Skip to main content

Bad year for public sector as banks bleed

Listed public sector firms, which represent the better part of the larger universe of state- owned firms, had a bad year with their combined profits plunging by 44 per cent on shrinking sales. The trouble was most pronounced in the banking sector but was not limited to it, as a couple of industrial sector firms also slipped into red.
The numbers reiterate the challenge faced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi as he tries to balance the contradictory expectations of two of his key constituencies: reform- focused investors and nationalist hardliners. In aninterview to The Wall Street Journal a head of the second anniversary of his government last month, Modi said, “ In any developing country in the world, both the public and private sector have avery important role to play. You can’t suddenly get rid of the public sector, nor should you.” An analysis of 66 listed public sector firms, which recorded revenues of Rs.50 crore or more compiled by Business Standard Research Bureau showed that their combined profit fell by 44 per cent to Rs.75,517 crore in FY16, from Rs.1.34 lakh crore the previous year. Net sales ( total income for banks) fell by 9.2 per cent, to Rs.20.59 lakh crore. The number of profitmaking firms fell from 57 to 43, despite a couple of turnaround stories. The data included 30 companies in the industrial sector, 21 banks and 15 non- bank services sector firms.
Banks were the worst performers, with 13 of them reporting losses. Seven out of the other eight which reported profits saw their profits fall, underlining the extent of the bad debts plaguing the industry.
Services sector was the saving grace, with 12 of the 15 companies reporting profits. Among the loss- making firms in the sector, Mahanagar Telephone Nigam reduced losses by 30 per cent over the previous year.
Gains by oil marketing companies, which benefited from soft crude oil prices that remained below $ 50 most of the year, meant this sector saw a 50 per cent increase in combined profits.
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation was the top performer, with profits nearly trebling to Rs. 4,921.5 crore, from Rs.1,498 crore in the previous year. Indian Oil Corporation and Bharat Petroleum Corporation also reported significant jump in profit after tax ( PAT) numbers at 128 per cent and 66 per cent, respectively.
Industrial sector — which included mining, manufacturing and utility firms - also had it bad, with Bharat Heavy Electricals ( BHEL) and Steel Authority of India ( SAIL) slipping into red. BHEL reported a net loss of ? 895 crore, against a PAT of Rs.1,452.38 in FY15. SAIL reported a loss of Rs. 4,001 crore, as steel prices continue to be under pressure.
Though 23 of 30 firms in the sector were in the green, many reported lower profits, dragging the overall profit number by 23 per cent, on a sales fall of 8.1 per cent. Bharat Immunology is another company that slipped into red in FY16.
Bengaluru- based Indian Telephone Industries was the only government firm that went the other way. The telephone maker reported a profit of ? 251.19 crore, but this was largely due to an extraordinary item of a government grant to meet employee- benefit expenses.
The lacklustre financial performance has put off investors.
Since the highs of 7,800 levels in August, the BSE public sector undertaking ( PSU) index has lost nearly a fifth of its value. Though it has recovered from lows of February, it closed at 6,298 on Friday, down 19.55 per cent from August. In comparison, the benchmark Sensex has lost about five per cent in the same period.
Analysts said the pain for the PSUs is likely to continue in the near term. Rahul Shah, vicepresident– equity advisory services, Motilal Oswal Securities, said, “ Next one year will be challenging for the PSU stocks.” Shah said the government is working on cleaning up the banks, which is likely to take a few months. The companies linked to commodities such as Coal India and ONGC, which are index heavyweights and contribute to investor sentiment, are also likely to remain under pressure, given the downturn in the global commodities cycle. Even the prospects of BHEL looks challenging, with no big orders in the picture, Shah added.
That would complicate the government’s journey on the long road to achieve the disinvestment target of Rs.56,500 crore.
It aims to raise Rs.36,000 crore from selling minority stakes. So far, a single share sale in National Hydroelectric Power Corporation has raised around Rs.2,700 crore.
The government’s troubles are not limited to the listed space alone. A report by the Comptroller and Auditor General ( CAG) last month had highlighted the problem with the larger PSU universe, which includes many unlisted firms. The CAG audited 157 central public sector enterprises, which have accumulated losses of Rs.1,10,285 crore, while 113 incurred losses during 2014- 15, amounting to Rs.15,397 crore. “ The net worth of 64 government companies ( out of 157) had been completely eroded by accumulated loss and their net worth was negative,” said the report
Business Standard New Delhi, 04th June 2016

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Govt’s gamble on GST cuts: What do the bond and currency markets signal?

  It’s not just humans who suffer from cognitive biases; markets do too. Interestingly, different financial markets exhibit distinct biases, each interpreting events through its own prism of prejudice. Take the recent announcements on GST reforms: equity markets have chosen to view them through the lens of growth, while bond and currency markets are focusing on potential macroeconomic risks—fiscal pressures and current account challenges. So, which lens captures the true pulse?Equity markets may be right in expecting GST reforms to revive consumption, which has remained lacklustre for a while. But the key question remains—will this revival come at the cost of broader macro stability?It is well known that consumption stocks have rallied since the GST rationalisation announcement. But what about bond markets? What signals are they sending since this rejig was announced from the ramparts of the Red Fort?The signs aren't encouraging. Bond prices have slumped and yields have surged sinc...

Luxury carmakers urge clarity on GST rates to boost festive season sales

  A clear picture regarding new GST rates at the earliest will help the overall auto industry, including the luxury car segment, to regain momentum in the ongoing quarter, which generally sees enhanced sales on account of the festive season.The high-powered GST Council, chaired by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, will meet on September 3-4 to discuss moving to a two-slab taxation.In an interaction with PTI, BMW Group India President and CEO Hardeep Singh Brar said the recent speculation about the change in GST rates has caused uncertainty in the minds of consumers.Consumer interest and demand is strong, but they (prospective buyers) have adopted a wait-and-watch approach, and this delayed decision-making is impacting new vehicle sales at a certain level, he noted."Expediting clarity on GST rates is essential to get back to speed and ensure the auto sector's contribution to economic growth during this quarter is robust," Brar stated.He also hoped that the sustainable p...

Sebi proposes tighter norms for green bond third-party reviewers

  Sebi on Friday said it has proposed to tighten the norms to appoint independent third-party reviewers or certifiers for green debt securities to align them with requirements for other ESG-linked bonds.In a draft circular, Sebi said that the current norms for green bonds, introduced in February 2023, lack detailed requirements around reviewer independence, conflict of interest mitigation, and disclosure standards that are now in place for other ESG-linked securities under a June 2025 circular.The regulator's latest proposal seeks public comments on a revised framework that would bring parity by incorporating comprehensive criteria for third-party certifiers of green bonds on non-convertible securities.Under the proposed norms, issuers of green debt securities will need to appoint reviewers who are independent of their management, directors, and key managerial personnel. These reviewers will be remunerated in a way that prevents any conflicts of interest and possess relevant expert...