Skip to main content

Sebi asks exchanges to change norms on investor claims

The Securities and Exchange Board of India ( Sebi) has asked stock exchanges to change their byelaws to ensure investors are compensated from their investor protection fund ( IPF) if a trading member or broker is expelled. The current laws only entertain claims in case of broker defaults.
The issue arose after the BSE exchange refused to pay money from its IPF to aggrieved investors after the expulsion of Delhi- based broker Kassa Finvest last year. Its byelaws, it told them, allowed IPF money to be utilised only if abroker had defaulted.
However, the National Stock Exchange ( NSE) began paying claims due to investors from its IPF last year, said a source. BSE owed only a few crores to investors, as 70- 80 per cent of transactions done by the broker were through NSE, added the person. As of April last year, investor claims against Kassa Finvest reportedly amounted to about Rs.150 crore.
BSE says it had disbursed Rs. 29.7 lakh from the assets of Kassa available with the exchange to 16 clients. “According to our guidelines, NSE refunds to investors when amember defaults or is expelled,” said an NSE spokesperson.
An exchange may expel a trading member if guilty of contravention, non- compliance, disobedience, disregard or evasion of any byelaw, rules or regulations of the exchange.
Default can occur for failure to fulfil obligations, pay dues/ penalties or abide by arbitration proceedings.
A default generally precedes an expulsion, with the latter being a more drastic measure, as the entity cannot again become a member.
Kassa Finvest was first expelled by NSE in April last year. A month prior to this, Sebi had barred Kassa and its top executives from accessing the securities markets, for raising funds by illegally selling securities of its clients/ investors and promising assured returns.
Under present laws, the maximum compensation limit per investor, if found due and payable out of an IPF, is Rs. 15 lakh. Investors have to lodge claims against a defaulting or expelled trading member within three months of a public notice put out by the exchanges. After going through aprocess of arbitration, the claims are examined by the Defaulters Committee of the exchange. The committee then recommends the IPF trustees to release the relevant amount.
According to experts, exchanges need to be more transparent in dealing with claims. “ Exchanges often reject claims on certain grounds even if these conditions are not spelt out in existing guidelines. For instance, an exchange might reject a claim if it feels the investor is a intra- day trader, rather than a long- term investor. Such conditions need to be made part of the byelaws,” said a securities lawyer on condition of anonymity.
Parsoli Corporation 2014 Expelled Unicon Securities 2014 Expelled & Defaulter Kolar Sharex 2014 Expelled Kassa Finvest 2015 Expelled Click2Trade Capital 2015 Defaulter Moongipa Investments 2015 Defaulter Orion Capital and Debt Market 2015 Expelled Dreams Broking 2015 Defaulter
Business Standard New Delhi,16th June 2016

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Govt’s gamble on GST cuts: What do the bond and currency markets signal?

  It’s not just humans who suffer from cognitive biases; markets do too. Interestingly, different financial markets exhibit distinct biases, each interpreting events through its own prism of prejudice. Take the recent announcements on GST reforms: equity markets have chosen to view them through the lens of growth, while bond and currency markets are focusing on potential macroeconomic risks—fiscal pressures and current account challenges. So, which lens captures the true pulse?Equity markets may be right in expecting GST reforms to revive consumption, which has remained lacklustre for a while. But the key question remains—will this revival come at the cost of broader macro stability?It is well known that consumption stocks have rallied since the GST rationalisation announcement. But what about bond markets? What signals are they sending since this rejig was announced from the ramparts of the Red Fort?The signs aren't encouraging. Bond prices have slumped and yields have surged sinc...

Luxury carmakers urge clarity on GST rates to boost festive season sales

  A clear picture regarding new GST rates at the earliest will help the overall auto industry, including the luxury car segment, to regain momentum in the ongoing quarter, which generally sees enhanced sales on account of the festive season.The high-powered GST Council, chaired by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, will meet on September 3-4 to discuss moving to a two-slab taxation.In an interaction with PTI, BMW Group India President and CEO Hardeep Singh Brar said the recent speculation about the change in GST rates has caused uncertainty in the minds of consumers.Consumer interest and demand is strong, but they (prospective buyers) have adopted a wait-and-watch approach, and this delayed decision-making is impacting new vehicle sales at a certain level, he noted."Expediting clarity on GST rates is essential to get back to speed and ensure the auto sector's contribution to economic growth during this quarter is robust," Brar stated.He also hoped that the sustainable p...

Sebi proposes tighter norms for green bond third-party reviewers

  Sebi on Friday said it has proposed to tighten the norms to appoint independent third-party reviewers or certifiers for green debt securities to align them with requirements for other ESG-linked bonds.In a draft circular, Sebi said that the current norms for green bonds, introduced in February 2023, lack detailed requirements around reviewer independence, conflict of interest mitigation, and disclosure standards that are now in place for other ESG-linked securities under a June 2025 circular.The regulator's latest proposal seeks public comments on a revised framework that would bring parity by incorporating comprehensive criteria for third-party certifiers of green bonds on non-convertible securities.Under the proposed norms, issuers of green debt securities will need to appoint reviewers who are independent of their management, directors, and key managerial personnel. These reviewers will be remunerated in a way that prevents any conflicts of interest and possess relevant expert...