tighten the norms to appoint independent third-party reviewers or certifiers for green debt securities to align them with requirements for other ESG-linked bonds.In a draft circular, Sebi said that the current norms for green bonds, introduced in February 2023, lack detailed requirements around reviewer independence, conflict of interest mitigation, and disclosure standards that are now in place for other ESG-linked securities under a June 2025 circular.The regulator's latest proposal seeks public comments on a revised framework that would bring parity by incorporating comprehensive criteria for third-party certifiers of green bonds on non-convertible securities.Under the proposed norms, issuers of green debt securities will need to appoint reviewers who are independent of their management, directors, and key managerial personnel. These reviewers will be remunerated in a way that prevents any conflicts of interest and possess relevant expert...