Skip to main content

Monthly returns to be mandatory under GST

CBEC draft rules say returns must have details of profit and loss account

Businesses have to file at least three monthly returns and one annual return for each state, if draft rules proposed by the indirect tax department are introduced under the goods and services tax (GST) regime.

The Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC) on Tuesday came out with one more set of draft rules and their formats on GST returns and refunds, after it released one set on Monday. The indirect tax regime is expected to be rolled out from April 1, 2017.

Monthly returns are for output supply, input supply and summary accounts and would cover state GST, integrated GST (IGST) and central GST (CGST).

Currently, businesses have to file valued added tax returns but these are quarterly. Service tax returns must be filed but only twice in a year and not state-wise, explained Pratik Jain, leader-indirect tax, PwC India.

The GST returns has to contain details of profit, according to the profit and loss account, incorporating gross profit, net profit, etc, Jain said.

On why the profit and loss account was needed as it was not corporate income tax, Jain said the purpose was not clear from the rules issued by the CBEC. However, it seemed that the government wanted to reconcile the information given on these returns with the income-tax returns, he said.

Comments on the rules have been sought by Wednesday.

Also, the accounts have to be audited for those having an annual turnover of more than Rs 1 crore. "This will require a major overhaul of the accounting systems for large companies," Jain said.

"Overall, the rules on return, in particular, look quite comprehensive and it is clear that businesses would need to have a strong technology support for GST compliance. The key, of course, will lie in effective implementation of the rules by the government," he said.

On refunds, in case of supplies to special economic zones (SEZs), the recipient of goods and services has to file an application for refund, which makes it clear that upfront GST has to be incurred in such cases, unlike now where there is upfront exemption in most cases. This will lead to cashflow issues for SEZs and impact the information technology (IT) and IT-enabled services sector.

However, there is a stipulation of provisional refund within seven days of receipt of refund application. Such provisional refund, though, is only contemplated if the compliance rating of the supplier is at least five (out of a score of 10), a concept which is alien to taxpayers now.

As to how the score would be calculated, Jain said it was not clear from the draft rules.

The two set of draft rules will be finalised at the second meeting of the GST Council on September 30.

The draft rules, according to Rajat Mohan, director-indirect taxation, Nangia & Co, "have prescribed the form and manner of submission of quarterly returns by composition supplier, returns by non-resident taxable person, input service distributor, persons required to deduct tax at source and the form and manner of submitting statement of supplies effected through e-commerce."

Sandeep Chilana, partner, Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co, said the government in its frequently asked questions had clarified that only interstate branch transfers would attract GST and that intrastate branch transfer would not have such tax incidence.

However, the draft registration rules issued by the CBEC on Monday said in case a company seeks separate registration for its business verticals in a state, intrastate branch transfer between such registered business verticals would also attract GST. 

Business Standard, New Delhi, 28 September 2016

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Govt’s gamble on GST cuts: What do the bond and currency markets signal?

  It’s not just humans who suffer from cognitive biases; markets do too. Interestingly, different financial markets exhibit distinct biases, each interpreting events through its own prism of prejudice. Take the recent announcements on GST reforms: equity markets have chosen to view them through the lens of growth, while bond and currency markets are focusing on potential macroeconomic risks—fiscal pressures and current account challenges. So, which lens captures the true pulse?Equity markets may be right in expecting GST reforms to revive consumption, which has remained lacklustre for a while. But the key question remains—will this revival come at the cost of broader macro stability?It is well known that consumption stocks have rallied since the GST rationalisation announcement. But what about bond markets? What signals are they sending since this rejig was announced from the ramparts of the Red Fort?The signs aren't encouraging. Bond prices have slumped and yields have surged sinc...

Luxury carmakers urge clarity on GST rates to boost festive season sales

  A clear picture regarding new GST rates at the earliest will help the overall auto industry, including the luxury car segment, to regain momentum in the ongoing quarter, which generally sees enhanced sales on account of the festive season.The high-powered GST Council, chaired by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, will meet on September 3-4 to discuss moving to a two-slab taxation.In an interaction with PTI, BMW Group India President and CEO Hardeep Singh Brar said the recent speculation about the change in GST rates has caused uncertainty in the minds of consumers.Consumer interest and demand is strong, but they (prospective buyers) have adopted a wait-and-watch approach, and this delayed decision-making is impacting new vehicle sales at a certain level, he noted."Expediting clarity on GST rates is essential to get back to speed and ensure the auto sector's contribution to economic growth during this quarter is robust," Brar stated.He also hoped that the sustainable p...

Sebi proposes tighter norms for green bond third-party reviewers

  Sebi on Friday said it has proposed to tighten the norms to appoint independent third-party reviewers or certifiers for green debt securities to align them with requirements for other ESG-linked bonds.In a draft circular, Sebi said that the current norms for green bonds, introduced in February 2023, lack detailed requirements around reviewer independence, conflict of interest mitigation, and disclosure standards that are now in place for other ESG-linked securities under a June 2025 circular.The regulator's latest proposal seeks public comments on a revised framework that would bring parity by incorporating comprehensive criteria for third-party certifiers of green bonds on non-convertible securities.Under the proposed norms, issuers of green debt securities will need to appoint reviewers who are independent of their management, directors, and key managerial personnel. These reviewers will be remunerated in a way that prevents any conflicts of interest and possess relevant expert...