A Raid that I-T Department Doesn't Want to Talk About

Searches homes of informer who has contacts with CBDT chief

The Income Tax Department, which generally bandies about search and seizure action to unearth undisclosed income, is unusually quiet about an operation it carried out last month.

On June 2, the I-T department raided the residential premises of a technology consultant, Pritin Sanyal, in New Delhi and Lucknow. The documents it came across during the searches included one with the names of four senior income tax commissioners and their future postings, including at the investigation wing in Delhi, said tax officials in the know.

As the searches were underway, a Russian girl who was present at Sanyal's upmarket Safdarjung Enclave residence, slashed her wrist, prompting the tax officials to lodge a police complaint and inform the Russian Embassy.

Three more searches were carried out later at the residences of some accomplices of Sanyal in Delhi, Chennai and Kolkata.

The case becomes curious because Sanyal was an informer to the tax department -officials claimed the leads he gave were worthless -and had contacts with its top officers, including the chief of the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT). Tax officials said he was misusing the names of top officers and impersonating them, but the department hasn't, at least yet, filed any police case on that and has kept the matter under wraps. The Russian girl, meanwhile, has left the country, police said. Police also said that the tax department has given them little information.

A senior official said Sanyal used to drop names of key officials, MPs and also claimed to be part of an RSS think tank. And, he was in touch with Atulesh Jindal, the CBDT chairman, and exchanged text messages with him, said this official, speaking on condition of anonymity.

So, what prompted the department to raid him?

“He was misusing the names of top officials and impersonating. We were fooled into believing him,“ said an official. “The matter was brought to the notice of top echelons, after which a go-ahead to search him was received,“ said this official, who is in direct knowledge of this operation.

Sanyal, when contacted by ET, admitted to knowing Jindal, the CBDT chief. “Yes, I know him. What is the harm in knowing anyone socially,“ he said, but denied any wrongdoing. “But I have never dropped or misused names of any top officials. I was never part of any RSS think tank,“ he said.

Jindal, however, denied knowing Sanyal.

“May be he is an impostor, I don't know. I can't comment on this,“ Jindal told ET. “I don't interfere in matters of search and seizure. I checked up with member (investigation) and he has clarified that a police complaint has been filed and my name doesn't figure in any search or complaint or otherwise.“ h or complaint or otherwise.“

The Delhi Police said they ha ven't received any compla ints on impersonation.

The complaint was about the presence of the Russian girl and her suicide attempt as well as recovery of the pas sports of some girls at Sany al's residence, that too witho ut any evidence, said a police official. On being asked why no complaint has been filed on impersonation, a senior I-T official said the matter was being handled internally.

Sanyal said the Russian was a student and his guest. “She slashed her wrist because she was under depression,“ he claimed.

Sanyal said the tax department raided him after it came across documents related to his business transactions with one Ramesh Astha.The department had raided Astha on May 6.

“Yes, I had given money to Astha, a goldsmith, for buying a flat at Sujan Singh Park (Delhi). The tax department, when it stumbled upon this document, it decided to search me,“ he said.

Sanyal admitted that he had a document with the names of four senior income tax commissioners on it, but denied anything unusual in it.

“I have never misused anyone's name. Yes, I have friends in income tax,“ he said. “I do help my friends. Tell me is there any harm in helping out friends. We all do it in society and in our social circles."

The Economic Times New Delhi, 15th July 2016

New income tax slab and rates for new tax regime FY 2023-24 (AY 2024-25) announced in Budget 2023

Basic exemption limit has been hiked to Rs.3 lakh from Rs 2.5 currently under the new income tax regime in Budget 2023. Further, the income tax slabs in the new tax regime has been changed. According to the announcement, 5 income tax slabs will be there in FY 2023-24, from 6 income tax slabs currently. A rebate under Section 87A has been enhanced under the new tax regime; from the current income level of Rs.5 lakh to Rs.7 lakh. Thus, individuals opting for the new income tax regime and having an income up to Rs.7 lakh will not pay any taxes The income tax slabs under the new income tax regime will now be as follows: Rs 0 to Rs 3 lakh - 0% tax rate Rs 3 lakh to 6 lakh - 5% Rs 6 lakh to 9 lakh - 10% Rs 9 lakh to Rs 12 lakh - 15% Rs 12 lakh to Rs 15 lakh - 20% Above Rs 15 lakh - 30% The revised Income tax slabs under new tax regime for FY 2023-24 (AY 2024-25) Income tax slabs under new tax regime Income tax rates under new tax regime O to Rs 3 lakh 0 Rs 3 lakh to Rs 6 lakh 5% Rs 6

Jaitley plans to cut MSME tax rate to 25%

Income tax for companies with annual turnover up to ?50 crore has been reduced to 25% from 30% in order to make Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME) companies more viable and also to encourage firms to migrate to a company format. This move will benefit 96% or 6.67 lakh of the 6.94 lakh companies filing returns of lower taxation and make MSME sector more competitive as compared with large companies. However, bigger firms have shown their disappointment since the proposal for reducing tax rates was to make Indian firms competitive globally and it is the large firms that are competing globally. The Finance Minister foregone revenue estimate of Rs 7,200 crore per annum for this for this measure. Besides, the Finance Minister refrained from removing or reducing Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT), a popular demand from India Inc., but provided a higher period of 15 years for carry forward of future credit claims, instead of the existing 10-year period. “It is not practical to rem

Don't forget to verify your income tax return in August: Here's the process

An ITR return needs to be verified within 120 days of filing of tax return. Now that you have filed your income tax return, remember to verify it because your return filing process is not complete unless you do so. The CBDT has reduced the time limit of ITR verification to 30 days (from 120 days) from the date of return submission. The new rule is applicable for the returns filed online on or after 1st August 2022. E-verification is the most convenient and instant method for verifying your ITR. However, if you prefer not to e-verify, you have the option to verify it by sending a physical copy of the ITR-V. Taxpayers who filed returns by July 31, 2023 but forget to verify their tax returns, will get the following email from the tax department, as per ClearTax. If your ITR is not verified within 30 days of e-filing, it will be considered invalid, and may be liable to pay a Late Fee. Aadhaar OTP | EVC through bank account | EVC through Demat account | Sending duly signed ITR-V through s

CA Online

Search This Blog