Skip to main content

GST Effect: FMCG, Auto Cos In a Fix Over Tax Holiday Offered by States

HP, Uttarakhand, Gujarat, TN to be worst hit as some of the backward areas in the states have tax holidays
Many companies, especially in the fast moving consumer goods (FMCG) and auto sectors, are reaching out to state and central governments seeking clarity on whether there could be a way to grandfather tax incentives by state governments because under the goods and services tax (GST) regime, the ongoing tax holidays for investing in underdeveloped areas would mean little.
“This is not just a tax issue; it is a sensitive political issue. While many companies that had invested in these areas due to lower taxation will see rising costs, state governments may not be able to abide by the MOUs they had signed with these companies,“ said a person close to the development.
In many cases the companies are far from their sunset clauses or the time frame when they no longer are eligible for tax exemptions.
The government may not be in a position to continue the current exemptions once GST comes into play. Industry experts say this could also lead to litigation between companies and the government. The government may not be in a position to continue the current exemptions once GST comes into play.People in the know said that some of the state governments have also reached out to the centre on the issue.
The way it happened till now was that a state government would declare that they would give tax incentive in a particular area. Say a company invested . 5,000 crore in that area; the state go` vernment would exempt the company from paying local taxes. If the tax holiday is for say 10 years, the company need not pay VAT and CST for 10 years or for `. 5,000 crore, whichever is earlier.
“The tax holidays or the area based incentives based on the VAT, CST refund or exemption that were extended by the state governments, may get negatively impacted in the GST regime, as the state may not be in a position to refund or exempt GST part of the incentive. There is no discussion or any hint in the model law (on) how to deal with this situation,“ said Sachin Menon, national head, indirect tax, KPMG.
The centralised tax, the GST, would subsume state levies like VAT or CST.Also under GST, the taxes would be collected by a state where the goods are sold and not where the goods are manufactured, as in the current taxation system. So, goods manufactured in an area where there is a tax holiday, if sold in another state the GST would be collected there. Getting back the credit from a separate state would be almost impossible. Many state governments, especially the hill states of Uttarakhand and Himachal Pradesh, would be worst affected as some of the backward areas in the states have tax holidays.
This could also affect other states like Gujarat and Tamil Nadu, where tax incentives were offered to automobile companies.
Like in a recent case, Gujarat government had given some tax incentives to Tata Motors for an investment. Due to the GST, Tata Motors is set to lose out on that. Replying to an email about the Sanand plant and the tax incentive Tata Motors said, “While we are analysing the details of impact on the company , we welcome the passage of the forward looking reform, which will augur well in the long term for uniform economic progress across the country .“
Other automobile companies as well as FMCG majors like HUL and P&G could also be impacted by this.
There is also a view that the central government can tweak the current GST framework and allow some tax credit to a company if the company has invested in a notified backward area. “The problem with this is, the chain (of taxation) is broken and this could lead to a lot of problems later on,“ said a person in the know.
The Economic Times New Delhi,08th August 2016

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Govt’s gamble on GST cuts: What do the bond and currency markets signal?

  It’s not just humans who suffer from cognitive biases; markets do too. Interestingly, different financial markets exhibit distinct biases, each interpreting events through its own prism of prejudice. Take the recent announcements on GST reforms: equity markets have chosen to view them through the lens of growth, while bond and currency markets are focusing on potential macroeconomic risks—fiscal pressures and current account challenges. So, which lens captures the true pulse?Equity markets may be right in expecting GST reforms to revive consumption, which has remained lacklustre for a while. But the key question remains—will this revival come at the cost of broader macro stability?It is well known that consumption stocks have rallied since the GST rationalisation announcement. But what about bond markets? What signals are they sending since this rejig was announced from the ramparts of the Red Fort?The signs aren't encouraging. Bond prices have slumped and yields have surged sinc...

Luxury carmakers urge clarity on GST rates to boost festive season sales

  A clear picture regarding new GST rates at the earliest will help the overall auto industry, including the luxury car segment, to regain momentum in the ongoing quarter, which generally sees enhanced sales on account of the festive season.The high-powered GST Council, chaired by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, will meet on September 3-4 to discuss moving to a two-slab taxation.In an interaction with PTI, BMW Group India President and CEO Hardeep Singh Brar said the recent speculation about the change in GST rates has caused uncertainty in the minds of consumers.Consumer interest and demand is strong, but they (prospective buyers) have adopted a wait-and-watch approach, and this delayed decision-making is impacting new vehicle sales at a certain level, he noted."Expediting clarity on GST rates is essential to get back to speed and ensure the auto sector's contribution to economic growth during this quarter is robust," Brar stated.He also hoped that the sustainable p...

Sebi proposes tighter norms for green bond third-party reviewers

  Sebi on Friday said it has proposed to tighten the norms to appoint independent third-party reviewers or certifiers for green debt securities to align them with requirements for other ESG-linked bonds.In a draft circular, Sebi said that the current norms for green bonds, introduced in February 2023, lack detailed requirements around reviewer independence, conflict of interest mitigation, and disclosure standards that are now in place for other ESG-linked securities under a June 2025 circular.The regulator's latest proposal seeks public comments on a revised framework that would bring parity by incorporating comprehensive criteria for third-party certifiers of green bonds on non-convertible securities.Under the proposed norms, issuers of green debt securities will need to appoint reviewers who are independent of their management, directors, and key managerial personnel. These reviewers will be remunerated in a way that prevents any conflicts of interest and possess relevant expert...